نخستین مکتب های اقتصادی

Mirjalili, Seyed hossein (2006): نخستین مکتب های اقتصادی. Published in: FARHANG; Quarterly Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies , Vol. 19, No. 59 (18 December 2006): pp. 211-244.

Abstract

The earliest economic schools in the Western world emerged during the Scholastic period (16th century). Prior to that, significant economic ideas had been proposed by various thinkers; however, as they did not gain followers, they remained as individual economic thoughts rather than forming schools. Nevertheless, these early ideas influenced later thinkers and even the founders of subsequent economic schools. It appears that the first economic school in the Western world was the School of Salamanca, which emerged in the 16th century at the University of Salamanca in Spain and gained a following. Another was Mercantilism, which dominated European thought from the late 16th century to the second half of the 18th century. The third was the Physiocratic school (or the school of natural order), which prevailed in France for about two decades in the 18th century. These three schools are considered pre-classical schools of thought, offering the first economic ideas with coherent features characteristic of an intellectual tradition.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: The Forerunner Schools of Economic Thought
• Language: Persian
• Keywords: Economic school, Physiocracy, Mercantilism, Salamanca, Neo-Mercantilism, Neo-Physiocracy.
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B11 - Preclassical (Ancient, Medieval, Mercantilist, Physiocratic)

References

1 ) http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/schools/salamanca.htm.

2) Rockwell, Llewellyn H. “Free market Economists: 400 years ago”, A publication of the foundation for Economic education, September 1995, vol. 45, No. 9.

3) - Laura LaHaye ,”Mercantilism”, The concise encyclopaedia of Economics, edited by: David R. Henderson, 2002.

4) ) Allen, William, R. “Mercantilism”, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, vol.3, Macmillan Press,1987.

5) ) . Vaggi , G “physiocrats”, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, vol.3, Macmillan Press,1987.

6) Irwin, Douglas A.,”Strategic trade policy and Mercantilist Trade Rivalries”, American Economic Review, Vol.82, May 1992.

7) Irwin, Douglas A. ”Mercantilism as strategic trade policy: The Anglo-Dutch Rivalry for the East India Trade”, Journal of political economy, Vol.99, December 1991.

8) Brander, James and Barbara Spencer,”Export subsidies and International market share rivalry”, Journal of international economics, Vol.18, February 1985.

9) Viner, Jacob, ”Mercantilist Thought”, International Encyclopedia of the social sciences, Edited by David L. Sills, The Macmillan company& The Free Press,Vol.4,1972.

10) Spengler,Joseph, ”Physiocratic thought”, International Encyclopedia of the social sciences, Edited by David L. Sills, The Macmillan company& The Free Press,Vol.4,1972.

11) Oser, Jacob, ”The Evolution of Economic Thought”, Second Edition, Harcourt, Brace& world inc.,1970.

12) Roover, Raymond, ”Ancient and Medieval thought”, International Encyclopedia of the social sciences, Edited by David L. Sills, The Macmillan company& The Free Press,Vol.4,1972.

13) Reynolds, R. Larry,” History of Economic Thought”, Boise State University,2000.

14) Cleveland, Cutler,”Biophysical Economics: from physiocracy to ecological economics and industry ecology”, Boston University, 1999.

15) Chartrand, Harry Hillman, ”The Neo Physiocracy; Biology, Economics and Epistemology”, University of Saskatchewan, April 2002.