Cellini, Roberto and Lambertini, Luca and Sterlacchini, Alessandro (2009): Managerial incentive and the firms’ propensity to invest in product and process innovation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_12935.pdf Download (234kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We study the product and process innovation choice of firms in which a managerial incentive à la Vickers (1985) is present. Taking a two-stage dynamic game approach, we show that managerial firms are led to over-invest in process innovation, as compared to standard profit-maximising firms, while they under-invest in product innovation. The reason is that process innovation allows to decrease cost, and this is consistent with a convenient increase in the production level. On the opposite, product innovation allows increasing price, which is in contrast with the taste for output expansion embodied in the objective function of firms run by managers. Preliminary empirical evidence on Italian companies suggests that in fact the managerial nature of firm associates with significantly smaller efforts in product innovation while the effect on process innovation is positive but non-significant.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Managerial incentive and the firms’ propensity to invest in product and process innovation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Process innovation; Product innovation; R&D; Managerial incentive |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games |
Item ID: | 12935 |
Depositing User: | Roberto Cellini |
Date Deposited: | 22 Jan 2009 12:48 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 08:46 |
References: | Arrow, K.J. (1962), “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention”, in R. Nelson (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Industrial Activity, Princeton University Press, Princeton. Audretsch, D. (1995) Innovation and Industry Evolution, MIT Press, Boston. Baumol, W.J. (1958), “On the Theory of Oligopoly”, Economica, 25, 187-98. Capitalia (2002) Indagine sulle imprese manifatturiere. Ottavo rapporto sull’industria italiana e sulla politica industriale, Capitalia, Roma. Cellini R. and L. Lambertini, (2008) “Product and Process Innovation in Differential Games with Managerial Firms”, in R. Cellini and L. Lambertini (Eds.) The Economics of Innovation: Incentives, Cooperation, and R&D Policy, Emerald Publishing, Bingley, UK, 159-76. Choi, J.C. and H.S. Shin (1992), “A Comment on a Model of Vertical Product Differentiation”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 40, 229-31. Cohen, W. and S. Klepper (1996), “Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 232-43. d'Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin (1988), “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers”, American Economic Review, 78, 1133-37. Dutta, P.K., S. Lach and A. Rustichini (1995), “Better Late than Early: Vertical Differentiation in the Adoption of a New Technology”, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 4, 563-89. Fershtman, C. and K. Judd (1987), “Equilibrium incentives in oligopoly”, American Economic Review, 77, 927-40. Eurostat (1997) Community Innovation Survey 1, Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Fritsch, M. and M. Meschede (2001) “Product Innovation, Process Innovation, and Size”, Review of Industrial Organization, 19, 335-50. Gabszewicz, J.J. and J.-F. Thisse (1979), “Price Competition, Quality and Income Disparities”', Journal of Economic Theory, 20, 340-59. Gabszewicz, J.J. and J.-F. Thisse (1980), “Entry (and Exit) in a Differentiated Industry”, Journal of Economic Theory, 22, 327-38. Hall, B, F. Lotti and Jacques Mairesse (2007), “Employment, Innovation, and Productivity: Evidence from Italian Microdata”, NBER Working Papers No. 13296. Harrington, J.E. (1995), “Experimentation and Learning in a Differentiated-Products Duopoly”, Journal of Economic Theory, 66, 275-88. Henriques, I. (1990), “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers: Comment”, American Economic Review, 80, 638-40. Kamien, M.I., E. Muller and I. Zang (1992), “Cooperative Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels”, American Economic Review, 82, 1293-1306. Kopel, M. and C. Riegler (2006), “R&D in a Strategic Delegation Game Revisited: A Note”, Managerial and Decision Economics, 27, 605-12. Kroekel, M. (2004), “R&D Spillovers and Strategic Delegation in Oligopolistic Contests”', Managerial and Decision Economics, 25, 147-56. Lambertini, L., S. Poddar and D. Sasaki (2002), “Research Joint Ventures, Product Differentiation and Price Collusion”', International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 829-54. Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo (1997) “Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 83-118. Majerus, D. (1988), “Price vs Quantity Competition in Oligopoly Supergames”, Economics Letters, 27, 293-7. Mohnen, P., J. Mairesse and M. Dagenais (2006), “Innovativity: a Comparison Across seven European Countries”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15, 391-413. Parisi, M.L., F. Schiantarelli and A. Sembenelli (2006), “Productivity, Innovation and R&D: Micro Evidence for Italy”, European Economic Review, 50, 2037-51. Pavitt, K. (1984), “Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: toward a Taxonomy and a Theory”, Research Policy, 13, 343-73. Rosenkranz, S. (2003), “Simultaneous Choice of Process versus Product Innovation when Consumers have a Preference for Product Variety”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 50, 183-201. Santarelli, E. and A. Sterlacchini (1994), “Embodied Technological Change in Supplier Dominated Firms. The Case of Italian Traditional Industries”, Empirica, 21, 313-27. Schumpeter, J. A. (1911) The Theory of Economic Development (English edition: 1934), Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942), Socialism, Capitalism, and Democracy, Allen&Unwin, London. Shaked, A. and J. Sutton (1982), “Relaxing Price Competition through Product Differentiation”, Review of Economic Studies, 69, 3-13. Shaked, A. and J. Sutton (1983), “Natural Oligopolies”, Econometrica, 51, 1469-83. Suzumura, K. (1992), “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers”, American Economic Review, 82, 1307-20. Vickers, J. (1985), “Delegation and the Theory of the Firm”, Economic Journal, 95 (Conference Papers), 138-47. Weiss, P. (2003), “Adoption of Product and Process Innovation in Differentiated Markets: The Impact of Competition”, Review of Industrial Organization, 23, 301-14. Williamson, O. (1971), “The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations”, American Economic Review, 61, 112-23. Winter, S. (1984) “Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55, 287-320. Yeats, A. (1998), “Just How Big Is Global Production Sharing”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1871. Yin X. and E. Zuscovitch (1998), “Is Firm Size Conducive to R&D Choice? A Strategic Analysis of Product and Process Innovations”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35, 243-62. Zhang, J. and Z. Zhang (1997), “R&D in a Strategic Delegation Game”, Managerial and Decision Economics, 18, 391-98. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/12935 |