Spehar, Ann O'Ryan (2008): The Great Moderation and the New Business Cycle. Published in: World Economics Journal , Vol. 10, No. 1 (2009)
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_13487.pdf Download (147kB) | Preview |
Abstract
There is a new approach to modeling business cycles that is gaining acceptance. It appears that there is good evidence that this approach may have a great deal to offer in understanding the causes and processes of major economic business cycles associated with financial crisis. This paper does not intend to define a mathematical model but instead describes the ideas and theories behind this new approach. In addition, this paper addresses a few of the unique challenges officials within the United States face with the current global crisis.
The new approach has at its core the belief that the structure of our current economy, as well as many European economies, has changed significantly. Starting around 1983-1985 a structural break occurred that resulted in a period where changes in GDP, consumption and inflation ceased to experience high volatility. This period has been dubbed “The Great Moderation” and it is significant. It is thought that these new economies have specific characteristics that generate endogenous financial business cycles. That is, these cycles are not triggered by exogenous supply or demand shocks that throw an economy off of a steady state but instead are an endogenous force within the gears of the system itself that creates imbalances that can build up without any noticeable increase in inflation - the traditional parameter typically used to monitor imbalances. The main characteristic of this new era of Great Moderation is rapidly rising growth coupled with low and stable prices which is highly correlated with an increase in the probability of episodes of financial instability (Borio 2003). In fact, within these new economies inflation shows up first as excess demand within credit aggregates and asset prices rather than in the traditional goods and services markets. This means that a financial crisis could occur without inflation ever having occurred within the broader economy. If asset bubbles are left unattended the resulting implosion of the bubbles can create virulent deflationary episodes. And it is the unwinding of the financial imbalances caused by the bubbles that are the source of financial instability. And it is worth noting that minimizing the deflationary impact will not stop the necessary unwinding and required rebalancing. Again, this paper does not intend to define a model but instead simply lays out the ideas and theories behind this new modeling approach. This paper will first compare the traditional to the new modeling approach by first describing the economic environment that creates the business cycle. Secondly it will compare the two paradigms and explain how each generates different questions and answers in monitoring and explaining economic stability. Finally, I touch on a few of the unique challenges facing our current crisis within the United States.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Great Moderation and the New Business Cycle |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Great Moderation; Business Cycles; Austrian Economics |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles |
Item ID: | 13487 |
Depositing User: | Ann Spehar |
Date Deposited: | 20 Feb 2009 08:38 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 18:50 |
References: | 1. Bakshi, Gurdip S. and Zhiwu Chen. 1996. "Inflation, Asset Prices, and the Term Structure of Interest Rates in Monetary Economies." Review of Financial Studies. Vol. 9. Pp. 241-76. 2. Bank for International Settlements. 1998. "The Role of Asset Prices in the Formulation of Monetary Policy." BIS Conference Papers. Vol. 5. Basel.Bank for International Settlements (2001): “Empirical studies of structural changes and inflation”, BIS Papers, No 3, August. 3. Claudio Borio, William English, Andrew Filardo (2003) “A Tale of Two Perspectives: Old or New Challenges for Monetary Policy?” BIS Working Paper No. 127 February 4. Claudio Borio (2008) The Financial Turmoil of 2007-?: “A Preliminary Assessment and Some Policy Considerations” BIS Monetary and Economic Department No. 251 March 5. Claudio Borio, Iihyock Shim, (2007) “What Can Macro-Prudential Policy do to Support Monetary Policy?” (BIS) Monetary and Economic Department No. 242 December 6. Bernanke, Ben and Mark Gertler. 1999. "Monetary Policy and Asset Price Volatility." Economic Review. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Vol. IV. Pp.17-51. 7. Barro, Robert J. 1996. "Inflation and Growth." Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review. Vol. 48. No.3. Pp.153-69. May/June. 8. Borio, C, C Furfine and P Lowe (2001): “Procyclicality of the financial system and financial stability: Issues and Policy Options” in Marrying the Macro- and Micro-prudential Dimensions of Financial Stability, BIS Papers, No 1, pp 1-57. 9. Borio, C, N Kennedy and S Prowse (1994): “Exploring Aggregate Asset Price Fluctuations Across Countries: Measurement, Determinants and Monetary Policy Implications”, BIS Economic Papers, No 40, Basel, April. 10. Claudio Borio and Philip Lowe (2002) “Asset prices, financial and monetary stability: exploring the nexus” BIS Economic Papers, No 114. July. 11. Claudio Borio and Andrew Filardo (2007) “Globalisation and Inflation: New Cross-Country Evidence on the Global Determinants of Domestic Inflation” BIS Working Papers No 227 May. 12. Dermirguc-Kunt, A and E Detragiache (1997):“The determinants of banking crises: evidence from developing and developed countries”, IMF Working Paper WP/97/106. 13. ----- (1998): “Financial liberalisation and financial fragility”, IMF Working Paper WP/98/83. 14. Edison, H (2000): “Do indicators of financial crises work? An evaluation of an early warning system”, International Finance Discussion Papers, No 675, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 15. Friedman, Milton and Schwartz Anna, A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press (for the National Bureau of Economic Research), 1963. 16. Glassman, James K., and Kevin A. Hassett. 2001. "Did the Fed's Obsession with Stocks Cause it to Miss the Slowdown?" Wall Street Journal. January 5. 17. International Monetary Fund, (2000) World Economic and Financial Surveys, “World Economic Outlook May 2000 Asset Prices and the Business Cycle” 18. International Monetary Fund, (March 2002) Global Financial Stability Report, Chapter IV Early Warning Systems Models: The Next Steps Forward 19. Paul Mizen, (2008) The Credit Crunch of 2007-2008: A Discussion of the Background, Market Reactions, and Policy Responses, Review: Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis September/October 2008 20. Naohiko Baba, Paola Gallardo, (2008) “OTC Derivatives Market Activity in Second Half of 2007” (BIS) Monetary and Economic Department, May 21. Papademos, Lucas Vice President of the ECB, Speech to International Symposium of the Banque de France, “Monetary Policy, the Economic Cycle and Financial Dynamics” Paris, March 7, 2003 22. Raghuram Rajan, Economic Counsellor and Director of Research Department, The International Monetary Fund. Speech at the Global Financial Imbalances Conference, London, United Kingdom, January 23, 2006 23. Summers, Peter M. 2005 What Caused The Great Moderation? Some Cross-Country Evidence URL: http://www.kc.frb.org/Publicat/Econrev/PDF/3q05summ.pdf 24. Professor Axel A Weber, “Financial Markets and Monetary Policy” Speech by the President of the Deutsche Bundesbank, at the CEPR/ESI 12th Annual Conference “The Evolving Financial System and the Transmission Mechanism of Montary Policy”, co-organised by BIS – Bank of International Settlements, Basel, 25-26 September 2008 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/13487 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
The Great Moderation and the New Business Cycle. (deposited 19 Dec 2008 00:09)
- The Great Moderation and the New Business Cycle. (deposited 20 Feb 2009 08:38) [Currently Displayed]