Endogenous technological progress and the cross section of stock returns

Lin, Xiaoji (2009): Endogenous technological progress and the cross section of stock returns.

Abstract

I study the cross sectional variation of stock returns and technological progress using a dynamic equilibrium model with production. In the model, technological progress is endogenously driven by R&D investment and is composed of two parts. One part is product innovation devoted to creating new products; the other part is dedicated to increasing the productivity of physical investment and is embodied in new tangible capital (e.g., structures and equipment). The model breaks the symmetry assumed in standard models between intangible capital and tangible capital, in which the accumulation processes of tangible capital stock and intangible capital stock do not affect each other. The model explains qualitatively and in many cases quantitatively well-documented empirical regularities: (i) the positive relation between R&D investment and the average stock returns; (ii) the negative relation between physical investment and the average stock returns; and (iii) the positive relation between book-to-market ratio and the average stock returns.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Technological Progress, R&D Investment, Physical Investment, Stock Return
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook

References

Berk, J., R. Green, and V. Naik. 1999. Optimal investment, growth options and security returns. Journal of Finance 54: 1153--1607. Campbell, J., M Lettau, B Malkiel, and Y Xu. 2001. Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Finance LVI: 1-43. Campbell, J., and J. Cochrane. 1999. By force of habit: a consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior. Journal of Political Economy 107: 205-251. Carlson, M., A. Fisher, and R. Giammarino. 2004. Corporate investment and asset price dynamics: Implications for the cross-section of returns. Journal of Finance 59: 2577--2603. Chan, L., J. Lakonishok, and T. Sougiannis. 2001. The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. Journal of Finance 56: 2431--2456. Cochrane, J. 1991. Production-based asset pricing and the link between stock returns and economic fluctuations. Journal of Finance 46 (1): 209--237. ---------. 1996. A cross-sectional test of an investment-based asset pricing model. Journal of Political Economy, 104: 572-621. ---------. 2001, Asset Pricing, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Cohen, W., and S Klepper. 1996. Firm size and the nature of innovation with industries: the case of process and product R&D. The review of Economics and Statistics 78: 232-243. Cooper, A. 2006. Asset pricing implications of nonconvex adjustment costs and irreversibility of investment. Journal of Finance 61: 139--170. Evans, D. 1987. The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries, Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 567--581. Fisher, J. 2006. The dynamic effects of neutral and investment-specific technology shocks. Journal of Political Economy 114: 413--451. Fama, E., and K French. 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance XLVII: 427-465. ---------. 1993. Common risk factors in return of stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33: 3-56. ---------. 1995, Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns, Journal of Finance 50: 131--155. Hall, B. 1987. The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the U.S. manufacturing sector, Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 583--606. Greenwood, J., Z. Hercowitz, and P. Krusell. 1997. Long-run implications of investment-specific technological change. American Economic Review 87 (3): 342--362. ---------. 2000. The role of investment-specific technological change in the business cycle. European Economic Review 44 (1): 91--115. Greenwood, J., and B. Jovanovic. 1999. The IT revolution and the stock market. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 89 (2): 116-122. Hansen, L., J. Heaton and N. Li. 2004. Intangible risk? Working paper, University of Chicago. Hennessy, C., and T. Whited. 2005. Debt dynamics. Journal of Finance 60: 1129-1165. Hsu, P. P. 2006. Aggregate productivity shocks and market return predictability. Working paper, University of Connecticut. Huffman, G. 2007. Endogenous growth through investment-specific technological change. Review of Economic Dynamics, Forthcoming. Jermann, U. 1998. Asset pricing in production economy. Journal of Monetary Economics 41: 257--275. King, R., and S. Rebelo. 1999. Resuscitating real business cycles. In Handbook of Macroeconomics, 927--1007, eds. John Taylor and Michael Woodford. Oxford: North-Holland. Lach, S., and R. Rob. 1996. R&D, investment, and industry dynamics. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 5: 217--249. Lamont, O. 2000. Investment plans and stock returns. Journal of Finance 55 (6): 2719-2745. Levin, R., and P Reiss. 1988. Cost-reducing and demand-creating R&D with spillovers. The Rank Journal of Economics 19: 538-556. Li, D. 2006. Financial constraints, R&D investment, and stock returns: Theory and evidend. Working paper, University of California at San Diego. Li, X. N. E., D. Livdan and L. Zhang. 2008. Anomalies. Review of Financial Studies, Forthcoming. Lin, Ping., and Saggi Kamal. 2002. Product differentiation, process R&D and the nature of market competition. European Economic Review 46: 201-211. Liu, X. L. , T. Whited and L. Zhang. 2007, Regularities. Working paper, University of Michigan. Lustig, H., C. Syverson, and S. Van Nieuwerburgh. 2008. IT, Corporate Payouts, and Growing Inequality in Managerial Compensation. Working Paper, UCLA, University of Chicago and NYU. McGrattan, E. 1999. Application of weighted residual methods to dynamic economic models. In Computational Methods for the Study of Dynamic Economies, Chapter 6, eds. R. Marimon and A. Scott. Oxford: Oxford University Press. McGrattan, E., and E. Prescott. 2005. Taxes, regulations, and the value of U.S. and U.K. corporations. Review of Economic Studies 72: 767--796. Romer, P. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Policy Economy 98 (5): 72--102. Rouwenhorst, G. 1995. Asset pricing implications of equilibrium business cycle models, in Thomas Cooley, eds. Frontiers of Business Cycle Research. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. Titman, S., J Wei, and F Xie, 2004. Capital investments and stock returns, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39: 677-700. Vuolteenaho, T. 2001. What drives the firm level stock returns? Journal of Finance 57: 233-264. Xing, Y. 2006. Interpreting the value effect through the Q-theory: an empirical investigation. Review of Financial Studies, Forthcoming. Zhang, L., 2005. The value premium. Journal of Finance 60 (1): 67--103.