Haq, Mirajul and Usman Mustafa, Usman and Ahmad, Iftikhar (2008): Household’s willingness to pay for safe drinking water: A case study of Abbottabad district. Published in: The Pakistan Development Review , Vol. 46, No. 4 (2007): pp. 1137-1153.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_15208.pdf Download (262kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study is based on survey data and used both the contingent valuation method and averting behaviour approach to capture HH's willingness to pay for services and quality in the drinking water sector. In case of the HH’s WTP for improved water services, the study estimates that there is statistically significant effect of location that in urban areas, HHs has more WTP for improved water services. The study also finds that sources of water have a significant effect on WTP i.e. the HH who have own source are willing to pay in the higher range (Rs 51–100) further tap water has significant effect on WTP for the first two quartiles. As expected, education level ignificantly affects WTP for safe drinking water.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Household’s willingness to pay for safe drinking water: A case study of Abbottabad district |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | contingent valuation, averting behaviour, household survey, willingness to pay, Pakistan |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 15208 |
Depositing User: | Iftikhar Ahmad |
Date Deposited: | 14 May 2009 07:28 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 04:39 |
References: | Abdalla, C. W., B. A. Roach, and D. J. Epp (1992) Valuing Environmental Quality Changes Using Averting Expenditures: An Application to the Ground—Water Contamination. Land Economics 68: (May), 163–69. Abrahams, N. A, Bryan J. Hubbell, and Jeffery L. Jordan (2000) Joint Production and Averting Expenditure Measures of Willingness to Pay: Do Water Expenditures Really Measure Avoidance Costs? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 : (May), 427–37. Altaf, M. A., Haroon Jamal, and Dale Whittington (1992) Willingness to pay for Water in Rural Punjab, Pakistan. UNDP–World Bank, Water and Sanitation Programme. Washington, DC, World Bank. (Water and Sanitation Report No. 4.) Bergstrom, John C., Kevin J. Boyle, Charles A. Job, and Mary Jo Kealy (1996)Assessing the Economic Benefits of Groundwater for Environmental Policy Decisions. Water Resources Bulletin 32, 279–291. Bresnahan, Brain, Mark Dickie, and Shelby Gerking (1997) Averting Behaviour and Urban Air Pollution. Land Economics 73:3, 340–357. Chowdhury, N. T. (1999) Willingness to Pay for Water in Dhaka Slum: A Contingent Valuation Study. IUCN. Collins, A. R. and S. Steinbeck (1993) Rural Household Response to Water Contamination in West Virginia. Water Resource Bulletin 199–209. Crocker,T. D., B. A. Forster, and J. F. Shogren (1991) Valuing potential Groundwater Protection Benefits. Water Resources Research 27, 1–6. Cropper, Maureen L., and A. Myrick Freeman III (1991) Environmental Health Effects.In J. B. Braden and C. D. Kolstad (ed.) Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. North-Holland. Frank.R, Rijserman, and J. C. Willian (2000) Making Water Every Body Business. World Water Council. Freeman, A. Myrick III (1993) The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values Theory and Methods. Resources for the Future, CA. Harrington, Winston, Alan J. Krupnick, and Walter A. Spofford (1989) The Economic Losses of a Waterborne Disease Outbreak. Journal of Urban Economics 25, 116–137. IUCN (2004a) Abbottabad: State of the Environment and Development. International Union for the Conservation of Natural Resources (IUCN), Pakistan Sarhad Programme, Government of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP), Planning and Development Department, Peshawar. IUCN (2004b) Abbottabad: An Integrated Development Vision. International Union for the Conservation of Natural Resources (IUCN), Pakistan Sarhad Programme, Government of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP), Planning and Development Department, Peshawar. Laughland, A. S, L. M. Musser, W. N. Musser, and J. S. Shortle (1993) The Opportunity Cost of Time and Averting Expenditures for Safe Drinking Water. Water Resources Bulletin 29:2, 219–299. Mitchell, Robert Cameron and Richard T. Carson (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future. Washington, DC. Pakistan, Government of (2006) Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey. Federal Bureau of Statistics, Islamabad. Rosemann, Nils (2005) Drinking Water Crises in Pakistan and the Issue of Bottled Water: The Case of Nestlé’s Pure Life. Actionaid Pakistan. Smith, V. K. (1991) Household Production Models. Chapter III. In John B. Barden and Charles D. Kolstad (eds.) Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. North Holland. Smith, V. K. and W. H. Desvouges (1986) Averting Behaviour; Does it Exits? Economics Letters 20:3, 291–96. Whitehead, John C. and George Van Houtven (1998) Methods for Valuing the Benefits of the Safe Drinking Water Act: Review and Assessment. East Carolina University Working Paper. Whittington, D., J. Briscoe, X. Mu, and W. Barron (1990) Estimating Willingness to Pay for Water Services in Developing Countries: A Case Study of the Use of Contingent Valuation Survey in Southern Haiti. Economic Development and Cultural Change 38, 293–311. World Bank (1994) Infrastructure for Development at Target. Viewed March 2008 at http/target.com/world-Development-Report-1994-Infrastructure/ap/0821325353. World Bank (2006) Pakistan: Strategic Country Environmental Assessment. South Asia Environment and Social Unit. The World Bank, Islamabad, Pakistan. World Health Organisation (2004) The World Health Report 2002. Geneva: WHO Switzerland. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/15208 |