Drakopoulos, Stavros A. (1997): Origins and Development of the Trend towards Value-Free Economics. Published in: Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Vol. 19, No. 2 (1997): pp. 286-300.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_15245.pdf Download (92kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The vast majority of pre-Classical and of many Classical economists thought that it was natural to incorporate value judgments and norms in their economic reasoning. However, there was a gradual dominance of the idea of a neutral or value-free economic science which gained momentum with the second Marginalist generation. More specifically, clear signs of this tendency can be found in the works of Sidgwick, Pareto and Fisher. The paper examines the process of this change and provides possible justifications. In particular, the work discusses this trend with reference to the growing influence of classical physics, and positivist philosophies of science. Consequently, the paper shows that there was a gradual broadening of the meaning of the term “value judgments” to include mental states and motivations. These developments are essential in the understanding of the formation of the standard economic theory and especially of microeconomic theory.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Origins and Development of the Trend towards Value-Free Economics |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Economic Methodology, Values and Economics, History of Economic Thought |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B0 - General > B00 - General B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology |
Item ID: | 15245 |
Depositing User: | Stavros A. Drakopoulos |
Date Deposited: | 16 May 2009 13:48 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 20:48 |
References: | Blaug, M.1980. The Methodology of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Blaug, M. 1985. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 4th edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cairnes, J. 1875. The Character and Logical Method of Political Economy, London: Macmillan. Carnap, R. 1981. “Protocol Statements and the Formal Mode of Speech” in O. Hanfling (ed.) Logical Positivism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Coats, A. W. 1976. “Economics and Psychology: the Death and Resurrection of a Research Program”, in S. Latsis (ed.) Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Coddington, A. 1972. “Positive Economics”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 5, pp.1-15. Colander, D. 1994. “The Art of Economics by the Numbers”, in R. Backhouse (ed.) New Directions in Economic Methodology, London: Routledge. Daston, L. 1992. “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective”, Socials Studies of Science, 22, pp.597-618. Dear, P. 1992. “From Truth to Disinterestedness in the Seventeenth Century, Social Studies of Science, 22, pp.619-31. Drakopoulos, S. 1989. “The Historical Perspective of the Problem of Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility”, Journal of Economic Studies, 16, pp. 23-51. Drakopoulos, S. 1991. Values and Economic Theory, Aldershot: Gower-Avebury. Friedman, M. 1984 (1953). "The Methodology of Economics" in D. Hausman (ed.), The Philosophy of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fisher, I. 1965. Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Price, New York: Augustus M. Kelley. Gide, C and Rist, C. 1915. A History of Economic Doctrines, London: George Harrp. Gordon, S. 1977. “Social Science and Value Judgements”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 10, pp.529-46. Gray, A. 1931. The Development of Economic Doctrine, London: Longman. Hanfling, O. 1981. Logical Positivism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Hicks, J. 1939. The Foundations of Welfare Economics, The Economic Journal, 49, pp.696-712. Hicks, J. 1946. Value and Capital, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hicks J. and Allen, R.G.D. 1934. “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value, Economica, 1, pp.52-76. Hume, D. 1826. “Of Standards of Taste”, in Philosophical Works, vol.3, Hutchison, T.W. 1964. Positive Economics and Policy Objectives, London: Allen and Unwin. Hutchison, T.W. 1981. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Jevons, S. 1871. The Theory of Political Economy, London: Macmillan. Karayiannis, A. 1995. History of Economic Methodology, Athens: Interbooks (in Greek). Keynes, J.N. 1904. The Scope and Method of Political Economy, New York: Macmillan. Leamer, E. 1983. “Let’s take the con out of Econometrics”, American Economic Review, 75, pp.31-43. Lipsey, R. 1983. Positive Economics, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Loomes, G and Sugden, R. 1983. “A Rationale for Preference Reversal”, American Economic Review, 73, pp.428-32. Machlup, F. 1984. "Professor Samuelson on Theory and Realism" in B. Caldwell (ed.) Appraisal and Criticism in Economics, London: Allen and Unwin. Mayer, T. 1993. Truth versus Precision in Economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar. Menger, C. 1963. Problems of Economics and Sociology, transl. by F. Nack, Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Mill, J. S. 1874. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, London: Longman. Mirowski, P. 1989. More Heat than Light, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mirowski, P. 1991. “The When, How and the Why of the Mathematical Expression in the History of Economic Analysis”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, pp.145-57. Myrdal, G. 1953. The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Nagel, E. 1961. The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pareto, V. 1971. Manual of Political Economy, transl. by A Schwier, London: Macmillan. Porter, T. 1992. “Quantification and the Accounting Ideal in Science”, Social Studies of Science, 22, pp.633-51. Robbins, L. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan. Robbins, L. 1938. “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment, The Economic Journal, 48, pp.635-41. Samuelson, P. 1938. “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behavior”, Economica, 5, pp.61-71. Schumpeter, J. 1954. History of Economic Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press. Sidgwick, H. 1883. The Principles of Political Economy, London. Smith, A. 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, by D. Raphael and A. Macfie (eds), Oxford: Clarendon Press. Sugden R. 1981. The Political Economy of Public Choice, Oxford: Martin Roberstson. Walras, L. 1965. Elements of Pure Economics, transl. by W. Jaffe, London: Allen and Unwin. Weber, M. 1984. “Objectivity and Understanding in Economics”, in D. Hausman (ed.), The Philosophy of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wicksteed, P. 1933. The Common Sense of Political Economy, London: Routledge. Winch, D. 1972. “Marginalism and the Boundaries of Economic Science, History of Political Economy, 4, pp.325-343. Wong, S. 1978. The Foundations of Paul Samuelson’s Revealed Preference Theory, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/15245 |