A growth model with time allocation and social participation

Bassetti, Thomas and Favaro, Donata (2009): A growth model with time allocation and social participation.

Abstract

In this article we propose a model of growth with human capital accumulation, in which individuals allocate their time among work, education and socio-political participation. Socio-political participation, while subtracting time to education, positively affects individual’s utility; the utility function depends on both consumption and time allocated to socio-political participation. The model is expanded to include two social groups, specifically women and men, whose values and targets are different; every individual engages in socio-political activities to socially establish the values of the group she/he belongs to and his utility will be greater the more the society has values similar to those of the belonging group. The model predicts that economies with a more egualitarian presence of females and males in employment and higher population growth rates converge to a stationary state where time allocated to working activities is lower and time for education is higher. We simulate the model on some European countries with different female/male employment rates, population growth rates and capital shares. Simulations confirm the empirical evidence: European countries with a more equal presence of women and men in the labour market experience higher education attainment rates, allocate a higher proportion of time to social participation, and work, on average, a lower number of hours than countries with a lower relative proportion of females in employment.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: human capital; growth; socio-political participation; social groups; gender
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity

References

Akerlof G:A. and R.E. Kranton, 2000, Economics and Identity, Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXV, 3, 715-753.

Antoci A., Sacco P.L. and P. Vanin, 2007, Social Capital Accumulation and the Evolution of Social Participation, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 128-143.

Brady H., Verba S. and K.L. Schlozman, 1995, Beyond Ses: A Resource Model of Political Participation, The American Political Science Review, 89, 2, 271-294.

Caballé J. and M.S. Santos, 1993, On Endogenous Growth With Physical And Human Capital, Journal of Political Economy, 101, 1042-1068.

Cronos R. and U. Gneezy, 2009, Gender Differneces in Preferences, Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448-474.

Eurostat, 2005, Comparable Time Use Statistics. National tables from 10 European countries. European Commission.

Eurostat, 2006, Comparable Time Use Statistics. Main results for Spain, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. European Commission.

Frey B.S., 1971, Why Do High Income People Participate More in Politics?, Public Choice, 11, 100-105.

Frey B.S. and M. Kucher, 2002, People Pay for Power, in Holler M.J., Kliemt H., Schmidtchen D. and E.M.Streit (eds), Power and Fairness, Mohr Siebeck, 146-167.

Ladrón-de-Guevara A., Ortigueira S. and M.S. Santos, 1997, Equilibrium Dynamics In Two-Sector Models of Endogenous Growth, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21, 115-143.

Lane R.E., 1966, Political Involvement Through Voting, in Seasholes (ed.), Voting, Interest Groups and Parties, Glenview.

Lucas R.E. Jr, 1988, On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.

OECD, 2008, Education at a Glance.

Russell K.P., 1972, Political Participation and Income Level: an Exchange, Public Choice, 13, 113-114.

Sturgill B., 2009, Cross-country Variation in Factor Shares and its Implications for Development Accounting, Working Papers n. 09-07, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.