Reference-dependent preferences in the public and private sectors: A nonlinear perspective

Georgellis, Yannis and Gregoriou, Andros and Tsitsianis, Nikolaos (2009): Reference-dependent preferences in the public and private sectors: A nonlinear perspective.

Abstract

Although existing studies in the strategic management literature examine the importance of reference points in the context of managerial decisions vis-à-vis organizational performance, there is surprisingly little evidence on how reference earnings affect employees' wellbeing and behavior. The present study closes this gap by investigating adaptation dynamics towards reference earnings in the context of employees’ behavioral responses to social comparisons. We argue that a wedge between actual and aspiration-level earnings causes discontent that spurs employees into action to materialize their aspirations. The robustness of such action depends on the size of the wedge in a nonlinear fashion, a hypothesis supported by our findings. Nevertheless, heterogeneity in behavioral responses is evident across the public and private sectors and across gender and educational attainment. Such heterogeneity could be partially attributed to differences in public service motivation among public and private sector employees, to the different weights that employees place on pecuniary vs. non-pecuniary rewards, and whether reference earnings are likely to trigger behavioral responses through a 'jealousy' or through an 'ambition' channel. These findings have implications for the design of strategic human resource management policies to establish reward structures encouraging employees to adopt risk attitudes that are consistent with an overall business strategic plan.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: adaptation; reference earnings; comparison income; reference-dependent preferences; ESTAR models
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets > J45 - Public Sector Labor Markets; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables

References

Bender K, Elliott R. 2002. The role of job attributes in understanding the public-private wage differential. Industrial Relations, 41 (3): 407-421.

Bowling N, Beehr T, Wagner S, Libkuman T. 2005. Adaptation-level theory, opponent process theory, and dispositions: An integrated approach to the stability of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 1044-1053.

Brickman P, Coates D, Janoff-Bulman, R. 1978. Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36: 917-927.

Bromiley P. 1991. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance'. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 37-59.

Brown G, Gardner J, Oswald A, Qian, J. 2008. Does wage rank affect employees' wellbeing? Industrial Relations, 47: 355-389.

Clark A, Diener E, Georgellis Y, Lucas R. 2008. Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal, 118: F222-F243.

Clark A, Oswald A. 1996. Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61: 359-381.

Cyert R.M, March J.G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Easterlin R. 2005. A puzzle for adaptive theory. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 56: 513-521.

Farber H. 2008. Reference-dependent preferences and labor supply: The case of New York City taxi drivers. American Economic Review, 98: 1069-1082.

Ferrer-I-Carbonell A. 2005. Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 5-6: 997-1019.

Fiegenbaum A. 1990. Prospect theory and the risk-return association. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 14: 187-203.

Fiegenbaum A, Thomas T. 1988. Attitudes towards risk and the risk-return paradox: prospect theory explanations. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 85-106.

Fiegenbaum A, Thomas H. 1995. Strategic groups as reference groups: theory, modeling and empirical examination of industry and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 461-476.

Fiegenbaum A, Hart S, Schendel D. 1996. Strategic reference point theory. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 219-235.

Fliessbach K, Weber B, Trautner P, Dohmen T, Sunde U, Elger C.E, Falk A. 2007. Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum. Science, 318, 5854: 1305-1308.

Granger C, Terasvirta T. 1993. Modelling nonlinear economic relationships, Oxford University Press.

Greve H.R. 1998. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 58-86.

Grinyer P.H, McKiernan P. 1990. Generating major change in stagnating companies. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 131-146.

Headey B, Wearing A. 1989. Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 731-39.

Helson H. 1964. Current trends and issues in adaptation-level theory. American Psychologist, 19: 26-38.

Hirschman A. 1973. The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87: 544–566.

Hundley G. 1991. Public and private sector occupational pay structures. Industrial Relations, 30: 417-434.

Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47: 263-291.

Kahn L. 2008. The impact of wage-setting institutions on the incidence of public employment in the OECD: 1960-1998. Industrial Relations, 47: 329-354.

Katz L, Krueger A. 1991. Changes in the structure of wages in the public and private sectors. Research in Labor Economics, 12: 137-172.

Lehner J. 2000. Shifts of reference points for framing of strategic decisions and changing riskreturn associations. Management Science, 46 1): 63-76.

Lucas R. 2007. Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: Does happiness change after major life events? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16: 75-79.

Lucas R, Clark A, Georgellis Y, Diener E. 2003. Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 527-539.

Lucas R, Clark A, Georgellis Y, Diener E. 2004. Unemployment alters the set point of life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15: 8-13.

Lykken D, Tellegen A. 1996. Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7:186-189.

Mas A. 2006. Pay, reference points, and police performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 121: 783-821.

McBride M. 2001. Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 45: 251-278.

Mezias S, Chen Y-R, Murphy P. 2002. Aspiration-level adaptation in an American financial services organization: A field study. Management Science, 48 10): 1285-1298.

Perry J.L. 1996. Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6: 5-22.

Rizzo J, Zeckhauser R. 2003. Reference incomes, loss aversion, and physician behavior. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85: 909-922.

Senik C. 2008. Ambition and jealousy: Income interactions in the 'old' Europe versus the 'new' Europe and the United States. Economica, 75: 495-513.

Singh J. V. 1986. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 562-585.

Stutzer A. 2004. The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 54: 89-109.

Terasvirta T, Anderson H. 1992. Characterizing nonlinearities in business cycles using smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7: S119-S139.

Terasvirta T. 1994. Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89: 208-218.

van Praag B, Ferrer-I-Carbonell A. 2004. Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.