Hardiansyah, Suteja (2009): The Death of Theology: The Complexity of the New Islamic Theology (Al-Kalam Al-Jadid) in Philosophy of Moral (Kematian Teologi: Kompleksitas Teologi Islam Baru dalam Dimensi Etika).
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_18049.pdf Download (831kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In the contemporary era, issues that emerged in ethics is not just simply a matter of quality of one's behavior toward other people directly, but also new issues like bioethics, nuclear, technology in general, environmental crisis, etc. This paper is to discuss new issues that emerge in contemporary debates in ethics and see how the new Islamic Theology (Kalam al-Jadid) highlighted it. The conclusion of this paper is the New Islamic Theology can not embrace the new problems that emerged in ethics and also failed to adapt the complexity system in ethics. This happens due to evolutionary ethics does not happen in ethics dimension of the theology.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Death of Theology: The Complexity of the New Islamic Theology (Al-Kalam Al-Jadid) in Philosophy of Moral (Kematian Teologi: Kompleksitas Teologi Islam Baru dalam Dimensi Etika) |
English Title: | The Death of Theology: The Complexity of the New Islamic Theology (Al-Kalam Al-Jadid) in Philosophy of Moral |
Language: | Indonesian |
Keywords: | cultural evolution, evolutionary ethics, New Islamic Theology (al-Kalam al-Jadid), complexity, emergence, meme, complex adaptive systems |
Subjects: | Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z12 - Religion Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General > Z00 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification Y - Miscellaneous Categories > Y8 - Related Disciplines > Y80 - Related Disciplines |
Item ID: | 18049 |
Depositing User: | Hardiansyah Suteja |
Date Deposited: | 22 Oct 2009 02:37 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 20:40 |
References: | [1] Arkoun, Mohammed "Rethinking Islam Today" dalam The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2003; 588; 18-39. Diakses secara online dari http://ann.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/588/1/18 pada 24 April 2009. [2] Bell, Jr., Daniel M. 2001/2005. Liberation Theology After the End of History: The Refusal to Cease Suffering. USA: Routledge/Taylor & Francis e-Library. [3] Denny, Frederick Matheson “Muslim Ethical Trajectories in the Contemporary Period” dalam William Schweiker (ed.). 2005. The Blackwell Companion to Religious Ethics. UK: Blackwell Publishing. hal. 268-277. [4] ter Haar, Gerrie & Yoshio Tsuruoka (ed.). 2007. Religion and Society: An Agenda for the 21st Century. Leiden: Brill. [5] Hashmi, Sohail H. & Steven P. Lee (ed). 2004. Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives. USA: Cambridge University Press. [6] Ramadan, Tariq. 2004. Western Muslims and the Future of Islam. USA: Oxford University Press. [7] Rippin, Andrew. 1993/2004. Muslim: Their Religious Belief and Practices. Volume 2: The Contemporary Period. USA: Routledge/Taylor & Francis e-Library [8] Said, Abdul Aziz, Mohammed Abu-Nimer & Meena Sharify-Funk (ed.). 2006. Contemporary Islam: Dynamic, not Static. USA: Routledge/Francis & Taylor e-Library [9] Sorabji, Richard & David Rodin (ed.). 2006. The Ethics of War: Shared Problems in Different Traditions. England: Ashgate Publishing. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/18049 |