The Moral High Ground: An Experimental Study of Spectator Impartiality

Konow, James (2008): The Moral High Ground: An Experimental Study of Spectator Impartiality.

Abstract

This paper proposes and tests an empirical model of impartiality, inspired by Adam Smith (1759), that is based on the moral judgments of informed third parties (or spectators). The model predicts that spectatorship produces properties widely considered desirable in both the normative and descriptive literature of philosophy and the social sciences, namely, unbiasedness and consensus. This informs a vignette experiment that elicits moral judgments about real world policy issues while varying the information conditions (relevant and irrelevant information) and roles (spectator and stakeholder) of respondents across treatments. The results indicate that spectator views are unbiased, and that relevant information reduces stakeholder bias to insignificance, whereas irrelevant information reduces bias but does not eliminate it. Relevant information promotes a kind of consensus among both spectators and stakeholders. I argue that this model can inform descriptive and prescriptive political analysis and that it complements empirical work on deliberation and public opinion.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: impartiality, spectator, consensus, deliberation, bias
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General; D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D30 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C90 - General; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General

References

Amiel, Yoram, Frank A. Cowell, and Wulf Gaertner. 2008. "To Be or not to Be Involved: A Questionnaire-Experimental View on Harsanyi's Utilitarian Ethics," forthcoming in Social Choice and Welfare.

Ashraf, Nava, Colin Camerer, and George Loewenstein. 2005. "Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist." Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (Summer): 109-26.

Babcock, Linda, and George Loewenstein. 1997. "Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases." Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (Winter): 109-26.

Barabas, Jason. 2004. "How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions." American Political Science Review 98 (November): 687-701.

Croson, Rachel, and James Konow. 2008. "Social Preferences and Moral Biases," Department of Economics, forthcoming in the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.

Dryzek, John S., and Simon Niemeyer. 2006. "Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals." American Journal of Political Science 50 (July): 634-49.

Dunning, David, Judith A. Meyerowitz, and Amy D. Holzberg. 1989. "Ambiguity and Self-Evaluation: The Role of Idiosyncratic Trait Definitions in Self-Serving Assessments of Ability." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (December): 1082-90.

Faravelli, Marco. 2007. "How Context Matters: A Survey Based Experiment on Distributive Justice." Journal of Public Economics 91 (August): 1399-422.

Fishkin, James A., and Robert C. Luskin. 2005. "Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion." Acta Politica 40: 284-98.

Fishkin, James. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Fleischacker, Samuel. 1999. A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Fricke, Christel, and Hans-Peter Schutt, ed. 2005. Adam Smith Als Moralphilosoph. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.

Frohlich, Norman, and Joe A. Oppenheimer. 1992. Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Frohlich, Norman, Joe A. Oppenheimer, and Cheryl L. Eavey. 1987. "Choices of Principles of Distributive Justice in Experimental Groups." American Journal of Political Science 31 (August): 606-36.

Fung, Archon. 2007. "Democratic Theory and Political Science: A Pragmatic Method of Constructive Engagement." American Political Science Review 101 (August): 443-58.

Goldstein, William M., and Elke U. Weber. 1995. "Content and Discontent: Indication and Implications of Domain Specificity in Preferential Decision Making." Psychology of Learning and Motivation 32: 83-136.

Griswold, Charles L. 1999. Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haakonssen, Knud. 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo: Cambridge University Press.

Habermas, Jurgen. 1990[1983]. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Trans. Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholson. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Hanley, Ryan Patrick. 2008. "Enlightened Nation Building; the ‘Science of the Legislator’ in Adam Smith and Rousseau." American Journal of Political Science 52 (April): 219-34.

Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard Thaler. 1986. "Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market." American Economic Review 76 (September): 728-41.

Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Jane Mansbridge. 2005. "Disagreement and Consensus: The Importance of Dynamic Updating in Public Deliberation." In ed. John Gastil and Peter Levine. The Deliberative Democracy Handbook, 237-53. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

Knobe, Joshua. 2007. "Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Significance." Philosophical Explorations 10 (June): 119-21.

Konow, James. 2000. "Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions." American Economic Review 90 (September): 1072-92.

Konow, James. 2003. "Which is the Fairest One of All?: A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories." Journal of Economic Literature 41 (December): 1188-239.

Konow, James. 2005. "Blind Spots: The Effects of Information and Stakes on Fairness Bias and Dispersion." Social Justice Research 18 (December): 349-90.

Konow, James. 2008. "Is Fairness in the Eye of the Beholder? An Impartial Spectator Analysis of Justice," Social Choice and Welfare 33 (1): 101-127.

List, Christian, Robert C. Luskin, James S. Fishkin, and Iain McLean. 2007. "Deliberation, Single-Peakedness, and the Possibility of Meaningful Democracy: Evidence from Deliberative Polls," Department of Government, London School of Economics, University of Texas at Austin, Stanford University, Oxford University, 4/January.

Mansbridge, Jane J. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

Michelbach, Philip A., John T. Scott, Richard E. Matland, and Brian H. Bornstein. 2003. "Doing Rawls Justice: An Experimental Study of Income Distribution Norms." American Journal of Political Science 47 (July): 523-39.

Mitchell, Gregory, and Philip E. Tetlock. 2006. "Experimental Political Philosophy: Justice Judgments in the Hypothetical Society Paradigm," University of Virginia School of Law; Haas School of Business at University of California, Berkeley, 29/June.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1996. "Democracy, Power and 'the Political'." In ed. Seyla Benhabib. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, 245-56. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Nadelhoffer, Thomas, and Eddy Nahmias. 2007. "The Past and Future of Experimental Philosophy." Philosophical Explorations 10 (June): 123-49.

Neblo, Michael A. 2007. "Change for the Better? Linking the Mechanisms of Deliberative Opinion Change to Normative Theory," http://polisci.osu.edu/faculty/mneblo/papers/ChangeC4.pdf.

Nichols, Shaun. 2004. "After Objectivity: An Empirical Study of Moral Judgment." Philosophical Psychology 17 (March): 5-28.

Nyborg, Karine, and Kjell Arne Brekke. 2007. "A Model of Work Motivation: Reconciling 'Wealth of Nations' and 'Moral Sentiments'," manuscript, University of Oslo, Norway.

Parrish, John M. 2007. Paradoxes of Political Ethics: From Dirty Hands to the Invisible Hand. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo: Cambridge University Press.

Raphael, D. D. 2007. The Impartial Spectator. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Rawls, John. 2000. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.

Shapiro, Ian. 2002. "Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What's Wrong with Political Science and What to Do About It." Political Theory 30 (August): 596-619.

Smith, Adam. 1759 [1809]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Glasgow: R. Chapman.

Sulkin, Tracy, and Adam F. Simon. 2001. "Habermas in the Lab: A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting." Political Psychology 22 (December): 809-26.

Traub, Stefan, Christian Seidl, Ulrich Schmidt, and Maria Vittoria Levati. 2005. "Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding - or Somebody Else? an Experimental Investigation of Distributive Justice." Social Choice and Welfare 24: 283-309.

Young, Iris. 1996. "Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy." In ed. Seyla Benhabib. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, 120-37. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Zaller, John, and Stanley Feldman. 1992. "A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions Versus Revealing Preferences." American Journal of Political Science 36 (August): 579-616.