Gilroy, Bernard Michael and Lukas, Elmar (2005): The Choice between Greenfield Investment and Cross-border Acquisition: A Real Option Approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_18819.pdf Download (566kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to formalize the choice of market entry strategy for an individual multinational enterprise (MNE) from a dynamic perspective. It is argued that incorporating a suitable treatment of irreversibility, uncertainty and flexibility related to a MNEs investment decision gives further insights to the choice of cross-border acquisitions to greenfield investment as the preferred entry mode. In most cases, the initial entry strategy serves as a platform allowing the firm to make subsequent investments to exploit host-country advantages and capabilities.We allowfor this by taking a two-step expansion strategy explicitly into account. The evolutionary process of the value of the foreign direct investment includes two stochastic elements as well as the timing that triggers the transition from export to foreign direct investment. The results suggest that uncertainty and future investment opportunities play an important role when it comes to transit from export to the first phase of the foreign direct investment commitment as well as have an impact on the choice of entry strategy.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Choice between Greenfield Investment and Cross-border Acquisition: A Real Option Approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Foreign direct investment; Multinational enterprise; Sequential investments; Entry mode; Greenfield investment; Cross-border acquisition |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G31 - Capital Budgeting ; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies ; Capacity F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D92 - Intertemporal Firm Choice, Investment, Capacity, and Financing |
Item ID: | 18819 |
Depositing User: | Bernard Michael Gilroy |
Date Deposited: | 23 Nov 2009 15:24 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 04:02 |
References: | Agarwal, S., & Ramaswami, S. (1992). Choice of foreign entry mode: Impact of ownership, location, and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23, 1–27. Andersson, T., & Svensson, R. (1996). Entry modes of direct investment determined by the composition of firm-specific skills. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 96 (4), 551–560. Baldwin, R.,&Krugman, P. (1989). Persistent trade effects of large exchange rate stocks. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 636–654. Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. London: Macmillan Publishing. Broll, U., & Eckwert, B. (1999). Exchange rate volatility and international trade. Southern Economic Journal, 66 (1), 178–185. Buckley, A., & Tse, K. (1996). Real operating options and foreign direct investment: A synthetic approach. European Management Journal, 14 (3), 304–314. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1981). The optimal timing of a foreign direct investment. The Economic Journal, 91, 75–87. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1998a). Models of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (1), 21–44. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1998b). Analyzing foreign market entry strategies: Extending the international approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (3), 539–562. Bulan, L. T. (2001). Real options, irreversible investment and firm uncertainty: New evidence from U.S. firms (International Business School Working Paper Series). Waltham, MA: Brandeis University. Caves, R., & Mehra, S. K. (1986). Entry of foreign multinationals into U.S. manufacturing industries. In M. E. Porter (Ed.), Competition in global industries (pp.449–481). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Chang, S. -J., & Rosenzweig, P. M. (2001). The choice of entry mode in sequential foreign direct investment. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 747–776. Clark, E. (1997). Valuing political risk. Journal of International Money and Finance, 16 (3), 477–490. Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Dixit, A. K. (1989). Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 620–638. Dubin, M. (1976). Foreign acquisitions and the spread of the multinational firm, D.B.A. thesis, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Dunning, J. H. (1980). Towards an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11 (1), 9–31. Friedl, G. (2002). Sequential investment and time to build. Schmalenbach Business Review, 54 (1), 58–79. Geske, R. (1979). The valuation of compound options. Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (1), 63–81. Gomez-Casseres, B. (1989). Ownership structure of foreign subsidiaries. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 11, 1–25. Görg, H. (2000). Analysing foreign market entry: The choice between greenfield investment and acquisition. Journal of Economic Studies, 27 (3), 165–181. Hennart, J. F., & Park, Y. R. (1993). Greenfield vs. acquisition: The strategy of Japanese investors in the United States. Management Science, 39 (9), 1054–1070. Hirsch, S. (1976). An international trade and investment theory of the firm. Oxford Economic Papers, 28, 258–270. Howells, J., & Wood, M. (1993). The globalisation of production and technology. London: Belhaven Press. Johanson, J., & Vahle, J. -E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23–32. Kogut, B., & Chang, S. J. (1996). Platform investments and volatile exchange rates: Direct investment in the U.S. by Japanese electronic companies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78 (2), 221–231. Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. (1994). Options thinking and platform investments: Investing in opportunity. California Management Review, 36 (2), 52–71. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effects of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3), 411–432. Kogut, B. (1983). Foreign direct investment as a sequential process. In C. Kindleberger, & D. Audretsch (Eds.), Multinational corporations in the 1980s (pp. 35–56). Boston, MA: MIT Press. Kogut, B. (1990). The permeability of borders and the speed of learning among countries. In J. Dunning, B. Kogut, & M. Blomstrom (Eds.), Globalization of firms and the competitiveness of nations (pp.59–90). Lund: Lund University Press. Kogut, B. (1991). Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37 (1), 19–33. Kuemmerle, W. (1997). Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. Harvard Business Review, 75 (2), 61–70. Le Bas, C., & Sierra, C. (2002). Location versus home country advantages’ in R&D activities: Some further results on multinationals’ locational strategies. Research Policy, 31, 589–609. McDonald, R., & Siegel, D. (1986). The value of waiting to invest. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101 (4), 707–727. Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, 141–183. OECD. (2002). Trends and recent developments in foreign direct investment. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) report (June). Paris: OECD. ÓhUallacháin, B., & Reid, N. (1997). Acquisition versus greenfield investment: The location and growth of Japanese manufacturers in the United States. Regional Studies, 31 (4), 403–416. Pan, Y., & Tse, D. (2000). The hierarchical model of entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (4), 535–554. Pearce, R., & Singh, S. (1992). Globalizing research and development. London: Macmillan Press. Penner-Hahn, J. (1998). Firm and environmental influences on the mode and sequence of foreign research and development activities. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (2), 149–168. Pennings, E., & Lint, O. (2000). Market entry, phased rollout or abandonment? A real option approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 124, 125–138. Pennings, E.&Sleuwaegen, L. (2000). The choice and timing of foreign market entry under uncertainty (CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2470). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. Shan, W., & Song, J. (1997). Foreign direct investment and the sourcing of technological advantage: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (2), 237–284. Trigeorgis, L. (1998). Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. UNCTAD. (2001). World investment report 2001: Promoting linkages. New York and Geneva: United Nations. Zejan, M. C. (1990). New ventures or acquisition: The choice of Swedish multinational enterprises. Journal of Industrial Economics, 38, 349–355. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/18819 |