Caminada, Koen and Goudswaard, Kees (2004): Are public and private social expenditures complementary? Published in: Department of Economics Research Memorandum No. 2004.01 (2004): pp. 1-19.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_20179.pdf Download (376kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Most analyses of social protection are focussed on public arrangements. However, social effort is not restricted to the public domain; all kinds of private arrangements can be substitutes to public programs. OECD-data indicate that accounting for private social benefits and the impact of the tax system on social expenditure has an equalising effect on levels of social effort across a number of countries. This suggests complementarity between public and private social expenditures. Changes in the public/private mix in social protection will, however, have distributional effects. We expect that private schemes will generate less income redistribution than public programs. In this paper we will perform an empirical analysis. Using comparative international data we analyse whether there is a relationship between public and private social expenditures, and the distribution of income. We find a negative relationship between net public social expenditures and income inequality, but a positive relationship between net private social expenditures and income inequality across countries. In fact, when we incorporate private social security expenditures, the impact of total social expenditure on the income distribution becomes statistically trivial. We conclude that changes in the public/private mix in the provision of social protection may affect the redistributive impact of the welfare state.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Are public and private social expenditures complementary? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Public/Private-Mix, Social Protection, Income Distribution |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H22 - Incidence D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution |
Item ID: | 20179 |
Depositing User: | Koen Caminada |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jan 2010 00:21 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 09:04 |
References: | Adema, W. (2001), 'Net Social Expenditure: 2nd edition', Labour Market and Social Policy - Occasional Papers no. 52, Paris: OECD. Atkinson, A.B. (1970,) 'On the Measurement of Inequality', Journal of Economic Theory 2, p. 244-263. Atkinson, A.B. (2000), 'The Changing Distribution of Income: Evidence and Explanation', German Economic Review 1 (1), p. 3-18. Atkinson, A.B., and A. Brandolini (1999), 'Promise and Pitfalls in the Use of "Secondary" Data-Sets: Income Inequality in OECD Countries', Manuscript. Nuffield College, Oxford and Banca d'Italia, Research Department. Atkinson, A.B., and A. Brandolini (2001), 'Promise and Pitfalls in the Use of Secondary Data-Sets: Income Inequality in OECD Countries as a Case Study', Journal of Economic Literature 39(3) (September), p. 771- 800. Atkinson, A.B., L. Rainwater and T.M. Smeeding (1995), 'Income Distribution in OECD Countries: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study', OECD Social Policy Studies 18, Paris: OECD. Bazen, S., and P. Moyes (2003), 'International Comparisons of Income Distribution', Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 341, Luxembourg. Caminada, K., and K.P. Goudswaard (2001), 'International Trends in Income Inequality and Social Policy', International Tax and Public Finance 8 (4), p. 395-415. Caminada, K., and K.P. Goudswaard (2002), 'Income Distribution and Social Security in an OECD Perspective', in: Roland Sigg and Christina Behrendt (eds.) Social Security in the Global Village, International Social Security Series, Volume 8, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick / Londen, p. 163-188 Cantillon, B., I. Marx, and K. van den Bosch (2002), 'The puzzle of egalitarianism. About the relationships between employment, wage inequality, social expenditures and poverty', CSB-Berichten (Centrum voor Sociaal Beleid UFSIA), Antwerp, Belgium. Casey, B.H. and A. Yamada (2002), 'The Public-Private Mix of Retirement Income in Nine OECD Countries: Some Evidence from Micro-data and an Exploration of its Implications', Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 311, Luxembourg. Champernowne, D.G. (1974), 'A Comparison of Measures of Inequality of Income Distribution', Economic Journal 84, p. 787-816. Cornelisse, P. A., and K.P. Goudswaard (2002), ‘On the convergence of social protection systems in the European Union’, International Social Security Review, Vol. 55, 3, p. 3-17. Deininger, K., and L. Squire (1996), 'A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality', The World Bank Economic Review 10 (3) (September), p. 565-592. Deininger, K., and L. Squire (2002), 'Measuring Income Inequality: A New Database', Economic Growth Research, The World Bank Group. Ervik, R. (1998), 'The Redistributive Aim of Social Policy. A Comparative Analysis of Taxes, Tax Expenditure Transfers and Direct Transfers in Eight Countries', Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 184, Luxembourg. Ferrarini, T., and K. Nelson (2002), 'The Impact of Taxation on the Equalising Effect of Social Insurance to Income Inequality: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Welfare States', Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 327, Luxembourg. Ferrarini, T., and K. Nelson (2003), 'Taxation of Social Insurance and Redistribution: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Welfare States', Journal of European Social Policy 13(1), p. 21-33. Föster, M. (2000), 'Trend and Driving Factors in Income Distribution and Poverty in the OECDF Area', Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers no. 42, OECD, Paris. Gottschalk, P., and T.M. Smeeding (1997), 'Cross-National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality' Journal of Economic Literature 35 (June), p. 633-687. Gottschalk, P., and T.M. Smeeding (1998), 'Empirical Evidence on Income Inequality in Industrialized Countries LIS Working Paper Series 154 (revised), Luxembourg. Gottschalk, P., and T.M. Smeeding (2000), 'Empirical Evidence on Income Inequality in Industrialized Countries', in: A.B. Atkinsin and F. Bourgignon (eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, New York: Elsevier-North Holland Publishers, Vol. 1, p. 262-307. Gottschalk, P., B. Gustafsson, and E. Palmer (eds.) (1997), Changing Patterns in the Distribution of Economic Welfare, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Gouyette, C., and P. Pestieau, (1999), 'Efficiency of the Welfare State', Kyklos 52 (4), 1999, p. 537-553. Gustafsson, B., and M. Johansson (1997), ' In Search for a Smoking Gun: What Makes Income Inequality Vary Over Time in Different Countries?', Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 172, Luxembourg. Kakwani, N.C. (1986), Analyzing Redistribution Policies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Korpi, W. and J. Palme (1998), ‘The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in the Western Countries’, American Sociological Review, 63(5), p. 661- 687. Luxembourg Income Study, 'LIS Key Figures’ and ‘LIS Information Guide - Revised February 1998', Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series no. 7, Luxembourg, 1998. LIS-website http://www.lisproject.org/. Musgrave, R.A., K.E. Case, and H.B. Leonard (1974), 'The Distribution of Fiscal Burdens and Benefits' Public Finance Quarterly (2), July, p. 259-311. OECD (2002), Benefits and Wages. OECD Indicators, Edition 2002, Paris. Ringen, S. (1991), 'Households, standard of living and inequality', Review of Income and Wealth 37, p. 1-13. Smeeding, T. (2000), 'Changing Income Inequality in OECD Countries: Updated Results from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS)', in: R. Hauser en I. Becker (eds.), The Personal Distribution of Income in an International Perspective, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, p. 205-224. Smeeding, T. (2002), 'Globalization, Inequality and the Rich Countries of the G-20: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS)', Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 320, Luxembourg. Smolensky, E., W. Hoyt, and S. Danziger (1987), 'A Critical Survey of Efforts to Measure Budget Incidence', in: H.M. van de Kar, B.L. Wolfe (eds.), The Relevance of Public Finance for Policy-Making, Proceedings IIFP Congress 1985, Detroit:165-179. Swabisch, J., T. Smeeding, and L. Osberg (2003), 'Income Distribution and Social Expenditures: A Cross- National Perspective', Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series 350, Luxembourg. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/20179 |