Tarassow, Artur (2010): The empirical relevance of Goodwin’s business cycle model for the US economy.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_21815.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper attempts to verify Richard Goodwin's (1967) endogenous business cycle theory which states that the driving forces behind fluctuations are class struggles between capitalists and workers about income distribution. Based on a Marxian profit-led model, non-linear differential equations lead to endogenous cycles in the wage-share-employment-space which can be observed empirically. Applying a bivariate vector autoregressive model we analyze the relationship between real unit labor costs and the employment rate for the US economy over a period from 1948:1 to 2006:4. Granger-causality tests, orthogonalized impulse response functions and forecast error variance decomposition are conducted for the raw data as well as the cyclical components of the Hodrick-Prescott and Baxter-King filter methods. We verify the profit-led character of the US goods market and find that income distribution is driven by labor market dynamics.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The empirical relevance of Goodwin’s business cycle model for the US economy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Business cycle, Goodwin, Econometrics, Marxian Economics, Post Keynesian Economics, Functional income distribution |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E11 - Marxian ; Sraffian ; Kaleckian |
Item ID: | 21815 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Artur Tarassow |
Date Deposited: | 07 Apr 2010 05:35 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 07:43 |
References: | Barbosa-Filho, N.H. & Taylor, L., 2006. Distributive and Demand Cycles in the US Economy - A Structuralist Goodwin Model. Metroeconomica, 57(3), 389-411. Baxter, M. & King, R.G., 1995. Measuring Business Cycles Approximate Band-Pass Filters for Economic Time Series, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Available at: http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/5022.html [Accessed October 13, 2009]. Beaudry, P. & Lucke, B., 2009. Letting Different Views about Business Cycles Compete, Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w14950.pdf [Accessed April 10, 2009]. Beaudry, P. & Portier, F., 2006. Stock Prices, News, and Economic Fluctuations. American Economic Review, 96(4), 1293-1307. Desai, M., 1984. An econometric model of the share of wages in national income: UK 1855-1965. In R. M. Goodwin, M. Krüger, & A. Vercelli, eds. Nonlinear Models of fluctuating growth. Lecture notes in economic and mathematical systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Deutsche Bundesbank, 2009. Unternehmensgewinne und Aktienkurse, Deutsche Bundesbank. Available at: http://www.bundesbank.de/download/volkswirtschaft/mba/2009/200907mba_gewinne.pdf [Accessed April 22, 2009]. Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T.J. & Stock, J.H., 1996. Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica, Vol. 64(4), 813-836. Flaschel, P., Kauermann, G. & Teuber, T., 2005. Long Cycles in Employment, Inflation and Real Unit Wage Costs Qualitative Analysis and Quantitative Assessment. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 69-77. Goldstein, J.P., 1999. Predator-Prey Model Estimates of the Cyclical Profit Squeeze. Metroeconomica, 50(2), 139-173. Goodwin, R.M., 1967. A Growth Cycle. In C. H. Feinstein, ed. Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth. Essays presented to Maurice Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 54-58. Harvie, D., 2000. Testing Goodwin: growth cycles in ten OECD countries. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24, 349-376. Hodrick, R. J. & Prescott, E. C., 1997. Postwar U.S. Business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 29, 1-16. Lotka, A.J., 1956. Elements of Mathematical Biology, New York. Lotka, A.J., 1925. Elements of Physical Biology, New York. Lütkepohl, H., 2005. New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis, Berlin. Mattfeldt, H., 1999. Auf der Suche nach dem "Krug der Witwe" - Lohnquote und Sparverhalten. In F. Helmedag & N. Reuter, eds. Der Wohlstand der Personen. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Karl Georg Zinn. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag, pp. 287-307. Mohun, S. & Veneziani, R., 2006. Goodwin Cycles and the U.S. Economy, 1948-2004, Solow, R.M., 1990. Goodwin's Growth Cycle: Reminiscence and Rumination. In K. Velupillai, ed. Nonlinear and Multisectoral Macrodynamics: Essays in Honour of Richard Goodwin. New York: University Press, pp. 31-41. Stockhammer, E. & Stehrer, R., 2009. Goodwin or Kalecki in Demand? Functional Income Distribution and Aggegaret Demand in the Short Run, Available at: http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/working_papers/working_papers_201-250/WP203.pdf [Accessed August 31, 2009]. Volterra, V., 1959. Theory of Functionals and of Integro-Differential Equations, New York. Volterra, V., 1927. Variazioni e fluctuationi del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi. In Memorie del R. Comitato talassografico italiano. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/21815 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
The empirical relevance of Goodwin’s business cycle model for the US economy. (deposited 04 Mar 2010 03:27)
- The empirical relevance of Goodwin’s business cycle model for the US economy. (deposited 07 Apr 2010 05:35) [Currently Displayed]