Kalirajan, Kaliappa and Miankhel, Adil and Thangavelu, Shandre (2009): Foreign direct investment, exports, and economic growth in selected emerging countries: Multivariate VAR analysis.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_22763.pdf Download (248kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper adopts a time series framework of the Vector Error Correction Models (VECM) to study the dynamic relationship between export, FDI and GDP for six emerging countries of Chile, India, Mexico, Malaysia, Pakistan and Thailand. Stationarity of the series with structural breaks is also examined in the model. Given that these countries are at different stages of growth, we will be able to identify the impact of FDI and export on economic growth at different stages of growth. The results suggest that in South Asia, there is evidence of an export led growth hypothesis. However, in the long run, we identify GDP growth as the common factor that drives growth in other variables such as exports in the case of Pakistan and FDI in the case of India. The Latin American countries of Mexico and Chile show a different relationship in the short run but in the long run, exports affect the growth of FDI and output. In the case of East Asian countries, we find bi-directional long run relationship among exports, FDI and GDP in Malaysia, while we find a long run uni-directional relationship from GDP to export in case of Thailand.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Foreign direct investment, exports, and economic growth in selected emerging countries: Multivariate VAR analysis |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | FDI, Exports, Multivariate VAR, Pakistan, India, Malaysia, Thailand, Chile, Mexico. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology |
Item ID: | 22763 |
Depositing User: | Kaliappa Kalirajan |
Date Deposited: | 18 May 2010 14:17 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 18:47 |
References: | Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X., 1995. Economic Growth, McGraw-Hill, Cambridge, MA. Borensztein, E. and De Gregoro, J and Lee.J.W., 1998. ‘How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth’, Journal of International Economics, 45(1998):115-135. Chenery , H. Strout and A., 1966. H. ‘ Foreign assistance and economic development’, American Economic Review, 56(4): 679–733. Chowdhury, A and Mavrotas, G., 2003. FDI and growth, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, and UNU-WIDER, Helsinki. Clemente, J and Montanes, A and Reyes, M., 1998. ‘Testing for a unit in variables with a double change in the mean’, Economic letters, 59(1998):175-182. Duttaray, M and Dutt, A. K and Mukhopadhyay, K., 2008. ‘Foreign direct investment and economic growth in less developed countries: an empirical study of causality and mechanisms’, Applied Economics, 40(2008):1927-1939. Easterly,W., King, R., Levine R., Rebelo, S., 1994. Policy, Technology Adoption and Growth. Working Paper No. 4681. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Findlay, R., 1978. ‘Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment, and the transfer of technology: a simple dynamic model’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92: 1–16. Frankel, J.A and Romer, D., 1999. ‘Does trade cause growth’, The American Economic Review, June (1999):379-399. Gao, T., 2004. ‘Foreign direct investment from developing Asia: some distinctive features’, Economic Letters, 86(2005):29-35. Grossman, G and Helpman, E., 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MI Press. Cambridge, MA. Hsiao, F.S.T and Hsiao, M. C.W., 2006. ‘FDI, exports, and GDP in east and southeast Asia-Panel data versus time series causality analyses’, Journal of Asian Economics, 17(2006):1082-1106. Jung, W.S and Marshall, P.J., 1985. ‘Exports, growth and causality in developing countries’, Journal of Development Economics, 18(1985):1-12. Kim, J.D and Kang, I.S., 1996. ‘Outward FDI and exports: the case of South Korea and Japan’, Journal of Asian Economics, 8(1):39-50. Liu, X and Wang, C., Wei, Wei, Y., 2001. ‘Causal links between foreign direct investments and trade in China’, China Economic Review, 12(2001):190-202. Makki, S.S and Somwaru, A., 2004. ‘Impact of foreign direct investment and trade on economic growth: Evidence from developing countries’ American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 86(3)(August 2004):795-801. McKinnon, R.I., 1964. ‘Foreign exchange constraints in economic development and efficient aid allocation’, The Economic Journal, 74(294): 288-409. Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, vol. 57, pp. 1361-1401. Shahbaz, M and Ahmed, N and Ali, L., 2008. ‘Stock market development and economic Growth: ARDL causality in Pakistan, International Research journal of Finance and Economics, 14(2008):182-1195. Thangavelu, S.M and Rajaguru, G., 2004. ‘Is there an export or import-led productivity growth in rapidly developing Asian countries? A multivariate VAR analysis’, Applied Economics, 36(2004):1083-1093. Waheed, M and Alam, T., Ghauri, S.P., 2006. ‘Structural breaks and unit root: evidence from Pakistan macroeconomic time series’, Munich Personal RePEC Archive No 1797, 20 October 2009. Yanruni, W., 1999. ‘Foreign direct investment and economic growth in China’, Journal of Asian Economics, 11(2000):471-475. Yasar, M and Paul, C.J.M., 2006. ‘International linkages and productivity at the plant level: Foreign direct investment, exports, imports and licensing’, Journal of International Economics, 71(2007):373-388. Zhang, Q and Felmingham, B., 2001. ‘The relationship between inward direct foreign investment and China’s provincial export trade’, China Economic Review,12(2001):82-99. Zivot, E. and Andrews, D.W.K. (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 10, pp. 251-270. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/22763 |