Polder, Michael and Van Leeuwen, George and Mohnen, Pierre and Raymond, Wladimir (2010): Product, process and organizational innovation: drivers, complementarity, and productivity effects.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_23719.pdf Download (305kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We propose a model where both R&D and ICT investment feed into a system of three innovation output equations (product, process and organizational innovation), which ultimately feeds into a productivity equation. We find that ICT investment and usage are important drivers of innovation in both manufacturing and services. Doing more R&D has a positive effect on product innovation in manufacturing. The strongest productivity effects are derived from organizational innovation. We find positive effects of product and process innovation when combined with an organizational innovation. There is evidence that organizational innovation is complementary to process innovation.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Product, process and organizational innovation: drivers, complementarity, and productivity effects |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Innovation; ICT; R&D; productivity |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives |
Item ID: | 23719 |
Depositing User: | Michael, J.M. Polder |
Date Deposited: | 08 Jul 2010 19:38 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 12:05 |
References: | Amemiya, Takeshi. 1984. “Tobit models: a survey.” Journal of Econometrics, 24: 3-62. Ark, Bart van, Mary O’Mahony, and Marcel P. Timmer. 2008. “The Productivity Gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and Causes.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1): 25-44. Black, Sandra E., and Lisa M. Lynch. 2001. “How to compete: the impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3): 434-445. Bloom, Nicholas, Luis Garicano, Raffaella Sadun and John Van Reenen. 2009. “The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization.” NBER Working Paper No. w14975. Bresnahan, Timothy F., Erik Brynjolfsson and Lorin M. Hitt. 2002. “Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1): 339-376. Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Lorin M. Hitt. 2000. “Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4): 23-48. Brynjolfsson, Erik, Andrew McAfee, Michael Sorell, and Feng Zhu. 2006. “Scale without mass: business process replication and industry dynamics.” Harvard Business School working paper 07-016. Chudnovsky, Daniel, Andrés López, and Germán Pupato. 2006. “Innovation and productivity in developing countries: a study of Argentine manufacturing firms’ behavior (1992-2001).” Research Policy, 35: 266-288. Crépon, Bruno, Emmanuel Duguet, and Jacques Mairesse. 1998. “Research, innovation and productivity : an econometric analysis at the firm level.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7: 115-158. Crespi, Gustavo, Chiara Criscuolo, and Jonathan Haskel. 2007. “Information technology, organizational change and productivity growth: evidence from UK firms.” CEP Discussion Paper no. 783. Eurostat. 2008. “Information Society: ICT impact assessment by linking data from different sources (Final Report).” Luxembourg: Eurostat. 27 Greenhalgh, Christine and Mark Rogers. 2010. Innovation, intellectual property, and economic growth. Woodstock, Oxfordshire (UK): Princeton University Press. Griffith, Rachel, Elena Huergo, Jacques Mairesse, and Bettina Peters. 2006. “Innovation and productivity across four European countries.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(4): 483-498. Griliches, Zvi. 1979. “Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth.” Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1): 92-116. Jorgenson, Dale W., Mun S. Ho, and Kevin J. Stiroh. 2008, “A Retrospective Look at the U.S. Productivity Growth Resurgence.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1): 3-24. Kodde, David, and Franz Palm. 1986. “Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions.” Econometrica, 54(5): 1243-1248. Kox, Henk, George van Leeuwen, and Henry van der Wiel. 2007. “Market structure, productivity and scale in European business services.” CBS Discussion Paper 7013. Leeuwen, George van, and Shikeb Farooqui. 2008. “ICT, innovation and productivity.” In Eurostat “Information society: ICT impact assessment by linking data from different sources.” 222-239. Leeuwen, George van, and Luuk Klomp. 2006. “On the contribution of innovation to multifactor productivity growth.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15: 367-390. Lööf, Hans, and Almas Heshmati. 2002. “Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity.” International Journal of Production Economics, 76(1): 61-85. Mairesse, Jacques, Pierre Mohnen and Elisabeth Kremp. 2006. “The importance of R&D and innovation for productivity: a reexamination in light of the French innovation survey.” Annales d’Économie et de Statisque, 79/80: 1-24. Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. 1990. “The economics of modern manufacturing, technology, strategy and organizations.” American Economic Review, 80: 511-528. Mohnen, Pierre and Lars-Hendrik Röller. 2005. “Complementarities in innovation policy.” European Economic Review, 49: 1431-1450. Murphy, Marian. 2002. “Organizational change and firm performance.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2002/14, OECD Publishing. Olley, G. Steven, and Ariel Pakes. 1996. “The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry.” Econometrica, 64(6): 1263-1297. 28 Parisi, Maria Laura, Fabio Schiantarelli, and Alessandro Sembenelli. 2006. “Productivity, innovation and R&D: micro-evidence for Italy.” European Economic Review, 50(8): 2037-2061. Polder, Michael, George van Leeuwen, Pierre Mohnen and Wladimir Raymond. 2009. “Productivity effects of innovation modes.” Statistics Netherlands Discussion Paper 09033. Raymond, Wladimir, Pierre Mohnen, Franz Palm, and Sybrand Schim van der Loeff. 2010. “Persistence of innovation in Dutch manufacturing: Is it spurious?” Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming. Robin, Stephane, and Jacques Mairesse. 2008. “Innovation and productivity: a firm-level analysis for French manufacturing and services using CIS3 and CIS4 data (1998-2000 and 2002- 2004).” Paper presented at the DRUID conference, Copenhagen, June 2008. Roper, Stephen, Jun Du, and James H. Love. 2008. “Modeling the innovation value chain.” Research Policy, 37: 961-977. Schmidt, Tobias and Christian Rammer. 2007. “Non-technological and technological innovation: strange bedfellows?” ZEW discussion paper no. 07-052. Train, Kenneth. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulations. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. Yasar, Mahmut, Rafal Raciborski, and Brian Poi. 2008. “Production function estimation in Stata using the Olley and Pakes method.” Stata Journal, 8(2): 221-231. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/23719 |