Innovation and competition in EU15: Empirical evidence on the Lisbon Decade and beyond

Ugur, Mehmet and Guner, Umit (2010): Innovation and competition in EU15: Empirical evidence on the Lisbon Decade and beyond.

Abstract

In March 2000, the Lisbon Summit set the European Union the goal of becoming ‘the most dynamic and competitive knowledge-based economy in the world’ by 2010. This paper aims to ascertain the extent to which various indicators of innovation in EU15 have improved and whether such improvement has been driven by higher levels of competition in EU15 economies. To this end, we provide a descriptive account of the competition and innovation indicators from 1980-2008. Then, we discuss the relationship between market structure (level of competition) and innovation; and estimate the impact of the former on the latter. We report that aggregate innovation measures for EU15 have been increasing over the 1980-2008 period and there does not seem to be a significant change in the trend during the Lisbon decade (200-2008). Furthermore, increasing levels of innovation have been associated with increasing economic rents – i.e., with further departures from the perfect-competition baseline. Fixed-effect panel-data regression results point out a positive and statistically significant relationship between economic rents and various measures of innovations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Innovation, competition, European Union, Lisbon Agenda
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection

References

Acemoglu, D. et al (2002), ‘Distance to frontier, selection and economic growth’, NBER Working Papers, no. 9066.

Aghion, P. and C. Howitt (1992), ‘A model of growth through destruction’, Econometrica, vol. 60, pp. 323-351.

Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith and P. Howitt (2005), ‘Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 701-728.

Baumol, W. J. (1965). ‘Informal judgement, rigorous theory and public policy’. Southern Economic Journal. 32(1), 137-146.

Bhagwati, J. N., V. K. Ramaswami and T. N. Srinivasan (1969). ‘Domestic distortions, tariffs and the theory of optimum subsidiy: some further results’. Journal of Political Economy, 77(4), 1005-1019.

Blackorby, C. (1990). ‘Economic policy in a second-best environment’. Canadian Journal of Economics, 23(4), 748-771.

Dierx, A., I. Fabienne and K. Sekkat (2002), ‘European integration and the functioning of product markets’, European Economy, Special Report No. 2, pp. 1-21.

Dixit, Ayinash K. Joseph E. Stiglitz (1977), ‘Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity’, American Economic Review, Vol. 67 Issue 3, p297-308.

EU Commission (2005), Common Actions for Growth and Employment: The Community Lisbon Programme, COM(2005) 330 final, 20.7.2005, Brussels.

EU Commission (2006), ‘Commission staff working document accompanying the European Competitiveness Report of 2006’, SEC(2006) / 1467/2, 14.11.2006, Brussels.

Gelauff, George M.M. and Arjan M. Lejour (2006), ‘The New Lisbon strategy: an estimation of the economic impact of reaching five Lisbon targets’, Industrial Policy and Economic Reforms Papers No. 1, EU Commission, Enterprise and Industry D-G, (January), Brussels.

Glibert, R. (2006), ‘Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where are we in the competition-innovation debate?’ in Jaffe, A. B., J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 6, Massachusetts, MIT Press, pp. 159-215

Green, W. H. (2008), Econometric Analysis (6th ed.), Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall.

Griffith, R., R. Harrison and H. Simpson (2006a) ,‘The link between product market reform, innovation and EU macroeconomic performance’, European Economy, no. 243, February 2006, pp. 1 – 123.

Griffith, R., R. Harrison and H. Simpson (2006b), ‘Product market reforms and innovation in the EU’, Institute of Fiscal Studies Working Papers, No. WP06/17.

Grosman, G. and E. Helpman (1991), ‘Quality ladders in the theory of growth’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 43-61.

Kok, W. (2004), Facing the Challenge: The Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Employment, http://ec.europa.eu/growthandjobs/pdf/kok_report_en.pdf

Labour Cost Metadata, Definition of Labour Cost, AMECO Database, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/ameco/HelpHtml/uwcd.html Lipsey, R. G. (2007). ‘Reflections on the general theory of second best at its golden jubilee’. Retrieved on 18 April, 2007, from http://www.sfu.ca/~rlipsey.

Lipsey, R. G. and K. Lancaster (1956). ‘The general theory of second best’. The Review of Economic Studies, 24(1), 11-32.

OECD (2010), Measuring Innovation: A New Perspective, On-Line Version, http://www.oecd.org/document/22/0,3343,en_41462537_41454856_44979734_1_1_1_1,00.html

Rakowski, J. (1980). ‘The theory of second best and the competitive equilibrium model’. Journal of Economic Issues, 14(1), 197-207.

Rogers, M. (1998), ‘The definition and measurement of innovation’, Melbourne Institutite Working Papers, no. 10/98, http://melbourneinstitute.com/wp/wp1998n10.pdf

Sapir, A. Et al (2004), An Agenda for a Growing Europe: The Sapir Report, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1912), The Theory of Economic Development – An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Unwin, London.

Value-Added Metadata, Definition of Value-Added, AMECO Database, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/ameco/HelpHtml/uvge.html Veugelers. R. et al (2002), ‘Determinants of industrial concentration, market integration and efficiency in the European Union’, European Economy, Special Report no. 2, European Commission, DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, 2002, pp. 103-221.