Decarbonization of the U.S. electricity sector: Are state energy policy portfolios the solution?

Sanya, Carley (2010): Decarbonization of the U.S. electricity sector: Are state energy policy portfolios the solution?

Abstract

State governments have taken the lead on U.S. energy and climate policy. It is not yet clear, however, whether state energy policy portfolios can generate results in a similar magnitude or manner to their presumed carbon mitigation potential. This article seeks to address this lack of policy evidence and contribute empirical insights on the carbon mitigation effects of state energy portfolios within the U.S. electricity sector. Using a dynamic, long-term electricity dispatch model with U.S. power plant, utility, and transmission and distribution data between 2010 and 2030, this analysis builds a series of state-level policy portfolio scenarios and performs a comparative scenario analysis. Results reveal that state policy portfolios have modest to minimal carbon mitigation effects in the long run if surrounding states do not adopt similar portfolios as well. The difference in decarbonization potential between isolated state policies and larger, more coordinated policy efforts is due in large part to carbon leakage, which is the export of carbon intensive fossil fuel-based electricity across state lines. Results also confirm that a carbon price of $50/metric ton CO2e can generate substantial carbon savings. Although both policy options—an energy policy portfolio or a carbon price—are effective at reducing carbon emissions in the present analysis, neither is as effective alone as when the two strategies are combined.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Electricity markets, Energy policy, Carbon dioxide, Climate policy
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L94 - Electric Utilities

References

Arizona Climate Change Advisory Group, August 2006. Climate Change Action Plan.

Brown, Marilyn A., Levine, Mark D., Short, Walter, Koomey, Jonathan G., 2001. Scenarios for a clean energy future. Energy Policy 29(14), 1179–1196.

Bushnell, James, Peterman, Carla, Wolfram, Catherine, October 2007. Local solutions to global problems: Policy choice and regulatory jurisdiction. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 13472.

Carley, Sanya, 2009. State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness. Energy Policy 37(8), 3071-3081.

Center for Climate Strategies, 2009. Available online: http://www.climatestrategies.us/.cfm. Last accessed 11/16/2009.

Chen, Cliff, Wiser, Ryan, and Bolinger, Mark, March 2007. Weighing the costs and benefits of renewables portfolio standards: A comparative analysis of state-level policy impact projections. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

EPRI Energy Technology Assessment Center, 2007. The Power to Reduce CO2 Emissions: The Full Portfolio. Discussion Paper prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute 2007 Summer Seminar.

European Union, 2009. “Emissions trading: Member States approve list of sectors deemed to be exposed to carbon leakage.” Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/emission/carbon_en.htm. Last accessed: 10/20/2009.

Fisher, Carolyn, Newell, Richard, 2008. Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55(2), 142-162.

Gillingham, Kenneth, Newell, Richard G., Palmer, Karen, 2004. Retrospective Examination of Demand-Side Energy Efficiency Policies. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper.

Gonzalez, Pablo del Rio, 2007. The interaction between emissions trading and renewable electricity support schemes: An overview of the literature. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategy for Global Climate Change 12, 1363-1390.

Gumerman, Etan, Daniels, Brigham, August 2009. An Evaluation of Utah’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Options. An analysis performed by the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions for the State of Utah.

Gumerman, Etan, Koomey, Jonathan G., Brown, Marilyn A., 2001. Strategies for cost-effective carbon reductions: a sensitivity analysis of alternative scenarios. Energy Policy 29(14), 1313-1323.

Gunningham, Neil, Gabrosky, Peter, 1998. Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Clarendon Press: Oxford.

Hadley, S.W., Short, W., 2001. Electricity sector analysis in the clean energy futures study. Energy Policy 29 (14), 1285-1298.

IPCC, 2005. In: Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H.C., Loos, M., Meyer, L.A. (Eds.), IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kydes, Andy S., 2007. Impacts of a renewable portfolio generation standard on US energy markets. Energy Policy 34.

Montana Climate Change Advisory Committee, 2007. Montana Climate Action Plan. Available online: http://www.mtclimatechange.us/CCAC.cfm.

New Mexico Climate Change Advisory Group, 2006. New Mexico Climate Change Action Plan. Available online: http://www.nmclimatechange.us/.

North Carolina Climate Action Plan Advisory Group, 2008. North Carolina Climate Action Plan Advisory Group: Recommended Mitigation Options for Controlling Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Available online: http://www.ncclimatechange.us/.

North Carolina Solar Center, 2009. Database for State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency. Available online: www.dsireusa.org. Last accessed 11/20/2009.

North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 2009. Electric Supply & Demand Database. Available online: http://www.nerc.com/~esd/. Last accessed 11/20/2009.

Pacala, S., and Socolow, R., 2004. Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies. Science 305.

Palmer, Karen, Burtraw, Dallas, 2005. Cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity policies. Energy Economics 27, 873-894.

Rabe, Barry G., 2008. Regionalism and Global Climate Change Policy, in: Conlan, Timothy, Posner, Paul (Eds.), Intergovernmental Management for the 21st Century, Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C.

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, 2007. Potential Emissions Leakage and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI): Evaluating Market Dynamics, Monitoring Options, and Possible Mitigation Mechanisms.

Rubin, Edward S., Chen, Chao, Rao, Anand B., 2007. Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage. Energy Policy 35, 4444–4454.

Sorrell, Steven, Sijm Jos, 2003. Carbon trading in the policy mix. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19(3), 420-437.

U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, 2009. Annual Energy Outlook, 2009. Available online: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/index.html. Last accessed 10/2/09.

U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, 2009. Annual Electric Generator Report, Form EIA-860. Available online: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/eia860.html. Last accessed 10/2/09.

U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, May 2008. 20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy’s Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009. Clean Air Markets. Available online: http://camddataandmaps.epa.gov/gdm/. Last accessed 10/2/09.

Utah Governor’s Blue Ribbon Advisory Council on Climate Change, October 3, 2007. Report to Governor Jon M. Huntsman, Jr. Available online: http://www.deq.utah.gov/BRAC_Climate/final_report.htm.

Wiser, Ryan, Barbose, Galen, 2008. Renewables Portfolio Standards in the United States: A Status Report with Data through 2007. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory report LBLN-154E.