Morales Meoqui, Jorge (2010): Comparative advantage and the labor theory of value. Published in: History of Political Economy , Vol. 43, No. 4 (December 2011): pp. 743-763.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_32328.pdf Download (298kB) | Preview |
Abstract
With the famous numerical example of chapter 7 of the Principles David Ricardo intended to illustrate first and foremost the new proposition that his labor theory of value does not regulate the price of international transactions when the factors of production are immobile between countries. Unfortunately, later scholars have often omitted this proposition when referring to Ricardo’s numerical example. Instead, they have highlighted only the comparative-advantage proposition, although Ricardo considered it as a corollary of the omitted proposition, and therefore inextricably linked to it. This inexplicable omission has led to an incomplete understanding of the logical construction of Ricardo’s numerical example, as well as the misinterpretation of the four numbers as unitary labor costs. With the accurate understanding of Ricardo’s numerical example and the logical relationship between the two propositions it meant to prove, it is relatively easy to refute the main objections that have been raised against the very same numerical example in the past. Moreover, it reaffirms the sustained relevance of Ricardo’s two propositions as important insights for understanding the current process of economic globalization.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Comparative advantage and the labor theory of value |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | comparative advantage, labor theory of value, David Ricardo, free trade |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B12 - Classical (includes Adam Smith) F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General |
Item ID: | 32328 |
Depositing User: | Jorge Morales Meoqui |
Date Deposited: | 17 Jan 2012 19:52 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 00:09 |
References: | Aldrich, J. (2004). The Discovery of Comparative Advantage. Journal of the History of Economic Thought , 26, 379-399. Cairnes, J. E. (1967). Some Leading Principles of Political Economy (Reprint. London 1874 ed.). New York: Kelley. Chipman, J. S. (1965). A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part 1, The Classical Theory. Econometrica , 33 (3), 477-519. Graham, F. D. (1923). Some Aspects of Protection Further Considered. The Quaterly Journal of Economics , 37 (2), 199-227. Krugman, P. R. (n.d.). Ricardo's Difficult Idea. Retrieved April 11, 2007, from http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/ricardo.htm Malthus, T. R. (1989). Principles of Political Economy (Vol. I). (J. Pullen, Ed.) Cambridge et al. : Cambridge University Press. Maneschi, A. (1998). Comparative Advantage in International Trade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Maneschi, A. (2004). The True Meaning of Ricardo's Magic Four Numbers. Journal of International Economics , 62 (2), 433-443. Mill, J. (1826). Elements of Political Economy (3rd Edition ed.). London: Baldwin, Cradock and Joy . Mill, J. S. (1909). Principles of Political Economy. Retrieved September 12, 2006, from Library of Economics and Liberty: htp://www.econlib.org/library/Mill/mlP1.html Ricardo, D. (2004). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo (Vols. I-XI). (P. Sraffa, Ed.) Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc. Robbins, L. (1958). Robert Torrens and the Evolution of Classical Economics. London: Macmillan. Ruffin, R. J. (2002). David Ricardo's Discovery of the Comparative Advantage. History of Political Economy, 34 (4), 727-748. Samuelson, P. A. (1969). The Way of an Economist. In P. A. Samuelson (Ed.), International Economic Relations: Proceedings of the Third Congress of the International Economic Association (pp. 1-11). London: Macmillan. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith ed.). (R. H. Campbell, & A. S. Skinner, Eds.) Indianapolis: LibertyClassics. Sraffa, P. (1930). An Alleged Correction of Ricardo. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 44, 539-544. Thweatt, W. O. (1976). James Mill and the Early Development of Comparative Advantage. History of Political Economy , 8 (2), 207-234. Torrens, R. (2000). Collected Works of Robert Torrens (Vols. I-VIII). (G. d. Vivo, Ed.) Bristol: Thoemmes Press. Viner, J. (1937). Studies in the Theory of International Trade. London: Allen & Unwin. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/32328 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Comparative advantage and the labor theory of value. (deposited 30 Nov 2010 10:33)
- Comparative advantage and the labor theory of value. (deposited 17 Jan 2012 19:52) [Currently Displayed]