Customer Market Power and the Provision of Trade Credit; Evidence from Eastern Europe and Central Asia

Van Horen, Neeltje (2007): Customer Market Power and the Provision of Trade Credit; Evidence from Eastern Europe and Central Asia.

Abstract

Statistics show that the sale of goods on credit is widespread among firms even when they are capital constrained and thus face relatively high costs in providing trade credit. This study provides an explanation for this by arguing that customers that possess strong market power are able to increase their customer surplus by demanding to purchase the goods on credit. This gain in customer surplus increases with the degree of asymmetric information between buyer and seller with respect to product quality. Therefore, firms that are perceived as risky are especially subject to the market power of the customer and have to sell their goods on credit. Using detailed firm-level data from a large number of firms in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, this paper finds evidence consistent with this hypothesis. We find a strong positive correlation between customer market power and trade credit provision. Furthermore, this relationship is especially strong when the supplier is more risky and in countries with limited financial sector development or weak legal system.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: The World Bank, University of Amsterdam
• Language: English
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L14 - Transactional Relationships ; Contracts and Reputation ; Networks; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L10 - General

References

References Atanasova, C. and N. Wilson (2003), “Borrowing Constraints and the Demand for Trade Credit: Evidence from UK Panel Data,” Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 24, pp. 503-514. Beck, T., A. Demirgüç-Kunt, and V. Maksimovic (2005), “Financial and Legal Constraints to Firm Growth: Does Firm Size Matter?” Journal of Finance, vol. 60, pp. 137-177. Banjeree, S., S. Dasgupta, and Y. Kim (2004), “Buyer-Supplier Relationships and Trade Credit,” mimeo, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and Hanyang University. Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and V. Maksimovic (1998), “Law, Finance and Firm Growth,” Journal of Finance, vol. 53, pp. 2107-2137. Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and V. Maksimovic (2002), “Firms as Financial Intermediaries: Evidence from Trade Credit Data,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2696. Ferris, J. (1981), “The Transactions Theory of Trade Credit Use,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 96, pp. 243-270. Fisman, R. and M. Raturi (2004), “Does Competition Encourage Credit Provision? Evidence from African Trade Credit Relationships,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 86, pp. 345-352. Knack, S. and P. Keefer (1995), “Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests using Alternative Institutional Measures,” Economics and Politics, vol. 7, pp. 207-227. Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi, 2005, “Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996-2004,” Washington, DC, The World Bank. Long M., I. Malitz, and S. Ravid (1993), “Trade Credit, Quality Guarantees, and Product Marketability,” Financial Management, vol. 22, pp. 117-127. McMillan, J. and C. Woodruff (1999), “Interfirm Relationships and Informal Credit in Vietnam,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 114, pp. 1285-1320. Mian, S. and C. Smith (1992), “Accounts Receivable Management Policy: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Finance, vol. 47, pp. 169-200. Ng, C., J. Smith, and R. Smith (1999), “Evidence on the Determinants of Credit Terms used in Interfirm Trade,” Journal of Finance, vol. 54, pp. 1109-1129. Petersen, M. and R. Rajan (1994), “The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data,” Journal of Finance, vol. 49, pp. 3-37. Petersen, M. and R. Rajan (1995), “The Effect of Credit Market Competition on Lending Relationships,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, pp. 407-443. Petersen, M. and R. Rajan (1997), “Trade Credit: Theories and Evidence,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 10, pp. 661-691. Pike, R., N. S. Cheng, K. Cravens, and D. Lamminmaki (2005), “Trade Credit Terms: Asymmetric Information and Price Discrimination Evidence from Three Continents,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 32, pp. 1197- 1236. Rajan, R. and L. Zingales (1998), “Financial Dependence and Growth,” American Economic Review, vol. 88, pp. 559-586. 20 Smith, J. (1987), “Trade Credit and Informational Asymmetry,” Journal of Finance, vol. 42, pp. 863-872. Smith, J. (1995), “Inter Enterprise Debt and Monetary Policy in the UK,” mimeo, Bank of England. Wilson, N. and B. Summers (2002), “Trade Credit Terms Offered by Small Firms: Survey Evidence and Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 29, pp. 317-351.