Monopoly pricing of social goods

Sääskilahti, Pekka (2007): Monopoly pricing of social goods.

Abstract

We analyse the roles of social network topology and size on the monopoly pricing of network goods in a market, where consumers interact with each other and are characterised by their social relations. The size effect is the well-known network externalities phenomenon, while the topological effect has not been previously studied in this context. The topological effect works against, and dominates, the size effect in monopoly pricing by reducing the monopoly's capacity to extract consumer surplus. Under asymmetric information about consumer types, the monopoly prefers symmetric network topologies, but the social optimum is an asymmetric network.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: social relations; networks; coordination; monopoly
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L14 - Transactional Relationships ; Contracts and Reputation ; Networks; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D42 - Monopoly; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design

References

Arthur WB, 1989. Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events. Economic Journal, 99(394), 116-131. Banerji A, Dutta B, 2005. Local Network Externalities and Market Segmentation. Warwick Economic Research Papers 725. Bensaid B, Lesne J-P, 1996. Dynamic Monopoly Pricing with Network Externalities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(6), 837-855. Cabral LMB, Salant DJ, Woroch GA, 1999. Monopoly Pricing with Network Externalities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17(2), 199-214. Carlsson H, van Damme E, 1993. Global Games and Equilibrium Selection. Econometrica, 61(5), 989-1018. David PA, 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75(2), 332-337. De Palma A, Leruth L, 1996. Variable Willingness to Pay for Network Externalities with Strategic Standardization Decisions. European Journal of Political Economy, 12(2), 235-251. Ellison G, 1993. Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination. Econometrica, 61(5), 1047-1071. Farrell J, Saloner G, 1985. Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 16(1), 70-83. Fudenberg D, Tirole J, 1991. Game Theory. MIT Press: Cambridge Massachusetts. Goyal S, Konovalov A, Moraga-González JL, 2003. Hybrid R&D. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI2003-041/1. Herrendorf B, Valentinyi Á, Waldman R, 2000. Ruling Out Multiplicity and Indeterminancy: The Role of Heterogeneity. Review of Economic Studies, 67(2), 295-307. Jackson MO, 2005. A Survey of Models of Network Formation: Stability and Efficiency. In: Demange G, Wooders M (Eds), Group Formation in Economics: Networks, Clubs and Coalitions, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge United Kingdom. Katz ML, Shapiro C, 1985. Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-440. Kessing SG, Nuscheler R, 2006. Monopoly Pricing with Negative Network Effects: The Case of Vaccines. European Economic Review, 50(4), 1061-1069. Kranton RE, Minehart DF, 2001. A Theory of Buyer-Seller Networks. American Economic Review, 91(3), 485-508. Lee IH, Valentinyi A, 2000. Noisy Contagion without Mutation. Review of Economic Studies, 67(1), 47-56. Mason R, 2000. Network Externalities and the Coase Conjecture. European Economic Review, 44(10), 1981-1992. Mason R, Valentinyi Á, 2003. Independence and Heterogeneity in Games of Incomplete Information. University of Southampton Discussion Papers in Economics and Econometrics 0307. Mason R, Valletti TM, 2001. Competition in Communication Networks: Pricing and Regulation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17(3), 389-415. Morris S, 2000. Contagion. Review of Economic Studies, 67(1), 57-78. Morris S, Shin HS, 2003. Global Games: Theory and Applications. In: Dewatripont M, Hansen LP, Turnovsky SJ (Eds), Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Theory and Applications, Eight World Congress, 1, 56-114, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge United Kingdom. Sundararajan A, 2005. Local Network Effects and Network Structure. Center for Digital Economy Research Working Paper CeDER-05-02. Swann GMP, 2002. The Functional Form of Network E¤ects. Information Economics and Policy, 14(3), 417-429. Sääskilahti P, 2005a. Buying Decision Coordination and Monopoly Pricing of Network Goods. HECER Discussion Papers, 64. Sääskilahti P, 2005b. Essays on the Economics of Networks and Social Relations, A-263. Helsinki School of Economics: Helsinki Finland. Tucker C, 2006. Interactive, Option-Value and Domino Network Effects in Technology Adoption. Mimeo. Vives X, 2001. Oligopoly Pricing. MIT Press: Cambridge Massachusetts. Young HP, 1998. Individual Strategy and Social Structure, an Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. Princeton University Press: Princeton New Jersey.