The Euro Area sovereign debt crisis: Some implications of its systemic dimension

Pessoa, Argentino (2011): The Euro Area sovereign debt crisis: Some implications of its systemic dimension.

Abstract

After the beginning of the euro area, countries in its periphery engaged in weighty borrowing from foreign private investors, allowing domestic spending to outpace incomes. Now, these countries face debt crises reflecting a loss of creditor confidence in the sustainability of their finances from which results an abrupt end in private foreign lending to these economies. The debt crisis made evident the asymmetry between core and periphery countries, which is visible in trends in saving, consumption and investment. These divergent patterns have contributed to view the debt crisis as a problem of the PIIGS (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, Spain) that can be contained in the periphery, or as a new version of the fable of the Grasshopper and the Ant. We dispute this reductionism showing that the debt crisis is systemic and its solution cannot be found with more fiscal rules and austerity in peripheral countries alone. It will imply, if not an increase in fiscal and political integration, at least a higher coordination at the political and economic front and a new governance structure.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Debt crisis; Euro Area; EFSF; ESM; Fiscal rules; PIIGS; Systemic crisis; Solvency
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F34 - International Lending and Debt Problems; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F36 - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration; G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G01 - Financial Crises

References

Alesina A., and T. Bayoumi (1996), “The costs and benefits of fiscal rules: evidence from U.S. states”, NBER working papers no. 5614.

Alesina, AL. and R. Wacziarg, 1999, Is Europe going too far? Carnegie-Rochester Conference volume, supplement Journal of Monetary Economics, December, 1-42.

Arezki, R., B. Candelon and A. Sy (2011), “Sovereign Rating News and Financial Markets Spillovers: Evidence from the European Debt Crisis”, IMF Working Paper, 11/69, March.

Ayuso-i-Casals, J., D. Gonzalez Hernandez, L. Moulin, and A. Turrini (2009), “Beyond the SGP: Features and effects of EU national fiscal rules”, in: ibid., Servaas Deroose, Elena Flores, and Laurent Moulin (eds.), Policy instruments for sound fiscal policies: fiscal rules and institutions, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 204-220.

Barrios, S., P. Iversen, M. Lewandowska, and R. Setzer (2009), “Determinants of intra-euro area government bond spreads during the financial crisis”, European Economy - Economic Papers 388, Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs.

Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen (1994), “Restraining yourself: fiscal rules and stabilization”, CEPR discussion papers no. 1029.

Bayoumi, T., M. Goldstein, and G. Woglom (1995), “Do credit markets discipline sovereign borrowers? Evidence from U.S.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27 (4), pp. 1046-1059.

Beetsma, R, B Bluhm, M Giuliodori, and P Wierts (2011), “From First-Release to Ex-Post Fiscal Data: Exploring the Sources of Revision Errors in the EU”, CEPR Discussion Paper 8413.

Berglof, Erik, Barry Eichengreen, Gérard Roland, Guido Tabellini, and Charles Wyplosz (2003), Built to Last: A Political Architecture for Europe, CEPR Report, MEI 12.

Bernoth, K. and G. Wolff (2008), “Fool the markets? Creative accounting, fiscal transparency and sovereign risk premia”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 55(4), pp. 465-87.

Bohn, H. and R. Inman (1996), “Balanced-budget rules and public deficits: evidence from the U.S. states”, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 45(1), pp. 13-76.

Buti, M., J. Nogueira Martins, and A. Turrini (2006), “From deficits to debt and back: political incentives under numerical fiscal rules”, CEPR discussion papers no. 5809.

Dafflon, B, 2002, Local Public Finance in Europe: Balancing the Budget and Controlling Debt, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

De Grauwe, P. (1992), The Economics of Monetary Integration, 1st Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Grauwe, P. (2010), A Mechanism of Self-destruction of the Eurozone, CEPS Policy Briefs. (Available at http://www.ceps.eu/book/mechanism-self-destruction-eurozone).

De Grauwe, Paul (2011) “The Governance of a Fragile Eurozone”, CEPS Working Document No. 346, May. Available for free downloading from the CEPS website (http://www.ceps.eu).

Debrun, X. (2007), Tying hands is not commitment: can fiscal rules and institutions really enhance fiscal discipline? Bruegel working paper no. 2007/01.

Debrun, X., and M. Kumar (2007) “The discipline-enhancing role of fiscal institutions: theory and empirical evidence”," IMF working papers no. 07/171, Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

Debrun, X., Moulin, L., Turrini, A., Ayuso-i-Casals, J. and M. S. Kumar (2008), "Tied to the Mast? National Fiscal Rules in the European Union", Economic Policy, CEPR, CES, MSH, vol. 23, pages 297-362, April.

Eichengreen, B. and T. Bayoumi (1994), “The political economy of fiscal restrictions: implications for Europe from the United States”, European Economic Review 38, pp. 783-791.

European Commission (1977), Report of the Study Group on the Role of Public Finance in European Integration (MacDougall Report), Brussels.

European Commission (2011), Public finances in EMU – 2011, European Economy 3, European Commission / Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.

Giavazzi, Francesco, and Luigi Spaventa. 2010. “The European Commission’s Proposals: Empty and Useless.” Vox, October 14. (Available at http://wwwvoxeu.org/index.php?q=node/5680).

Gros, Daniel and Thomas Mayer (2010), Towards a European Monetary Fund, CEPS Policy Brief (http://www.ceps.eu/book/towards-european-monetary-fund).

Hallerberg, M., R. Strauch, and J. von Hagen (2007), “The design of fiscal rules and forms of governance in European Union countries”, European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), pp. 338-359.

Hallerberg, M., R. Strauch, and J. von Hagen (2009), Fiscal governance in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hallerberg, Mark, and Guntram Wolff (2008), “Fiscal institutions, fiscal policy and sovereign risk premia in EMU”, Public Choice 136 (3-4), pp. 379-396.

Higgins, Matthew and Thomas Klitgaard (2011) “Saving Imbalances and the Euro Area Sovereign Debt Crisis”, Current Issues In Economics And Finance, Volume 17, Number 5, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Inman, R. (1996), “Do balanced-budget rules work? U.S. experience and possible lessons for the EMU”, NBER working papers no. 1996.

Issing, O. (2009), Why a common Eurozone bond isn’t such a good idea, Europe’s World, Summer, 77-79.

Johnson, C. and K. Kriz (2005), “Fiscal institutions, credit ratings, and borrowing costs”, Public Budgeting & Finance 25 (1), pp. 84-103.

Joshi, Vijay and Robert Skidelsky (2010) “Keynes, global imbalances, and international monetary reform, today” in Claessens, Stijn, Simon Evenett and Bernard Hoekman (eds), Rebalancing the Global Economy: A Primer for Policymaking. A VoxEU.org Publication, pp. 173-179. (available at: http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/5219#anchor)

Juncker, J.-C. and G. Tremonti (2010), “E-bonds would end the crisis”, Financial Times, December, 5.

Krogstrup, S. and C. Wyplosz (2010), “A common pool theory of supranational deficit ceilings”, European Economic Review 54, pp. 269-278.

Larch, M. and A. Turrini (2008), “Received wisdom and beyond: lessons from fiscal consolidation in the EU”, European Economy - Economic Papers 320, Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs.

Mueller, D., 1997, Federalism and the European Union: A constitutional perspective, Public Choice 90, 255-280.

Oates, W., 2001, Fiscal competition and European Union: contrasting perspectives, Regional Science and Urban Economics 31, 133-145.

Peirce, P., S. Micossi and J.Carmassi (2011), “On the Tasks of the European Stability Mechanism”, CEPS Policy Brief, March.

Persson, T., G. Roland and G. Tabellini, 1997, The theory of fiscal federalism: What does it mean for Europe, in H. Siebert (ed.), Quo Vadis Europe?, Tubingen: JCB Mohr, 23-41.

Poterba, J. and K. Rueben (1999), “State fiscal institutions and the U.S. municipal bond market,” in James Poterba and Jürgen von Hagen (eds.), Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance, Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 181-207.

Rodden, J., G. Eskeland and J. Litvack (eds.), 2003, Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints, Washington DC: The World Bank.

Skidelsky, Robert (2011). “The relevance of Keynes” Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 35 (1), pp. 1-13.

Tabellini, G., 2003, Principles of policymaking in the European Union: An economic perspective, CESifo Economic Studies, 49, 1, 75-102.

von Hagen, J. (1991), “A note on the empirical effectiveness of formal fiscal restraints,” Journal of Public Economics 44(2), pp. 199-210.

von Hagen, J. (2010), “Sticking to fiscal plans: the role of institutions,” Public Choice 144, pp. 487-503.

von Hagen, J. and B. Eichengreen, 1996, Federalism, fiscal restraints, and European Monetary Union, American Economic Review 2, 86, 134-138.

von Hagen, J. and G. Wolff (2006), “What do deficits tell us about debt? Empirical evidence on creative accounting with fiscal rules in the EU”, Journal of Banking and Finance 30(12), pp. 3259-3279.