Häseler, Sönke (2011): Individual enforcement rights in international sovereign bonds.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_35331.pdf Download (270kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Sovereign bond contracts are notoriously hard to enforce. The few rights that bondholders have can be vested either collectively or individually. It seems that investors traditionally had a preference for the latter, which hindered financial market reform projects, such as the universal adoption of collective action clauses or trust structures. This paper discusses theoretically and empirically whether it is indeed in the bondholders’ collective interest to be allowed to individually sue and attach the debtor country’s assets following a default. Market reaction to the landmark case of Elliott Associates v. Peru is tested to assess just how much bondholders actually value individual enforcement rights. It is found that even the single most important event to reinforce creditor rights in recent years provoked no systematic movement in bond prices. We thus conclude that perhaps the importance of individual enforcement rights to the markets has been exaggerated and we therefore recommend ignoring any opposition from market participants that may arise during the necessary transition to more collective enforcement rights.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Individual enforcement rights in international sovereign bonds |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | sovereign bonds; enforcement rights; Elliott Associates; Peru; collective action clauses; fiscal agent; trustee |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F34 - International Lending and Debt Problems K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K33 - International Law K - Law and Economics > K1 - Basic Areas of Law > K12 - Contract Law |
Item ID: | 35331 |
Depositing User: | Sönke Häseler |
Date Deposited: | 11 Dec 2011 02:04 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 19:24 |
References: | Alfaro, L., N. Maurer, and F. Ahmed (2008) “Gunboats and Vultures: Market Reaction to the ‘Enforcement’ of Sovereign Debt” working paper, Harvard Business School, http://economics.rutgers.edu/dmdocuments/Gunboats.pdf Borensztein, E. and U. Panizza (2008) “The Costs of Sovereign Default” IMF Working Paper 08/238 Buchheit, L.C. (2007) "Supermajority Control Wins Out" International Financial Law Review 26(4):2 Buchheit, L.C. and J.S. Pam (2004) “The Pari Passu Clause in Sovereign Debt Instruments” working paper, www.law.georgetown.edu/international/documents/Pam.pdf Buchheit, L.C. and G.M. Gulati (2000) “Exit Consents in Sovereign Bond Exchanges” University of California Law Review 48: 59-84 Buchheit, L.C. and G.M. Gulati (2002) “Sovereign Bonds and the Collective Will” Emory Law Journal 51:1317 Buchheit, L.C. and G.M Gulati (2009) “The Coroner’s Inquest” International Financial Law Review 29(9): 22-25 Buchheit, L.C. and E. Karpinski (2006) “Grenada’s Innovations” Journal of International Banking and Regulation 4:227-231 Bulow, J. and K. Rogoff (1987) "A Constant Recontracting Model of Sovereign Debt" University of Wisconsin: Social Systems Research Institute Working Paper no. 8711 Bulow, J. and K. Rogoff (1988) "Sovereign Debt: Is to Forgive to Forget?" NBER Working Paper no. 2623 Bradley, M., J.D. Cox, and G.M. Gulati (2008) “The Market Reaction to Legal Shocks and Their Antidotes: Lessons from the Sovereign Debt Market” working paper, Institute for Law and Finance, Frankfurt University, www.ilf-frankfurt.de/uploads/media/ILF_WP_087.pdf Bratton, W.W. and G.M. Gulati (2003) “Sovereign Debt Restructuring and the Best Interest of Creditors” Georgetown University Law Centre, Working Paper No. 387880 Dixon, L. and Wall, D. (2000) “Collective Action Problems and Collective Action Clauses” Financial Stability Review 8:142-151 Dooley, M.P. (2000) "Can Output Losses Following International Finacial Crises Be Avoided?" NBER Working Paper no. 7531 Fisch, J.E. and C.M. Gentile (2004) “Vultures or Vanguards? The Role of Litigation in Sovereign Debt Restructuring“ Emory Law Journal 53(1043):1047-1116 Gulati, G.M. and K.N. Klee (2001) “Sovereign Piracy” The Business Lawyer 56:635-51 Grande, A. and D.C. Parsley (2005) "News Spillovers in the Sovereign Debt Market" Journal of Financial Economics 75(3):691-734 27 Group of Ten (2002) “Report of the G-10 Working Group on Contractual Clauses”, Bank for International Settlements, Basel. Häseler, S. (2009) “Collective Action Clauses in International Sovereign Bond Contracts – Whence the Opposition?” Journal of Economic Surveys 23(5):882-923 Häseler, S. (2010) “Trustees versus Fiscal Agents and Default Risk in International Sovereign Bonds“ German Working Papers in Law and Economics, www.bepress.com/gwp/default/vol2010/iss1/art1 Inter-American Development Bank (2006) “The Costs of Default”, chapter 12 of Economic and Social Progress Report 2007, www.iadb.org/res/ipes/2007 Kahan, M. (2002) “Rethinking Corporate Bonds: The Trade-Off between Individual and Collective Rights“ NYU Law Review 77(4):1040-1087 Kim, G.M. (2004) "EMBI Global and EMBI Global Diversified: Rules and Methodology" J. P. Morgan Securities Inc., http://data.cbonds.info/indexdocs/g_eng_37.pdf Miller, M. and D. Thomas (2006) “Sovereign Debt Restructuring: the Judge, the Vultures and Creditor Rights”, The World Economy 30(10) Moser, C. (2007) “The Impact of Political Risk on Sovereign Bond Spreads - Evidence from Latin America”, Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Verein für Socialpolitik, Göttingen Roe, M.J. (1987) “The Voting Prohibition in Bond Workouts“ The Yale Law Journal 97(2):232-279 Rose, A.K. (2005) “One Reason Countries Pay Their Debts: Renegotiation and International Trade” Journal of Development Economics 77(1):189-206 Scott, H.S. (2006) “Sovereign Debt Default: Cry for the United States, Not Argentina” Washington Legal Foundation Critical Legal Issues Working Paper No. 140, www.wlf.org/upload/ Scott%20WP%20Final.pdf Sturzenegger, F. and J. Zettelmeyer (2006a) “Has the Legal Threat to Sovereign Debt Restructuring Become Real?” working paper, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/ udtwpbsdt/legalthreat.htm Sturzenegger, F. and J. Zettelmeyer (2006b) Debt Defaults and Lessons from a Decade of Crises. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Sturzenegger, F. and J. Zettelmeyer (2008) “Haircuts: Estimating Investor Losses in Sovereign Debt Restructurings, 1998 – 2005” Journal of International Money and Finance 27(5):780-805 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/35331 |