Investment and current utility change in dynamically inefficient economies

Bazhanov, Andrei (2011): Investment and current utility change in dynamically inefficient economies.

Abstract

An extensive literature shows the importance of investment policy for sustainability of resource-based economies by examining the role of investment in current utility change (CUC) for a competitive optimizing economy. This paper extends some of these results by analysing the dependence of CUC on genuine investment (GI), expressed in marginal resource productivity, under dynamic inefficiency. The inefficiency arises when a social planner, due to imperfection in knowledge or in institutions, does not take into account deviations of real economy from a theoretical model. These deviations or distortions, connected with the resource extraction, can influence utility, production, the balance equation, and the dynamics of the reserve. The analysis of this natural discrepancy between theory and real life implies that: first, institutional and resource policies in inefficient economies may be more important for CUC than investment policy; and secondly, under uncertainties in production possibilities and in damages from economic activities, sustainability requires a more cautious resource policy than is advised by a theory. The paper also suggests that the indicators GI, expressed in accounting prices and in marginal resource productivity, can complement each other in sustainability evaluation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: nonrenewable resource; dynamic inefficiency; genuine investment; resource policy; sustainable development
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q32 - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q38 - Government Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products

References

Arrow KJ, Dasgupta P, Mäler, KG (2003) Evaluating projects and assessing sustainable development in imperfect economies. Environ Resource Econ 26: 647--685

Bazhanov AV (2010) Sustainable growth: compatibility between a plausible growth criterion and the initial state. Resources Pol 35: 116--125

Bazhanov AV (2011a) A closed-form solution to Stollery's problem with damage in utility. Comput Econ (forthcoming). DOI 10.1007/s10614-010-9249-4

Bazhanov AV (2011b) The dependence of the potential sustainability of a resource economy on the initial state: a comparison of models using the example of Russian oil extraction. J New Econ Association 12: (forthcoming)

Dasgupta P, Heal G (1974) The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Rev Econ Stud 41: 3--28

Dasgupta P, Heal G (1979) Economic theory and exhaustible resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

D'Autume A, Schubert, K (2008) Hartwick's rule and maximin paths when the exhaustible resource has an amenity value. J Environ Econ Manage 56: 260--274

Dixit A, Hammond P, Hoel M (1980) On Hartwick's rule for regular maximin paths of capital accumulation and resource depletion. Rev Econ Stud 47: 551--556

Gaudet G, Moreaux M, Withagen C (2006) The Alberta dilemma: optimal sharing of a water resource by an agricultural and an oil sector. J Environ Econ Manage 52: 548--566

Gaudet G (2007) Natural resource economics under the rule of Hotelling. Can J Econ 40: 1033--1059

Hamilton K, Clemens M (1999) Genuine savings rates in developing countries. World Bank Economic Review 13(2): 333--356

Hamilton K, Hartwick JM (2005) Investing exhaustible resource rents and the path of consumption. Can J Econ 38: 615--621

Hamilton K, Ruta G, Tajibaeva L (2006) Capital accumulation and resource depletion: a Hartwick Rule counterfactual. Environ Resource Econ 34: 517--533

Hamilton K, Withagen C (2007) Savings growth and the path of utility. Can J Econ 40: 703--713

Hartwick JM (1977) Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources. Amer Econ Rev 67: 972--974

Hurwicz L (1960) Optimality and informational efficiency in resource allocation processes. In: Arrow KJ, Karlin S, Suppes P (eds) Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp 27--46

Pearce DW, Atkinson GD (1993) Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of "weak" sustainability. Ecol Econ 8: 103--108

Pezzey JCV (1992) Sustainable development concepts: An economic analysis. World Bank Environment Paper No. 2. World Bank, Washington, DC

Proops JLR, Atkinson G, Schlotheim BFv, Simon S (1999) International trade and the sustainability footprint: a practical criterion for its assessment. Ecol Econ 28: 75--97

Solow RM (1974) Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Rev Econ Stud 41: 29--45

Stiglitz J (1974) Growth with exhaustible natural resources: efficient and optimal growth paths. Rev Econ Stud 41: 123--137

Stollery KR (1998) Constant utility paths and irreversible global warming. Can J Econ 31: 730--742

Takayama A (1980) Optimal technical progress with exhaustible resources. In: Kemp M, Long NV (eds) Exhaustible Resources, Optimality and Trade. North-Holland, New York, pp 95--110

van der Ploeg F (2011) Rapacious resource depletion, excessive investment and insecure property rights: a puzzle. Environ Resource Econ 48: 105--128

Weitzman ML (2010) What is the "damages function" for global warming -- and what difference might it make? Climate Change Econ 1(1): 57--69