Towards effective emerging infectious disease surveillance: Cambodia, Indonesia, and NAMRU-2

Ear, Sophal (2011): Towards effective emerging infectious disease surveillance: Cambodia, Indonesia, and NAMRU-2.

Abstract

Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) pose international security threats because of their potential to inflict harm upon humans, crops, livestock, health infrastructure, and economies. The following questions stimulated the research described in this report: What infrastructure is necessary to enable EID surveillance in developing countries? What are the cultural, political, and economic challenges that are faced? Are there generalizations that may be made to inform engagement with developing countries and support EID surveillance infrastructure? Using the U.S. Naval Area Medical Research Unit No. 2 (NAMRU-2) as a common denominator, this report compares barriers to EID surveillance in Cambodia and in Indonesia and presents key factors—uncovered through extensive interviews—that constrain disease surveillance systems. In Cambodia, the key factors that emerged were low salaries, poor staff and human resources management and the effect of patronage networks, a culture of donor dependence, contrasting priorities between the government and international donors, and the lack of compensation for animal culling. Cambodian authorities have resisted a compensation scheme thus far, with speculation suggesting that the reason for this is the government’s concern that the possibility for corruption among poultry-holders is too great a risk. The Cambodian military has also played a part. The government ceased a merit-based salary supplement scheme for civil servants (including laboratory employees funded by the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria) after the military is alleged to have demanded similar pay incentives which donors had no interest in funding. In Indonesia, the key issues emerging as barriers to effective surveillance include poor host-donor relationships, including differing host-donor priorities and a misunderstanding of NAMRU-2 by Indonesian Authorities; low salaries; a decline in the qualifications of personnel in the Ministry of Health; poor compensation for culling; and difficulties incentivizing local-level reporting in an era of decentralization. Conflict between external and host actors was given the greatest emphasis, with “viral sovereignty” the primary problem. The Indonesian government perceived unfair treatment when it was asked to pay millions of dollars for a vaccine developed from a sample it originally provided for diagnostic purposes to the U.S. government through NAMRU-2. A poor host-donor relationship is a major barrier in Indonesia, which exhibits greater political and financial autonomy than Cambodia and other less-developed countries. Ultimately these differences are symptomatic of Cambodia’s and Indonesia’s different levels of development and their roles within the international community. This context demonstrates the primary difference in existing barriers to surveillance between the countries. Thus, it is reasonable to hypothesize that other developing countries face similar barriers along a continuum from one extreme (Cambodia, where a genocide resulted in the death of a quarter of the population) to another (Indonesia, where state-of-the-art-labs can be run by Indonesians educated in countries such as France and Australia with some donor funds). Scientists are fully capable of fixing technical problems in surveillance systems, but non-technical barriers have been more difficult to confront. Not surprisingly, the primary challenges impeding surveillance are observed on the human resources side of the equation. When it comes to viral sovereignty, technology transfer has been proposed as a possible solution to enable resource-constrained countries to produce their own vaccines. Yet this is easier said than done; international development has tried for more than six decades to raise living standards with limited success. What is certain is that Indonesia’s human resources are already capable of producing some vaccines given sufficient technology, while Cambodia will require a decade or more to develop such a capability. It is clear that in Cambodia, technology transfer is necessary but not sufficient. Many of the key factors emerging from interviews with in-country practitioners are the direct result of the existing level of development and, as such, are perhaps beyond the scope of health and scientific agencies at this point. Nevertheless, greater understanding is a critical first step in mitigating negative outcomes.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Cambodia, Indonesia, Namru-2, Avian Influenza, H5N1, Political Economy
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K32 - Environmental, Health, and Safety Law; N - Economic History > N3 - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy > N35 - Asia including Middle East; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H51 - Government Expenditures and Health; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy ; Regulation ; Public Health

References

DTRA (2008). Anticipating the species jump: surveillance for emerging viral threats. Research in Progress, Defense Threat Reduction Agency Advanced Systems and Concepts Office. 4 December.

Brachman, P. S., O’Maonaigh, H. C., & Miller, R. N. (Eds.) (2001). Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: a program review (p. 50). Institute of Medicine (IOM), National Academies Press. https://download.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10203&page=R1, accessed 8 October 2011.

Budianto, L. (2010). RI aims at resolution of military ban in US partnership: Ministry. The Jakarta Post, 5 March. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2010/03/05/ri-aims-resolution-military-ban-us-partnership-ministry.html, accessed 8 October 2011.

Ear, S. (2011). The political economy of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Cambodia. International Journal of Poultry Science, 10(1), 71-75.

Ear, S., & Burgos, S. (2009). Livelihoods and highly pathogenic avian influenza in Cambodia. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 65(4), 633-640.

Forster, P. (2009). The political economy of avian influenza in Indonesia. STEPS Working Paper 17, Social, Technological and Environmental Pathways to Sustainability Centre, Brighton. http://www.steps-centre.org/PDFs/Indonesia.pdf, accessed 8 October 2011.

GAO (General Accounting Office). (2001). Global health: challenges in improving infectious disease surveillance systems (p. 3). Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO-01-722, United States General Accounting Office, August.

Gresham, L., Ramlawi, A., Briski, J., Richardson, M., & Taylor, T. (2009). Trust across borders: responding to 2009 H1N1 influenza in the Middle East. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 7(4), 403.

Hickler, B. (2007). Bridging the gap between HPAI awareness and practice in Cambodia: recommendations from an anthropological participatory assessment. Emergency Centre for Transboundary Animal Diseases, FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. http://www.fao.org/docs/eims/upload//241483/ai301e00.pdf, accessed 8 October 2011.

Holsti, O. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.

IOM (Institute of Medicine). (2010). Infectious disease movement in a borderless world: workshop summary (p. 181). Institute of Medicine, the National Academies Press.

Jakarta Post, The. (2010). Obama Visit “Opens Door for RI.” The Jakarta Post, 8 February. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2010/02/08/obama-visit-%E2%80%98opens-doors-ri%E2%80%99.html, accessed 8 October 2011.

Lasswell, H. (1951). The analysis of political behavior: an empirical approach. London: Routledge.

Lowe, C. (2010). Preparing Indonesia: H5N1 influenza through the lens of global health. Indonesia, 90(October), 147-170.

Merianos, A. (2007). Surveillance and response to disease emergence. In J. E. Childs, J. S. Mackenzie, & J. A. Richt (Eds.), Wildlife and emerging zoonotic diseases: the biology, circumstances and consequences of cross-species transmission. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Normile, D. (2005). First human case in Cambodia highlights surveillance shortcomings. Science, 307(5712), 1027.

O’Toole, J., & Chakrya, K. S. (2011). World bank blunder. Phnom Penh Post, 9 March.

Peake, J. B., Morrison, J. S., Ledgerwood, M. M., & Gannon, S. E. (2011). The Defense Department’s enduring contributions to global health: the future of the U.S. Army and Navy Overseas Medical Research Laboratories (p. 21). Center for Strategic and International Studies, June. http://csis.org/publication/defense-departments-enduring-contributions-global-health, accessed 8 October 2011.

Restuadhi, H. (2008). Bird flu: chicken consumption, rearing practices and perception of poultry diseases (p. 31). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, December.

Ricks, D. (2010). The intellectual property fight that could kill millions. Discover Magazine (Online Edition), 28 January. http://discovermagazine.com/2009/dec/28-intellectual-property-fight-that-could-kill-millions/article_view?b_start:int=2&-C=, accessed 8 October 2011.

Samaan, G., Patel, M., Olowokure,B., Roces, M., Oshitani, H. and the World Health Organization Outbreak Response Team (2005) “Rumor Surveillance and Avian Influenza H5N1”, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 11, No. 3, March, p. 464.

Simamora, A. (2009). Let me prove it all in my work: Endang. The Jakarta Post, 29 October. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/10/29/let-me-prove-it-all-my-work-endang.html, accessed 8 October 2011.

Wallace, J., and Bopha, P. (2010). Tension over end of civil service bonus scheme. The Cambodia Daily, 44(51).

Wenzel, R. P. What we learned from H1N1’s first year. The New York Times, 13 April 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/opinion/13wenzel.html, accessed 8 October 2011.

Zacher, M. (1999). Global epidemiological surveillance: international cooperation to monitor infectious diseases. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. A. Stern (Eds.), Global public goods: international cooperation in the 21st century. http://www.undp.org/globalpublicgoods/TheBook/thebook.html, accessed 8 October 2011.