Lux, Matthias (2011): Defying Gravity: The Substitutability of Transportation in International Trade.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_36395.pdf Download (807kB) | Preview |
Abstract
What role do individual modes of transportation play in international trade? To study this question, I develop a model of international trade that incorporates a role for transportation and thus allows me to study mode-specific trade flows. I use a novel data set to estimate the complete model for a sample of 79 countries distinguishing air, sea, and surface transportation. The estimated model implies that surface transportation is mostly used for trade over short distances, whereas air and sea transportation dominate long-distance trade. Furthermore, the different modes of transportation display a high degree of substitutability. Using counterfactual analysis I show the implications for the roles played by the different modes of transportation. Long-distance modes are more important for poor countries because in order for them to realize gains from trade they need access to technologically advanced but far-away markets. Rich countries, on the other hand, can substitute long-distance trade more easily for trade with neighboring countries without changing the gains from trade much. As a consequence, reducing the estimated asymmetries in mode-specific trade costs for only one long-distance mode, either air or sea, can reduce income differences in the sample by about 35%.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Defying Gravity: The Substitutability of Transportation in International Trade |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | international trade; transportation; trade costs; economic geography |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade |
Item ID: | 36395 |
Depositing User: | Matthias Lux |
Date Deposited: | 04 Feb 2012 12:22 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 15:25 |
References: | ALESSANDRIA , G., J. KABOSKI , AND V. MIDRIGAN (2008): “Inventories, Lumpy Trade, and Large Devaluations,” mimeo. ALVAREZ , F., AND R. E. LUCAS (2007): “General Equilibrium Analysis of the Eaton-Kortum Model of International Trade,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(6), 1726– 1768. ANDERSON , J. E., AND E. VAN WINCOOP (2003): “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle,” American Economic Review, 93(1), 170 – 192. ---, (2004): “Trade Costs,” Journal of Economic Literature, XLII, 691 – 751. ARKOLAKIS , C., A. COSTINOT, AND A. RODRIGUEZ -CLARE (2010): “New Trade Models,Same Old Gains?,” mimeo. BRODA , C., AND D. E. W EINSTEIN (2006): “Globalization and the Gains from Variety,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 541–585. CAMERON , A. C., AND P. K. TRIVEDI (2005): Microeconometrics – Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. CASELLI , F. (2005): “Accounting for Cross-Country Income Differences,” in Handbook of Economic Growth, ed. by P. Aghion, and S. Durlauf, chap. 9, pp. 679 – 741. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CHANEY, T. (2008): “Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margin of International Trade,” American Economic Review, 98(4), 1707 – 1721. CLARK , X., D. DOLLAR, AND A. MICCO (2004): “Port Efficiency, Maritime Transport Costs, and Bilateral Trade,” Journal of Development Economics, 75, 417 – 450. DEKLE , R., J. EATON, AND S. KORTUM (2008): “Global Rebalancing with Gravity: Measuring the Burden of Adjustment,” IMF Staff Papers, 55, 511–540. DISDIER , A.-C., AND K. HEAD (2008): “The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1), 37 – 48. DONALDSON , D. (2008): “Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the Impact of Transportation Infrastructure,” mimeo. EATON , J., AND S. KORTUM (2002): “Technology, Geography, and Trade,” Econometrica, 70(5), 1741 – 1779. EVANS , C. L., AND J. HARRIGAN (2005): “Distance, Time, and Specialization: Lean Retailing in General Equilibrium,” American Economic Review, 95(1), 292 – 313. FEENSTRA , R., R. LIPSEY, AND H. B OWEN (1997): “World Trade Flows, 1970 - 1992, with Production and Tariff Data,” NBER Working Paper 5910. FEYRER , J. (2009): “Trade and Income - Exploiting Time Series in Geography,” NBER Working Paper 14910. FIELER , A. C. (2009): “Non-Homotheticity and Bilateral Trade: Evidence and a Quantitative Explanation,” mimeo. FOGEL , R. W. (1964): Railways and American Economic Growth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press. HARRIGAN , J. (2009): “Airplanes and Comparative Advantage,” mimeo. HELPMAN , E., M. MELITZ , AND Y. RUBINSTEIN (2008): “Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441 – 487. HESTON , A., R. SUMMERS, AND B. ATEN (2009): “Penn World Table 6.3,” Discussion paper, Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income, and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania. HUMMELS , D. (2001): “Time as a Trade Barrier,” mimeo. ----, (2007): “Transportation Costs and International Trade in the Second Era of Globalization,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 131 – 154. HUMMELS , D., AND V. LUGOVSKYY (2006): “Are Matched Partner Trade Statistics a Usable Measure of Transportation Costs?,” Review of International Economics, 14(1), 69 – 86. HUMMELS , D., V. LUGOVSKYY, AND A. S KIBA (2009): “The Trade Reducing Effects of Market Power in International Shipping,” Journal of Development Economics, 89(1), 84 – 97. HUMMELS , D., AND G. S CHAUR (2010): “Hedging Price Volatility Using Fast Transport,” Journal of International Economics, 82(1), 15–25. LIMAO, N., AND A. J. V ENABLES (2001): “Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade,” World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 451 – 479. LUX , M. (2010): “The Mode of Transportation in International Trade,” mimeo. MASKUS , K. (1991): “Comparing International Trade Data and Product and National Characteristics Data for the Analysis of Trade Models,” in International Economic Transactions: Issues in Measurement and Empirical Research, ed. by P Hooper, and J. Richardson, vol. 55 of National Bureau of Economic Research Studies in Income and Wealth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. MELITZ , M. J. (2003): “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity,” Econometrica, 71(6), 1695 – 1725. MICCO, A., AND T. SEREBRISKY (2006): “Competition Regimes and Air Transport Costs: The Effects of Open Skies Agreements,” Journal of International Economics, 70(1), 25 – 51. NELSEN , R. B. (2006): An Introduction to Copulas. New York: Springer, 2nd edn. OVERMAN , H. G., S. J. REDDING, AND A. J. V ENABLES (2004): “The Economic Geography of Trade, Production, and Income: A Survey of Empirics,” in Handbook of International Trade, ed. by E. K. Choi, and J. Harrigan, chap. 12, pp. 353 – 387. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. RAMONDO, N., AND A. RODRIGUEZ -C LARE (2009): “Trade, Multinational Production, and the Gains from Openness,” mimeo. SAMUELSON , P. A. (1954): “The Transfer Problem and Transport Costs, II: Analysis of Effects of Trade Impediments,” Economic Journal, 64(254), 264–289. SIMONOVSKA , I., AND M. E. WAUGH (2009): “The Elasticity of Trade: Estimates and Evidence,” mimeo. VON T HUENEN , J. H. (1826): Der isoierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationaloekonomie. Hamburg: Perthes. WAUGH, M. E. (2010): “International Trade and Income Differences,” American Economic Review, 100(5), 2093–2124. WORLD BANK (2009): World Development Report: Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington D.C.: The World Bank. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/36395 |