Antoci, Angelo and Borghesi, Simone and Russu, Paolo (2011): Environmental protection mechanisms and technological dynamics. Forthcoming in: Economic Modelling
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_36597.pdf Download (243kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper proposes a new financial mechanism that could be implemented to protect the environment of a tourist region. For this purpose, we investigate the potential consequences of two financial activities, issued by the local government (\emph{G}) of a region\emph{\ R}, which work like contracts between \emph{G} and, respectively, visitors of\emph{\ R }and firms operating in\emph{\ R}. According to these contracts, agents who decide to visit \emph{R }(firms that decide to adopt an environmental friendly technology) have to buy an option that entitle them to get a partial or total reimbursement if environmental quality in \emph{R} turns out to be sufficiently low (high), namely, below (above) a given predetermined threshold level.
Using a two-population evolutionary game model, we analyze the dynamics emerging from the model and prove that under such fund rising mechanism the virtuous equilibrium (in which all firms adopt the pollution-free technology and all agents choose to visit the region) is always locally attractive. Furthermore, we show that the attraction basin of the poverty trap equilibrium (in which no firm adopts the clean technology and no tourist comes the region) can be decreased by raising the reimbursement offered by the local government to the visitors. Finally, using numerical simulations, it can be shown that the dynamics of the model may give rise to another attractive stationary state in correspondence of the environmental quality threshold determined by the government, as well as to a limit cycle that oscillates around the threshold.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Environmental protection mechanisms and technological dynamics |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | environmental protection; financial instruments; technological innovation; evolutionary dynamics |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C73 - Stochastic and Dynamic Games ; Evolutionary Games ; Repeated Games |
Item ID: | 36597 |
Depositing User: | paolo russu |
Date Deposited: | 13 Feb 2012 18:01 |
Last Modified: | 09 Oct 2019 16:41 |
References: | 1. Antoci A., Bartolini S., 1999. Negative Externalities as the Engine of Growth in an Evolutionary Context. Working paper 83.99, Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei, Milan. 2. Antoci A., Bartolini S., 2004. Negative Externalities and Labor Input in an Evolutionary Game. Environment and Development Economics, 9, 1-22. 3. Antoci, A., Borghesi, S., Russu, P., 2005. Environmental defensive ex- penditures, expectations and growth. Population and Environment, 27, 227-244. 4. Antoci, A., Galeotti, M. Geronazzo, L. 2007. Visitor and rm taxes ver- sus environmental options in a dynamical context. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2007, Article ID 97540, doi:10.1155/2007/97540. 5. Antoci, A., Borghesi, S., Galeotti, M., 2008. Should we replace the envi- ronment? Limits of Economic Growth in the Presence of Self-Protective Choices. International Journal of Social Economics, 35, 283-297. 6. Antoci, A., Dei, R., Galeotti, M., 2009a. Financing the adoption of envi- ronment preserving technologies via innovative nancial instruments: An evolutionary game approach. Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications 71, 952-959. 7. Antoci, A., Borghesi, S., Galeotti, M., 2009b. Environmental options and technological innovation. Working Paper No.90.2009, Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei, Milan. Forthcoming in Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 8. Antoci, A., Borghesi, S., 2010. Environmental degradation, self-protection choices and coordination failures in a North-South evolutionary model. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 5, 89-107. 9. Antoci, A., Naimzada, A., Sodini, M., 2010. Bifurcations and chaotic at- tractors in an overlapping generations model with negative environmental externalities, in Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics, Finance and Social Sciences, Bischi G., Chiarella C. e Gardini L. (eds.), Springer Verlag, Am- sterdam. 10. Bartolini, S., Bonatti, L., 2002. Environmental and social degradation as the engine of economic growth. Ecological Economics, 43, 1-16. 11. Bartolini, S., Bonatti, L., 2003. Undesirable Growth in a Model with Capital Accumulation and Environmental Assets. Environment and De- velopment Economics, 8, 11-30. 12. Bohm, P., 1981. Deposit-refund systems, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 13. Coria, J., Hennlock, M., 2010. Taxes, Permits and Costly Policy Response to Technological Change. Working paper in Economics No. 442, Univer- sity of Gothenburg, Sweden. 14. Costanza, R., Perrings, C., 1990. A exible assurance bonding system for improved environmental management, Ecological Economics, 2, 57-75. 15. Crocker, T.D., 1966. The structuring of atmospheric pollution control systems. In: Wolozin, H. (Ed.), The Economics of Air Pollution. Norton, New York, pp.61-86. 16. Dales, J., 1968. Pollution, property and prices, University Press, Toronto. 17. Di Vita, G., 2009. Legal families and environmental protection: is there a causal relationship?, Journal of Policy Modeling, 31, 694-707. 18. Gerard, D., Wilson, E.J., 2009. Environmental bonds and the problem of long-term carbon sequestration, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1097-1105. 19. Guckenheimer, J., Holmes, P., 1983. Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems and bifurcation of vector elds, Springer, Berlin. 20. Horesh, R., 2000. Injecting incentives into the solution of social problems. Social policy bonds, Economic Affairs, 20, 39-42. 21. Horesh, R., 2002a. Better than Kyoto: climate stability bonds Economic Affairs, 22, 48-52. 22. Horesh, R., 2002b. Environmental policy bonds: Injecting market incen- tives into the achievement of society's environmental goals, OECD Paper, Paris. 23. Huppes, G., 1988. New instruments for environmental policy: a perspec- tive. International Journal of Social Economics, 15, 42-51. 24. Leipert, C., 1987. A critical appraisal of gross national product: the mea- surement of net national welfare and environmental accounting. Journal of Economic Issues, 21, 357-373. 25. Leipert, C., 1989. National income and economic growth: the conceptual side of defensive expenditures. Journal of Economic Issues, 23, 843-856. 26. Montgomery, D., 1972. Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economic Theory, 5, 395-418. 27. Perrings, C., 1987. Economy and Environment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 28. Perrings, C., 1989. Environmental bonds and environmental research in innovative activities, Ecological Economics, 1, 95-110. 29. Requate, T., 2005. Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instru- ments: a survey. Ecological Economics, 54, 175-195. 30. Utkin, T., 1974. Sliding modes and their application in variable structure systems, Mir Publishers, Moscow. 31. Weibull, J.W., 1995. Evolutionary game theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/36597 |