Attema, Arthur and Brouwer, Werner (2012): Deriving time discounting correction factors for TTO tariffs.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_37002.pdf Download (159kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The Time Tradeoff (TTO) method is a popular method for valuing health state utilities and is frequently used in economic evaluations. However, this method produces utilities that are distorted by several biases. One important bias entails the failure to incorporate time discounting. This paper aims to measure time discounting for health outcomes in a sample representative for the general population. In particular, we estimate TTO scores alongside time discounting in order to derive a set of correction factors that can be employed to correct raw TTO scores for the downward bias caused by time discounting. We find substantial positive correction factors, which are increasing with the severity of the health state. Furthermore, higher discounting is found when using more severe health states in the discounting elicitation task. More research is needed to further develop discount rate elicitation procedures and test their validity, especially in general public samples. Moreover, future research should investigate the correction of TTO score for other biases as well, such as loss aversion, and to develop a criterion to test the external validity of TTO scores.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Deriving time discounting correction factors for TTO tariffs |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Discounting; QALY model; Time Tradeoff; Utility Measurement |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D90 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I10 - General |
Item ID: | 37002 |
Depositing User: | Arthur Attema |
Date Deposited: | 29 Feb 2012 13:42 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 20:19 |
References: | Abellán-Perpinán JM, Bleichrodt H, Pinto-Prades JL. 2009. The predictive validity of prospect theory versus expected utility in health utility measurement. Journal of Health Economics 28(6) : 1039-1047. Abellán-Perpinán JM, Pinto JL, Méndez-Martinez I, Badia-Llach X. 2006. Towards a better QALY model. Health Economics 15(7) : 665-676. Attema AE, Brouwer WBF. 2008. Can we fix it? Yes we can! But what? A new test of procedural invariance in TTO-measurement. Health Economics 17(7) : 877-885. Attema AE, Brouwer WBF. 2009. The correction of TTO-scores for utility curvature using a risk-free utility elicitation method. Journal of Health Economics 28(1) : 234-243. Attema AE, Brouwer WBF. 2010. The value of correcting values: Influence and importance of correcting TTO scores for time preference. Value in Health 13(8) : 879-884. Attema AE, Brouwer WBF. 2012a. Constantly Proving The Opposite? A test of CPTO using a broad horizon and correcting for discounting. Quality of Life Research 21(1) : 25-34. Attema AE, Brouwer WBF. 2012b. In search of a preferred preference elicitation method: A test of the internal consistency of choice and matching procedures. Working Paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Available from http://www.bmg.eur.nl/personal/attema/PrefRev_2012.pdf. Attema AE, Bleichrodt H, Wakker PP. forthcoming b. A direct method for measuring discounting and QALYs more easily and reliably. Medical Decision Making. Attema AE, Versteegh MM, Oppe M, Brouwer WBF, Stolk EA. forthcoming a. Lead time TTO: Leading to better health state valuations? Health Economics. Bleichrodt H. 2001. Probability Weighting in Choice under Risk: An Empirical Test. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23(2) : 185-198. Bleichrodt H. 2002. A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities. Health Economics 11(5) : 447-456. Bleichrodt H, Abellan-Perpiñan JM, Pinto-Prades JL, Mendez-Martinez I. 2007. Resolving Inconsistencies in Utility Measurement Under Risk: Tests of Generalizations of Expected Utility. Management Science 53(3) : 469-482. Bleichrodt H, Johannesson M. 1997. Standard gamble, time trade-off and rating scale: Experimental results on the ranking properties of QALYs. Journal of Health Economics 16(2) : 155-175. Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL. 2000. A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis. Management Science 46(11) : 1485-1496. Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL. 2002. Loss aversion and scale compatibility in two-attribute trade-offs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 46(3) : 315-337. Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL. 2005. The validity of QALYs under non-expected utility. The Economic Journal 115(503) : 533-550. Bleichrodt H, van Rijn J, Johannesson M. 1999. Probability weighting and utility curvature in QALY-based decision making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 43(2) : 238-260. Bostic R, Herrnstein RJ, Luce RD. 1990. The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 13(2) : 193-212. Cairns J. 1992. Health, wealth and time preference. Project Appraisal 7(1) : 31-40. Chapman GB. 1996. Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 22(3) : 771-791. Chapman GB, Elstein AS. 1995. Valuing the future: temporal discounting of health and money. Medical Decision Making 15(4) : 373-386. Dave C, Eckel C, Johnson C, Rojas C. 2010. Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 41(3) : 219-243. Dolan P. 2000. The measurement of health-related quality of life for use in resource allocation decisions in health care. In: Culyer AJ and Newhouse JP, eds, Handbook of Health Economics. North Holland: Elsevier, pp. 1723-1760. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. 1996. The time trade-off method: Results from a general population study. Health Economics 5(2) : 141-154. Gravelle H, Brouwer W, Niessen L, Postma M, Rutten F. 2007. Discounting in Economic Evaluations: Stepping forward Towards Optimal Decision Rules. Health Economics 16 3 307-317. Gudex C, Dolan P, Kind P, Williams A. 1996. Health State Valuations from the General Public Using the Visual Analogue Scale. Quality of Life Research 5(6) : pp. 521-531. Hey JJD, Morone A, Schmidt U. 2009. Noise and bias in eliciting preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 39(3) : 213-235. Johannesson M, Pliskin JS, Weinstein MC. 1994. A note on QALYs, time tradeoff, and discounting. Medical Decision Making 14(2) : 188-193. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47(2) : 263-291. Lamers LM, McDonnell J, Stalmeier PFM, Krabbe PFM, Busschbach JJV. 2006. The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Economics 15(10) : 1121-1132. Llewellyn-Thomas H, Sutherland HJ, Tibshirani R, Ciampi A, Till JE, Boyd NF. 1982. The measurement of patients' values in medicine. Medical Decision Making 2(4) : 449-462. MacKeigan LD, Gafni A, O'Brien BJ. 2003. Double discounting of QALYs. Health Economics 12(2) : 165-169. Martin AJ, Glasziou PP, Simes RJ, Lumley T. 2000. A comparison of standard gamble, time trade-off, and adjusted time trade-off scores. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 16(1) : 137-147. McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC, Tversky A. 1982. On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies. New England Journal of Medicine 306(21) : 1259-1262. Miyamoto J, Eraker SA. 1985. Parameter estimates for a QALY utility model. Medical Decision Making 5(2) : 191-213. Parkin D, Devlin N. 2006. Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost-utility analysis? Health Economics 15(7) : 653-664. Robinson A, Dolan P, Williams A. 1997. Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: what lies behind the numbers? Social Science & Medicine 45(8) : 1289-1297. Rutten-van Molken MPMH, Bakker CH, Van Doorslaer EKA, van der Linden S. 1995. Methodological Issues of Patient Utility Measurement: Experience from Two Clinical Trials. Medical Care 33(9) : 922-937. Stalmeier PF, Bezembinder TG. 1999. The discrepancy between risky and riskless utilities: a matter of framing? Medical Decision Making 19(4) : 435-447. Stalmeier PF, Bezembinder TG, Unic IJ. 1996. Proportional heuristics in time tradeoff and conjoint measurement. Medical Decision Making 16(1) : 36-44. Starmer C. 2000. Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature 38(2) : 332-382. Stiggelbout AM, Kiebert GM, Kievit J, Leer JW, Stoter G, de Haes JC. 1994. Utility assessment in cancer patients: adjustment of time tradeoff scores for the utility of life years and comparison with standard gamble scores. Medical Decision Making 14(1) : 82-90. Torrance GW. 1986. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics 5(1) : 1-30. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1991. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4) : 1039-1061. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1992. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(4) : 297-323. van der Pol M, Cairns J. 2001. Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments. Social Science & Medicine 52(9) : 1459-1470. van der Pol M, Cairns J. 2002. A comparison of the discounted utility model and hyperbolic discounting models in the case of social and private intertemporal preferences for health. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 49(1) : 79-96. van der Pol M, Cairns J. 2008. Comparison of two methods of eliciting time preference for future health states. Social Science & Medicine 67(5) : 883-889. van der Pol M, Roux L. 2005. Time preference bias in time trade-off. European Journal of Health Economics 6(2) : 107-111. Wakker P, Deneffe D. 1996. Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities When Probabilities Are Distorted or Unknown. Management Science 42(8) : 1131-1150. Wakker P, Stiggelbout A. 1995. Explaining Distortions in Utility Elicitation through the Rank-dependent Model for Risky Choices. Medical Decision Making 15(2) : 180-186. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/37002 |