Das, Gouranga and Powell, Alan A. L. (2000): Absorption Capacity, Structural Similarity and Embodied Technology Spillovers in A ‘Macro’ Model: An Implementation within a CGE Framework. Published in: The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, Seoul National University. , Vol. 16, No. 1 (1 August 2002): pp. 111-132.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_37258.pdf Download (254kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper, all technology transfers are embodied in trade flows within a three-region, one-traded-commodity version of the GTAP model. Exogenous Hicks-Neutral technical progress in one region can have uneven impacts on productivity elsewhere. Why? Destination regions’ ability to harness new technology depends on their absorptive capacity and the structural congruence of the source and destination. Together with trade volume, these two factors determine the recipient’s spillover coefficient (which measures its success in capturing foreign technology). Armington competition between the outputs of the three economies and shifts in their terms of trade loom large in the general equilibrium adjustment.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Absorption Capacity, Structural Similarity and Embodied Technology Spillovers in A ‘Macro’ Model: An Implementation within a CGE Framework |
English Title: | Absorption Capacity, Structural Similarity and Embodied Technology Spillovers in A ‘Macro’ Model: An Implementation within a CGE Framework |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Absorption Capacity, Capture Parameter, Trade, Technology Spillover, and CGE |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D58 - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights |
Item ID: | 37258 |
Depositing User: | Gouranga Gopal Das |
Date Deposited: | 08 Apr 2012 16:05 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 15:36 |
References: | Armington, P. (1969) “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production, IMF Staff Papers, No. 16, pp. 179-201. Barro, Robert J. and Xavier Sala-I-Martin (1995), Economic Growth, New York: McGraw-Hill. Coe, D. T. and Helpman, E. (1995), “International R&D Spillovers”, European Economic Review, No.39, pp. 859-887. Coe, D. T. , Helpman, E. and Hoffmaister, A.W. (1997), “North-South R&D Spillovers”, The Economic Journal, No. 107, pp.134-149. Cohen, Wesley, and Daniel Levinthal. (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, No. 35, pp. 128-52. Connolly, Michelle P. (1997) “Technology, Trade and Growth: Some Empirical Findings”, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Research Paper, No. 9727 (September), pp.1-27. Eaton, J., and S. Kortum (1996a) “Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD”, Journal of International Economics, No. 40, pp. 251-278. ______(1996b) “International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement”, Boston University and NBER, Working Paper, pp. 1-56. ______(1994) “International Patenting and Technology Diffusion”, NBER, Working Paper, No. 4931 (September), pp.1-42. Edwards, Sebastian (1997) “Openness, Productivity and Growth: What do We Really Know?”, National Bureau of Economic Research (Cambridge, MA), Working Paper, No. 5978 (March), pp.1-20+Appendix. Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman (1991a) “Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy”, MIT Press, Cambridge. ____________ (1991b) “Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth”, Review of Economic Studies, No. 58, pp. 43-61. Hall, Robert E. and Charles I. Jones (1998) “Why do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others?”, Working Paper, Stanford University, Version 4 (March). Harrison, W. Jill and K.R. Pearson (1996) “Computing Solutions for Large General Equilibrium Models Using GEMPACK”, Computational Economics, Vol. 9, pp.83-127. Hayami, Y and V.W. Ruttan (1985) Agricultural Development: An International Perspective, Baltimore and London,: The John Hopkins University Press. Hertel, Thomas W. (ed.) (1997) Global trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications (New York and Cambridge: Cambridge Ujniversity Press). _________ and Marinos E.Tsigas (1997) “Structure of the Standard GTAP mModel”, Chapter 2 in Hertel (ed.) cited above. Horridge, J. Mark (1997) “DAGG Guide”, Mimeograph, Centre of Policy Studies, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne. Jones, C. I. (1995) “R&D-based Models of Economic Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, No. 103, pp. 759-784. Keller, Wolfgang (1997) “Trade and the Transmission of Technology”, National Bureau of Economic Research (Cambridge, MA),Working Paper, No. 6113 (July), pp. 1-33+Appendix. __________(1997) “Absorptive Capacity: On the Creation and Acquisition of Technology in Development”, Journal of Development Economics, No. 49, pp. 199-227. McDougall, R. A. (1993) “Two Small Extensions to SALTER”, Salter Working Paper, No. 12, Industry Commission, Canberra. Meijl, Hans van and Frank van Tongeren (1997) “Endogenous International Technology Spillovers and Biased Technical Change in Agriculture”, Draft Version, Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI-DLO), (April), pp. 1-40. Nelson, Richard R. (1990) “On Technological Capabilities and their Acquisition”, in R.E. Evenson and G. Ranis eds. Science and Technology, Lessons for Development Policy, Westview Special Studies in Science, Technology, and Public Policy. Padoan, Pier C. (1996) “Trade and the Accumulation and Diffusion of Knowledge”, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1679 (November), World Bank, International Economics Department, International Trade Division, Washington, D.C. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/37258 |