Saumitra, Bhaduri and Sunanda, Rathi (2012): Bank firm nexus and its impact on firm performance: an Indian case study.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_38000.pdf Download (437kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper examines the role of banking relationships on firm performance for a sample of Indian manufacturing firms. The two variables used to portray banking relationships are: the extent of bank borrowing and the number of banking relationships maintained by a firm. Analysis suggests that while the extent of bank borrowing has a negative impact on firm performance, the multiple banking relationships maintained by a firm positively enhances firm performance. In addition, firm performance plays an important role in influencing bank borrowing and the number banking relationships a firm maintains. While banking relationships are positively impacted by firm performance, results suggest nonlinearity between bank financing and firm performance, suggesting the possibility of a potential debt overhang concern. This implies that firms with low growth opportunities tend to borrow more from banks due to lack of other opportunities to finance their investments. However, firms beyond a certain threshold of profitability tend to employ lesser debt to finance their investments in order to prevent the wealth transfer from shareholders to creditors.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Bank firm nexus and its impact on firm performance: an Indian case study |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Bank Firm Realationship India |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy |
Item ID: | 38000 |
Depositing User: | Saumitra Bhaduri |
Date Deposited: | 11 Apr 2012 13:15 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 06:58 |
References: | Agarwal, R. and Elston, J. A. (2001), ‘Bank-firm relationships, financing and firm performance in Germany’, Economics Letters 72, 225–232. Ahn, S., and W. Choi. (2009), ‘The Role of Bank Monitoring in Corporate Governance: Evidence from Borrowers’ Earnings Management Behavior.’ Journal of Banking and Finance 33, 425 – 434. Bolton, Patrick & Scharfstein, David S, (1996) ‘Optimal Debt Structure and the Number of Creditors,’ Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press 104, 1-25. Bris, A., Koskinen, Y. and Nilsson, M. (2006), ‘The real effects of the euro: evidence from corporate investments’, Review of Finance 10, 1–37. Cao, W., Chen, J. and Chi, J. (2010), ‘Bank firm relationship and firm performance under a state-owned bank system: Evidence from China’ Banks and Bank Systems, 5, 68-79. Castelli, A., Dwyer, G. and Hasan, I., (2006), ‘Bank Relationships and Small Firms’ Financial Performance’ Working Paper 2006-05, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Claessens, S., Dasgupta, S., and Glen, J. (1995), ‘The cross-section of stock returns: Evidence from emerging markets’ Emerging Markets Quarterly 2, 4-13. Cull, R. and L.C. Xu, (2000), ‘Bureaucrats, state banks, and the efficiency of credit allocation: The experience of Chinese state-owned enterprises’, Journal of Comparative Economics 28, 1-41. Degryse, H. and Ongena, S. (2001), ‘Bank relationships and firm profitability’, Financial Management 30, 9–34. Detragiache, E., Garella, P. and Guiso, L. (2000), ‘Multiple versus single banking relationships: Theory and evidence’, Journal of Finance 55, 1133–1161. Diamond, D.W. (1984), ‘Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring’ The Review of Economic Studies 51, 393-414 Diamond, D.W., (1991), ‘Monitoring and reputation: the choice between bank loans and directly placed debt’, Journal of Political Economy 99, 689-721. Fama, E. (1985), ‘What’s different about banks?’ Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 29-39. Fok, C. W., Chang, YC and WT Lee, (2004) ‘Bank relationships and their effects on firms performance around the Asian financial crises: evidence from Taiwan, Financial Management’, Summer 2004, 89-112. Foglia, A., S. Laviola and P. M. Reedtz (1998), ‘Multiple Banking Relationships and the Fragility of Corporate Borrowers’, Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 1441-1456. Garcia-Marco T. and Ocana C (1999), ‘The Effect of Bank Monitoring on the Investment Behavior of Spanish Firms’ Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 1579-1603. Ghosh, S. (2007), ‘Leverage, managerial monitoring and firm valuation: A simultaneous equation approach’ Research in Economics 61, 84-98. Gorton, G. and F. Schmid (1998), ‘Universal Banking and the Performance of German Firms,’ Journal of Financial Economics 58, 29-80. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A. and Sharfstein, D. (1990), ‘The role of banks in reducing the costs of financial distress in Japan’, Journal of Financial Economics 27, 67–88 Houston, J., and C. M. James (1996) ‘Bank information monopolies and the mix of private and public debt choices’ Journal of Finance 51, 1863–1889. Jensen, M.C. (1986), ‘Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers’ AEA Papers and Proceedings 76, 323-29. Johnson, S.A. (1997), ‘An empirical analysis of the determinants of corporate debt ownership structure’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 32, 47-69. Ogawa, K., E. Sterken and I. Tokutsu (2007), ‘Why Do Japanese Firms Prefer Multiple Bank Relations? Some Evidence from Firm-level Data’, Economic Systems 31, 49-70. Petersen, M.A., and R.G. Rajan, (1994), ‘The benefit of firm-creditor relationships: evidence from small business data’, Journal of Finance 49, 3-37. Pinkowitz, L. and Williamson, R. (2001), ‘Bank Power and cash holdings: evidence from Japan’, Review of Financial Studies 14, 1059–1082. Fama, E.F. (1985), ‘What’s different about banks?’, Journal of Monetary Economics 15 5-29. Rajan, R. (1992), ‘Insiders and outsiders: the choice between relationship and arm’s length debt’, Journal of Finance 47, 1367–1400. Ross Levine, (2004) ‘Finance and Growth: Theory and Evidence,’ NBER Working Papers 10766, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Santos, João A.C., and Adrienne S. Rumble (2006), ‘The American keiretsu and universal banks: Investing,voting, and sitting on non-financials’ corporate boards’, Journal of Financial Economics 80, 419–54. Sharpe, S.A. (1990), ‘Asymmetric information, bank lending and implicit contracts: a stylized model of customer relationships’, Journal of Finance, 45, 1069-1087. Stiglitz, J & Weiss, A, 1983. ‘Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Markets with Asymmetric Information: Reply [The Theory of 'Screening,' Education, and the Distribution of Income],’ The American Economic Review 73, 246-249. Tian, L., 2004, ‘Debt Governance, Soft Budget Constraints, and Performance of China’s Public Listed Companies’, China Economic Quarterly, 3-Supp, 15-26. Von Rheinbaben, J. and M. Ruckes (2004), ‘The number and the closeness of bank relationships’, Journal of Banking and Finance 28, 1597 – 1615. Von Thadden, Ernst-Ludwig. (1992), ‘The Commitment of Finance, Duplicated Monitoring and the Investment Horizon’, ESF-CEPR Working Paper Series in Financial Markets No. 27. Weinstein, D. and Yafeh, Y. (1998), ‘On the cost of a bank centered financial system: Evidence the changing main bank relations in Japan’, Journal of Finance 53, 635–672. Yosha, O. (1995), ‘Information disclosure costs and the choice of financing source’. J. Financial Intermediation 4, 3–20. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/38000 |