Bell, William and Foster, John (2012): Feed-in tariffs for promoting solar PV: progressing from dynamic to allocative efficiency.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_38861.pdf Download (357kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The International Energy Association has observed that nearly all countries now offer or are planning feed-in tariffs (FiTs) for solar PV but debate has shifted from ‘if or how to implement a FiT’ to ‘how to move to a self-sustaining market post FiT’. The aim of this paper is to explain how a sustainable FiT can be designed for residential solar PV installations, focusing on the case of ‘solar rich’ Australia. Solar PV is approaching price parity at the retail level where the electricity price charged includes both transmission and distribution costs, in addition to the wholesale price. So the economic rationale for paying a FiT premium above market rates to achieve dynamic efficiency is no longer warranted. Socially, FiTs can be a problem because they tend to exacerbate social inequality by providing a transfer of wealth from poorer to richer households. Environmentally, FiTs can also fall short of their full potential to cut emissions if they lack ‘time of day’ price signals that reflect movements in the wholesale price.
In this paper, we provide a framework in which a sustainable FiT can be designed that positively addresses all three areas of concern: social, environmental and economic. This framework identifies the market failures that exist in the residential solar PV electricity market, which include exacerbating inequity, poorly targeting myopic investment behaviour, inadequate transmission and distribution investment deferment price signals and inappropriate infant industry assistance. We argue that these market failures require addressing before the market can operate in an allocatively efficient manner.
The sustainable FiT that we propose would lead to improvements in environmental, social and economic factors. The resultant transmission and distribution investment deferment would meet both environmental and economic objectives. Directly providing finance for solar PV installations would address both social equity and investment myopia. We argue that introducing appropriate pricing signals for solar PV installations via would be in the ongoing interest of all stakeholders. It is time to progress from FiTs focused on dynamics efficiency to a sustainable FiT that emphasises allocative efficiency as an explicit goal.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Feed-in tariffs for promoting solar PV: progressing from dynamic to allocative efficiency |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Feed-in tariffs; FiT; solar PV; residential solar PV; reverse auction FiT; parity; Levelised cost of energy; LCOE; Diffusion of innovations; dynamic efficiency; allocative efficiency; Sustainable; Social progress; Environmental protection; Social inequity; DUOS; TUOS; smart meters |
Subjects: | R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R22 - Other Demand O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L94 - Electric Utilities R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location > R38 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 38861 |
Depositing User: | Dr William Paul Bell |
Date Deposited: | 18 May 2012 12:42 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 16:25 |
References: | AEMC 2009, Review of energy market frameworks in light of climate change policies: final report, Australian Energy Market Commission, Sydney, viewed Sep 2009, <http://www.aemc.gov.au/Market-Reviews/Completed/Review-of-Energy-Market-Frameworks-in-light-of-Climate-Change-Policies.html>. —— 2011, Transmission Frameworks Review, First Interim Report, Australian Energy Market Commission, Sydney. —— 2012, Power of choice - giving consumers options in the way they use electricity, Australian Energy Market Commission, Sydney. Alberth, S 2008, 'Forecasting technology costs via the experience curve - Myth or magic?', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 75, pp. 952-83. APVA 2011a, Modelling of PV & Electricity Prices in the Australian Commercial Sector, 2011, The Australian PV Association. —— 2011b, Modelling of PV & Electricity Prices in the Australian Residential Sector, 2011, The Australian PV Association. Corbell, S 2011, 'Large scale solar auction legislation ready to go', Ministerial Media Statements, viewed 16 Nov 2011, <http://www.chiefminister.act.gov.au/media.php?v=11125&m=53>. Couture, T & Gagnon, Y 2010, 'An analysis of feed-intariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment', Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 955-65. Daley, J & Edis, T 2010, Markets to Reduce Pollution: Cheaper than Expected, Grattan Institute, Melbourne. DCCEE 2011, Clean Energy Bill 2011, Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency. DSIRE 2012, 'Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency', <Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.. Ellerman, AD & Joskow, PL 2008, The European Union’s Emissions Trading System in perspective, Massachusett Institute of Technology. EY 2011, Rationale and drivers for DSP in the electricity market – demand and supply of electricity, Ernest & Young report to the AEMC on the review: Power of choice – giving consumers options in the way they use electricity. Farrell, J 2011, Demoncratizing the electricity grid, Institute for Local Self-Reliance, viewed 22 June 2011, <http://energyselfreliantstates.org/content/democratizing-electricity-system>. Faruqui, A, Sergici, S & Sharif, A 2010, 'The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption—A survey of the experimental evidence', Energy, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1598-608. Foster, J, Wagner, L, Wild, P, Bell, WP, Zhao, J & Froome, C 2011, Market and economic modelling of the impact of distributed generation, Energy Economics and Management Group, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Futura 2011, Investigation of existing and plausible future demand side participation in the electricity market, Report to the AEMC on the review: Power of choice – giving consumers options in the way they use electricity. Garnaut, R 2008, The Garnaut climate change review - final report, Commonwealth of Australia. —— 2011, Garnaut Climate Change Review – Update 2011 Update Paper eight: Transforming the electricity sector, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. Gipe, P 2011, 'Bio: Paul Gipe', Renewable Energy World, viewed 24 September 2011, <http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/u/paul-gipe-54022>. IEA 2011, Trends in photovoltalic applications: Survey report of selected IEA countires between 1992 and 2010, International Energy Agency. IUCN 2006, The Future of Sustainability: Re-thinking Environment and Development in the Twenty-first Century, ed. WM Adams, International Union for Conservation of Nature, <http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_future_of_sustanability.pdf>. Lesser, JA & Su, X 2008, 'Design of an economically efficient feed-in tariff structure for renewable energy development', Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 981-90. Lewis, B 2011, 'EU parliament set to call for carbon market intervention', Climate Spectator, <http://www.climatespectator.com.au/news/eu-parliament-set-call-carbon-market-intervention>. MEI 2012, 'The Merit Order Effect', Journal of Energy Policy, viewed 30 Mar 2012, <http://energy.unimelb.edu.au/index.php?mact=News,cntnt01,detail,0&cntnt01articleid=112&cntnt01returnid=22>. Morris, N & Johnston, W 2011, Review of the Australian solar PV industry 2011, Clean Energy Council. Nelson, T, Simshauser, P & Kelley, S 2011, 'Australian Residential Solar Feed-in Tariffs: Industry Stimulus or Regressive form of Taxation?', Economic Analysis & Policy, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 113-29. Nemet, GF 2006, 'Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics', Energy Policy, vol. 34, no. 17, pp. 3218-32. O'Rourke, S 2007, 'Solar PV Industry outlook', Solid State Technology's WaferNEWS, viewed 23 Apr 2012, <http://newsletters.pennnet.com/semiweekly/10183121.html>. Origin Energy 2007, 'Response to the National Framework for Energy Efficiency – Stage 2 – Consultation Paper ', viewed 28 Dec 2011, <http://www.ret.gov.au/Documents/mce/energy-eff/nfee/_documents/e2wg_nfee_stag26.pdf>. Pierce, J 2011, 'Presentation to the Maddocks Energy Lunch', in Maddocks Energy Lunch 2011, 27 October, Sydney PwC 2011, Investigation of the efficient operation of price signals in the NEM, PricewaterhouseCoopers report to the AEMC on the review: Power of choice – giving consumers options in the way they use electricity. REN21 2011, Renewables 2011 Gloabl Status Report, REN21 Secretariat, Paris. Saunders, RW, Gross, RJK & Wade, J 2012, 'Can premium tariffs for micro-generation and small scale renewable heat help the fuel poor, and if so, how? Case studies of innovative finance for community energy schemes in the UK', Energy Policy, vol. 42, pp. 78-88. Smith, MH & Hargroves, K 2007, 'Smart approaches to electricity use', ECOS, vol. 135, pp. 12-3. Solangi, KH, Islam, MR, Saidur, R, Rahim, NA & Fayaz, H 2011, 'A review on global solar energy policy', Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 15, pp. 2149-63. Stebbins, C 2011, 'Is the US farm boom built on an ethanol bubble?', viewed 21 Nov 2011, <http://www.climatespectator.com.au/commentary/us-farm-boom-built-ethanol-bubble>. Stock, R 2011, 'Carbon credits pricing crashes and burns', Sunday Star Times, viewed 4 Dec 2011, <http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/6081834/Carbon-credits-pricing-crashes-and-burns>. TI 2011, 'Corruption perception index', viewed 6 Dec 2011, <http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2011/in_detail/>. Timilsina, GR, Kurdgelashvili, L & Narbel, PA 2012, 'Solar energy: Markets, economics and policies', Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 16, pp. 449-65. Watt, M 2011, 'Solar same price as grid electricity', Australian Broadcasting Corporation, viewed 7 September 2011, <http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2011/s3312340.htm>. WEC 2010, Evaluation of residential smart meter policies, World Energy Council. Wild, P, Bell, WP & Foster, J 2012, The Impact of Carbon Pricing on Wholesale Electricity Prices, Carbon Pass-Through Rates and Retail Electricity Tariffs in Australia, Working Paper 5/2012, Energy Economics and Management Group, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Williams, C 2011, 'Why Pure Play Solar Installers Are Losing Ground in the Commercial Solar Space ', Renewable Energy World, viewed 28 Sep 2011, <http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2011/09/why-pure-play-solar-installers-are-losing-ground-in-the-commercial-solar-space>. Wong, P 2008, 'Progress on national approach to renewable energy', Ministerial Media Statements, viewed 6 Mar 2008, <http://www.climatechange.gov.au/~/media/Files/minister/previous%20minister/wong/2008/Media%20Releases/March/mr20080306.pdf>. Yates, A & Mendis, P 2009, Climate change adaptation for the electricity sector : handbook, Australian Security Research Centre. Zahedi, A 2009, 'Development of an economical model to determine an appropriate feed-in tariff for grid-connected solar PV electricity in all states of Australia', Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 871-8. —— 2010, 'A review on feed-in tariff in Australia, what it is now and what it should be', Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 3252-5. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/38861 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Feed-in tariffs for promoting solar PV: progressing from dynamic to allocative efficiency. (deposited 18 May 2012 12:42)
[Currently Displayed]
-
Feed-in tariffs for promoting solar PV: progressing from dynamic to allocative efficiency. (deposited 18 Dec 2012 05:25)
- Feed-in tariffs for promoting solar PV: progressing from dynamic to allocative efficiency. (deposited 14 Apr 2013 12:55)
-
Feed-in tariffs for promoting solar PV: progressing from dynamic to allocative efficiency. (deposited 18 Dec 2012 05:25)