Fosgerau, Mogens and Pilegaard, Ninette (2007): Cost-benefit rules for transport projects when labor supply is endogenous and taxes are distortionary.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_3902.pdf Download (247kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We embed a stylized traffic model within a general equilibrium model in which labor supply is endogenous and income taxes are distortionary. Within this framework we derive simple rules for performing a cost-benefit analysis that can be applied knowing only the output of the traffic model and a factor that accounts for the labor market distortion in a consistent manner. Thus the rules that we derive should be applicable in the large number of cost-benefit analyses that are performed based on the output of traffic models. Such analyses are routinely performed and guide the allocation of a large share of public investment in many countries of the world as well as the assessment of policies such as road user charging. We find that the rules for leisure transport are exactly the same as in a conventional CBA that includes the marginal cost of public funds. For business travel and commuting we find new rules as a result of the assumption that transport costs have the same distortionary effect as income taxes.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | Technical University of Denmark |
Original Title: | Cost-benefit rules for transport projects when labor supply is endogenous and taxes are distortionary |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Cost-benefit; Transport; General Equilibrium |
Subjects: | R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R42 - Government and Private Investment Analysis ; Road Maintenance ; Transportation Planning H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H40 - General |
Item ID: | 3902 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Mogens Fosgerau |
Date Deposited: | 08 Jul 2007 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 04:36 |
References: | Ben-Akiva, M., Bowman, J. L. and Gopinath, D. (1996) Travel demand model system for the information era Transportation 23(3), 241-266. DeSerpa, A. C. (1971) A Theory of the Economics of Time. The Economic Journal 81, 828-845. Fosgerau, M. (2001) PETRA - an Activity-based Approach to Travel Demand Analysis in L.-G. Mattson and L. Lundquist (eds), National Transport Models Advances in Spatial Science Springer Verlag. Goulder, L. H. (1995) Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend: A Reader's Guide International Tax and Public Finance 2, 157-183. Kleven, H. J. and Kreiner, C. T. (2006) The marginal cost of public funds: Hours of work versus labor force participation Journal of Public Economics 90(10-11), 1955-1973. Office of Management and Budget (1992) Transmittal Memo No. 64. Parry, I. W. and Bento, A. (2001) Revenue Recycling and the Welfare Effects of Road Pricing Scandinavian Journal of Economics 103(4), 645-671. Pilegaard, N. and Fosgerau, M. (2007) Cost-benefit analysis of a transport improvement in the case of search unemployment. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy Forthcoming. Sandmo, A. (1998) Redistribution and the marginal cost of public funds. Journal of Public Economics 70(3), 365-382. SIKA (2000) Summary of ASEK estimates SIKA Stockholm. Trafikministeriet (2003) Manual for samfundskonomisk analyse, Denmark. Venables, A. J. (2007) Evaluating urban transport improvements: cost-benefit analysis in the presence of agglomeration and income taxation. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (Forthcoming). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/3902 |