De Spiegelaere, Stan and Van Gyes, Guy and Vandekerckhove, Sem and Van Hootegem, Geert (2012): Job design and innovative work behavior enabling innovation through active or low-strain jobs?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_41105.pdf Download (827kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Promoting the innovative potential of employees is a main challenge for HR professionals. Previous studies already stressed the role of job design for employee innovativeness. Building on the work of Karasek & Theorell (1990), we focus on the relation between job design, work engagement and innovative work behaviour (IWB). The results show that job control is positively related to both IWB and work engagement, job demands are negatively related to work engagement, yet their relation to IWB is more ambiguous. Significant interaction effects between job demands and job control variables in both the relation with work engagement and IWB are found, yet their nature differs significantly. We find that active jobs (high control and high demands) are related to lower levels of IWB in comparison to low-strain jobs (high control, low demands), which has major managerial consequences.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Job design and innovative work behavior enabling innovation through active or low-strain jobs? |
English Title: | Job Design and Innovative Work Behavior Enabling Innovation through Active or Low-strain Jobs? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Innovative Work Behavior, Job Design, Time Pressure, Work Engagement, Employee Innovation |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D29 - Other D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles |
Item ID: | 41105 |
Depositing User: | Stan De Spiegelaere |
Date Deposited: | 07 Sep 2012 16:58 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 10:03 |
References: | Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London: Sage Publications. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. Basu, R., & Green, S. G. (1997). Leader-Member Exchange and Transformational Leadership: An Empirical Examination of Innovative Behaviors in Leader-Member Dyads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(6), 477–499. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00643.x Byron, K., Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D. (2010). The Relationship Between Stressors and Creativity: A Meta-Analysis Examining Competing Theoretical Models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 201–212. Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. (2009). Trust, Connectivity, and Thriving: Implications for Innovative Behaviors at Work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169–191. de Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 Fritz, C., & Sonnentag, S. (2009). Antecedents of Day-Level Proactive Behavior: A Look at Job Stressors and Positive Affect During the Workday†. Journal of Management, 35(1), 94 –111. doi:10.1177/0149206307308911 Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work Redesign. Addison-Wesley. Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90–105. doi:10.1037/a0018556 Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland: World Publishing. Holman, D., Totterdell, P., Axtell, C., Stride, C., Port, R., Svensson, R., & Zibarras, L. (2011). Job Design and the Employee Innovation Process: The Mediating Role of Learning Strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9242-5 Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. doi:10.2307/256287 Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organisations.". In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 93–131). Greenwich: J.A.I. Press. Karasek, R. (1979). Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308. doi:10.2307/2392498 Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P., & Amick, B. (1998). The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of occupational health psychology, 3(4), 322. Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy Work. Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books. Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284–296. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005660 Krause, D. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors. An empirical investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 79–102. Martín, P., Salanova, M., & Maria Peiro, J. (2007). Job demands, job resources and individual innovation at work: Going beyond Karasek’ s model? Psicothema, 19(4), 621–626. Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2010). Innovative Work Behaviour in Vocational Colleges: Understanding How and Why Innovations Are Developed. Vocations and Learning, 4(1), 63–84. doi:10.1007/s12186-010-9049-y Mortelmans, D., & Dehertogh, B. (2008). Factoranalyse. Stap in Statistiek en Onderzoek. Leuven: Acco. Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 257–279. doi:10.1002/job.376 Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634. Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (1997). “ That’s Not My Job”: Developing Flexible Employee Work Orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 899–929. Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142–150. Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 116. doi:10.1080/09585190701763982 Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1998). Following the leader in R&D: the joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 45(1), 3–10. doi:10.1109/17.658656 Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The Effects of Personal and contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go From Here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common Method Bias in Regression Models With Linear, Quadratic, and Interaction Effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456 –476. doi:10.1177/1094428109351241 Slåtten, T., & Mehmetoglu, M. (2011). What are the Drivers for Innovative Behavior in Frontline Jobs? A Study of the Hospitality Industry in Norway. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 10(3), 254–272. doi:10.1080/15332845.2011.555732 Spector, P. E. (2006). Method Variance in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232. doi:10.1177/1094428105284955 Unsworth, K., Wall, T. D., & Carter, A. (2005). Creative Requirement. Group & Organization Management, 30(5), 541 –560. doi:10.1177/1059601104267607 Van den Broeck, A., De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). Not all job demands are equal: Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the Job Demands–Resources model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(6), 735–759. doi:10.1080/13594320903223839 van Veldhoven, M., Meijman, T. F., Broersen, J. P. J., & Fortuin, R. J. (2002). Handleiding VBBA (p. 32). Amsterdam: SKB Vrangelijst Services. Witte, H. D., Verhofstadt, E., & Omey, E. (2007). Testing Karasek’s learning and strain hypotheses on young workers in their first job. Work & Stress, 21(2), 131–141. doi:10.1080/02678370701405866 Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. (2010). Innovative Behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/41105 |