Mago, Shakun and Sheremeta, Roman and Yates, Andrew (2012): Best-of-Three Contest Experiments: Strategic versus Psychological Momentum. Forthcoming in: International Journal of Industrial Organization
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_43031.pdf Download (588kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We conduct an experimental analysis of a best-of-three contest. Intermediate prizes lead to higher efforts, while increasing the role of luck (as opposed to effort) leads to lower efforts. Both intermediate prizes and luck reduce the probability of contest ending in two rounds. The patterns of players’ efforts and the probability that a contest ends in two rounds are consistent with ‘strategic momentum’, i.e., momentum generated due to strategic incentives inherent in the contest. We do not find evidence for ‘psychological momentum’, i.e., momentum which emerges when winning affects players’ confidence. Similar to previous studies of contests, we find significantly higher efforts than predicted and strong heterogeneity in effort between subjects.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Best-of-Three Contest Experiments: Strategic versus Psychological Momentum |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | best-of-three contest, experiments, strategic momentum, psychological momentum |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior |
Item ID: | 43031 |
Depositing User: | Roman Sheremeta |
Date Deposited: | 06 Dec 2012 13:39 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 13:51 |
References: | Alchian, A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 211-221. Amaldoss, W., & Rapoport, A. (2009). Excessive Expenditure in Two-Stage Contests: Theory and Experimental Evidence. In I. N. Hangen and A. S. Nilsen (Eds.), Game Theory: Strategies, Equilibria and Theorems , 241-266, Nova Science Publishers, NY. Anderson, L.R., & Freeborn, B.A. (2010). Varying the intensity of competition in a multiple prize rent seeking experiment. Public Choice, 143, 237-254. Anderson, L.R., and Stafford, S.L. (2003). An experiment analysis of rent seeking under varying competitive conditions. Public Choice, 115, 199-216. Arkes, H.R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140. Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance Theory: Progress and Problems. In R. Abelson et al., eds, Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook, Rand McNally and Co, 5-27.Baharad, E., and Nitzan, S. (2008). Contest Efforts in Light of Behavioral Considerations. Economic Journal, 118, 2047-2059. Baharad, E. & Nitzan, S. (2008). Contest Efforts in Light of Behavioural Considerations. Economic Journal, 118, 2047-2059. Baker, G., Gibbs, M., & Holmstrom, B. (1994a). The Internal Economics of the Firm: Evidence from Personnel Data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 881-919. Baker, G., Gibbs, M., & Holmstrom, B. (1994b). The Wage Policy of a Firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 921-955. Cason, T. N., Masters, W.A., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2010). Entry into Winner-Take-All and Proportional-Prize Contests: An Experimental Study. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 604-611. Cason, T.N., Sheremeta, R.M., & Zhang, J. (2012). Communication and Efficiency in Competitive Coordination Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 76, 26-43. Charness, G., & Levin, D. (2009). The Origins of the Winner’s Curse: A Laboratory Study. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 1, 207–36. Chen, Y., Katuscak, P., & Ozdenoren, E. (2012). Why Can’t a Woman Bid More Like a Man? Games and Economic Behavior, forthcoming. D’Avolio, G. (2002). The Market for Borrowing Stock. Journal of Financial Economics, 66, 271–306. Davis, D., & Reilly, R. (1998). Do too many cooks spoil the stew? An experimental Analysis of rent-seeking and the role of a strategic buyer. Public Choice, 95, 89 – 115. Dechenaux, E., Kovenock, D., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). A Survey of Experimental Research on Contests, All-Pay Auctions and Tournaments. Chapman University, ESI Working Paper. Deck, C., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). Fight or Flight? Defending Against Sequential Attacks in the Game of Siege. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56, 1069-1088. Dorsey-Palmateer, R., & Smith, G. (2004). Bowlers’ hot hands. American Statistician, 58, 38-45. Ferrall, C., & Smith, A. (1999). A sequential game model of sports championship series: theory and estimation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 704-719. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178. Fonseca, M.A. (2009). An experimental investigation of asymmetric contests. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27, 582-591. Freeman, R.B., & Gelber, A.M. (2010). Prize Structure and Information in Tournaments: Experimental Evidence. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 149–64. Friedman, D., Pommerenke, K., Lukose, R., Milam, G., & Huberman, B.A. (2010). In search for the sunk cost fallacy. Experimental Economics,10, 79-104 Fudenberg, D., Gilbert, R., Stiglitz, J., & Tirole, J. (1983). Preemption, leapfrogging and competition in patent races. European Economic Review, 22, 3-31. Ham, J.C., & Kagel, J.H. (2006). Gender Effects in Private Value Auctions. Economic Letters, 92, 375-382. Hamilton, W.D. (1970). Selfish and spiteful behavior in evolutionary model. Nature, 228, 1218-1220. Hehenkamp, B., Leininger, W., & Possajenikov, A. (2004). Evolutionary equilibrium in Tullock contests: spite and overdissipation. European Journal of Political Economy, 20, 1045-1057. Hillman, A.L. & Katz, E. (1984). Risk averse rent-seekers and the social cost of monopoly power. Economic Journal, 94, 104-110. Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. American Economic Review , 92,1644-1655. Irfanoglu, Z.B., Mago, S.D., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2013). Sequential versus Simultaneous Election Contests: An Experimental Study. Chapman University, ESI Working Paper. Jackson, D. (1993). Independent trials are a model for disaster. Applied Statistics, 42, 211-220. Kerick, S.E., Iso-Ahola, S.E. & Hatfield, B.D. (2000). Psychological momentum in target shooting: Cortical, cognitive-affective, and behavioral responses. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 22, 1-20. Kimbrough, E.O., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). Side-Payments and the Costs of Conflict. International Journal of Industrial Organization, forthcoming. Klumpp, T., & Polborn, M.K. (2006). Primaries and the New Hampshire effect. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1073-1114. Konrad, K. A., & Schlesinger, H. (1997). Risk aversion in risk seeking and rent-augmenting games. Economic Journal, 107, 1671-1683. Konrad, K.A., & Kovenock, D. (2009). Multi-battle contests. Games and Economic Behavior, 66, 256-274. Leininger, W. (2003). On evolutionarily stable behavior in contests. Economics of Governance, 4, 177-186. Mago, S.D., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). Multi-battle Contests: An Experimental Study. Chapman University, ESI Working Paper. Mago, S.D., Savikhin, A.C., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). Facing Your Opponents: Social Identification and Information Feedback in Contests. Chapman University, ESI Working Paper. Malueg, D., & Yates, A. (2005). Equilibria and comparative statics in two player contests. European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 738-752. Malueg, D., & Yates, A. (2010). Testing contest theory: evidence from best-of-three tennis matches. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 689-692. McFall, T., Knoeber, C., & Thurman, W. (2009). Contests, grand prizes, and the hot hand. Journal of Sports Economics, 10, 236-255. McKee, M. (1989). Intra-experimental income effects and risk aversion. Economic Letters, 30, 109-115. McKelvey, R. & Palfrey, T. (1995). Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 6-38. Millner, E. L. & Pratt, M. (1991). Risk Aversion and Rent-Seeking: An Extension and Some Experimental Evidence. Public Choice, 69, 81-92. Millner, E.L. & Pratt, M.D. (1989). An Experimental Investigation of Efficient Rent-Seeking. Public Choice, 62, 139-151. Mosteller, F. (1952). The world series competition. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 355-380. Nitzan, S. (1991). Collective Rent Dissipation. The Economic Journal, 101, 1522-1534. Parco J., Rapoport A., & Amaldoss W. (2005). Two-stage Contests with Budget Constraints: An Experimental Study. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49, 320-338. Potters, J., de Vries, C.G., & van Winden, F. (1998). An experimental examination of rational rent-seeking. European Journal of Political Economy, 14, 783 – 800. Price, C.R. & Sheremeta, R.M. (2011). Endowment Effects in Contests. Economics Letters, 111, 217-219. Price, C.R., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). Endowment Origin, Demographic Effects and Individual Preferences in Contests. Chapman University, ESI Working Paper. Riechmann, T. (2007). An analysis of rent-seeking games with relative-payoff maximizers. Public Choice, 133, 147-155. Savikhin, A.C. & Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). Simultaneous Decision-Making in Competitive and Cooperative Games. Economic Inquiry, forthcoming. Schmitt, P., Shupp, R. Swope, K., & Cadigan, J. (2004). Multi-period rent-seeking contests with carryover: Theory and Experimental Evidence. Economics of Governance, 10, 247-259. Sheremeta, R.M. (2010a). Expenditures and Information Disclosure in Two-Stage Political Contests. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54, 771-798. Sheremeta, R.M. (2010b). Experimental Comparison of Multi-Stage and One-Stage Contests. Games and Economic Behavior, 68, 731–747. Sheremeta, R.M. (2011). Contest Design: An Experimental Investigation. Economic Inquiry, 49, 573–590. Sheremeta, R.M. (2013). Overbidding and Heterogeneous Behavior in Contest Experiments. Chapman University, ESI Working Paper. Sheremeta, R.M., & Zhang, J. (2010). Can Groups Solve the Problem of Over-Bidding in Contests? Social Choice and Welfare, 35, 175-197. Szymanski, S. (2003). The Economic Design of Sporting Contests, Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 1137-1187. Treich, N. (2009). Risk-aversion and prudence in rent-seeking games. Public Choice, 1573-7101. Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient Rent Seeking. In James M. Buchanan, Robert D. Tollison, Gordon Tullock, (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 97-112. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130. Vallerand, R. J., Colavecchio, P. G., & Pelletier, L. G. (1988). Psychological momentum and performance inferences: a preliminary test of the antecedents-consequences psychological momentum model. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 92-108. van Dijk, F., Sonnemans, J., & van Winden, F. (2001). Incentives Systems in a Real Effort Experiment. European Economic Review, 45, 187-214. Vriend, N.J. (2000). An illustration if the essential difference between individual and social learning, and its consequences for computational analyses. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24, 1-19. Zizzo, D.J. (2002). Racing with Uncertainty: A Patent Race Experiment. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 877–902. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/43031 |