Did New Public Management Matter? An Empirical Analysis of The Outsourcing and Decentralization Effects on Public Sector Size

Alonso, Jose M. and Clifton, Judith and Díaz-Fuentes, Daniel (2011): Did New Public Management Matter? An Empirical Analysis of The Outsourcing and Decentralization Effects on Public Sector Size.

Abstract

This paper evaluates whether reforms associated with the New Public Management (NPM) doctrine led to a reduction in public sector expenditure and employees. Savings and downsizing the public sector were a major justification when the international movement of public sector reforms began in the 1980s. Since then, NPM has been the subject of extensive academic debate as to its successes and failures. However, empirical assessments of whether NPM reached its stated objectives are relatively scarce, mainly due to the difficulty of quantifying the impact of such reforms. This paper is an attempt to do this, especially looking at outsourcing and decentralization. We test a number of hypotheses related to the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector expenditure and employees through an econometric analysis using a panel data model for eighteen European Countries over the period 1980 to 2010. The results suggest a positive correlation between the degree of outsourcing in the provision of public services and government spending in the short term. On the other hand we find that decentralization tends to decrease the size of general government, particularly in the long-run.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: New Public Management, outsourcing, decentralization, public sector size
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession; H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H10 - General; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H63 - Debt ; Debt Management ; Sovereign Debt; L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L33 - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprises and Nonprofit Institutions ; Privatization ; Contracting Out

References

Ashworth, J.and Galli, E. & Padovano, F. (2006), Decentralization as a constraint to Leviathan: a panel cointegration analysis, Working paper, Italian Society of Public Economics Conference 2006. 28 Baltagi, B. (2008), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Wiley, John and Sons, Inc. Baltagi, B. & Kao, C. (2000), ‘Nonstationary panels, cointegration in panels and dynamic panels: a survey’, Advances in Econometrics 15, 7–51. Barzelay, M. (2002), New public management: Current trends and future prospects, London, Routledge, chapter Origins of the New Public Management: An international view from public administration/ political science, pp. 15–33. Beck, N. & Katz, J. (1995), ‘What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data’, American Politial Science Review 89(3), 634–647. Beckmann, J., Belke, A. & Dobnik, F. (2011), Cross-section Dependence and the Monetary Exchange Rate Model: A Panel Analysis, Discussion Paper 1119, Deutsches Institut frWirtschaftsforschung. Bel, G., Fageda, X. & Warner, M. (2010), ‘Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? a meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29(3), 553–577. Berkowitz, E. & McQuaid, K. (1988), Creating the Welfare State: The Political Economy of Twentieth Century Reform, second edn, New York: Praeger Press. Revised and Expanded. Borins, S. (1994), Government in Transition: A New Paradigm in Public Administration, Technical report, Commonwealth Association for Public Administration and Management (28 August, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Islands). Breitung, J. (2005), ‘A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data’, Econometric Reviews 24, 151–173. Brennan, G. & Buchanan, J. (1980), The Power to Tax. Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cassette, A. & Paty, S. (2010), ‘Fiscal decentralization and the size of government: a European country empirical analysis ’, Public Choice 143(1-2), 173–189. Chen, X., Lin, S. & Reed, R. (2010), ‘A Monte Carlo evaluation of the efficiency of the PCSE estimator ’, Applied Economic Letters 17(1), 7–10. Choi, I. (2001), ‘Unit root tests for panel data’, Journal of International Money and Finance 20(2), 249– 272. Christensen, T. & Laegreid, P. (2002), ‘New public management: Puzzles of democracy and the influence of citizens’, Journal of Political Philosophy 10(3), 267–295. Christensen, T. & Laegreid, P. (2007), ‘The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform’, Public Administration Review 67, 1059–1066.

Christensen, T. & Laegreid, P., eds (2001), New Public management: the transformation of ideas and practice, Aldershot, Ashgate. Clifton, J., Comin, F. &Diaz-Fuentes, D. (2003), Privatization in the European Union: Public Enterprise and Integration, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Clifton, J., Comin, F. & Diaz-Fuentes, D. (2005), ‘Empowering Europe’s Citizens? On the prospects for a Charter for Services of General Interest’, Public Management Review . Clifton, J., Comin, F. & Diaz-Fuentes, D. (2006), ‘Privatization in the European Union: Pragmatic, Ideological, Inevitable?’, Journal of European Public Policy . Clifton, J., Comin, F. & Diaz-Fuentes, D., eds (2007), Tranforming Public Enterprise in Europe and the Americas: Transnationalisation and Integration, Palgrave. Clifton, J. & Diaz-Fuentes, D. (2010), ‘Evaluating EU policies on public services: A citizens’ perspective’, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics . Coase, R. (1937), ‘The nature of the firm’, Economica 4(16), 386–405. Comin, F. & Diaz-Fuentes, D. (2004), La empresa publica en Europa, Sintesis. Costas, A. (2007), ‘De consumidor a ciudadano: el papel de la satisfaccion del ciudadano en la sostenibilidad de los mercados de servicios publicos’, Informacion Comercial Espanola 836, 33–50. Dunleavy, P. & Hood, C. (1994), ‘From old public administration to new management’, Public Money and Management 14(3), 9–16. Falleti, T. (2005), ‘A Sequential Theory of Decentralization: Latin American Cases in Comparative Perspective’, The American Political Science Review 99(3), 327–346. Ferlie, E., Pettigrew, A., Ashburner, L. & Fitzgerald, L. (1996), The New Public Management in Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Fiva, J. (2006), ‘New Evidence on the Effect of Fiscal Decentralization on the Size and Composition of Government Spending’, FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis 62(2), 250–280. Flynn, N. (2002), New public management: Current trends and future prospects, London, Routledge, chapter Explaining the New Public Management: the importance of context, pp. 57–76. Hammerschmid, G., Meyer, R. E. & et al (2007), Cultural Aspects of Public Management Reform, JAI press, chapter Public administration modernization: Common reform trends or different paths and national understandings in the EU countries, pp. 145–169. Hart, O., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1997), ‘The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prisons’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1127–1161. 30 Haynes, P. (2003), Managing complexity in the public services, Open University Press. Hood, C. (1991), ‘A public management for all seasons’, Public Administration 69(1), 3–19. Hood, C. (1995), ‘The ”New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 20, 93–109. Hood, C. (2000), The Art of the State. Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hsiao, C. (2003), Analysis of Panel Data, second edn, Cambridge Universtity Press. Jensen, P. & Stonecash, T. (2005), ‘Incentives and the efficiency of public sector-outsourcing contracts’, Journal of Economic Surveys 19(5), 767–787. Jin, J. & Zou, H. (2002), ‘How does fiscal decentralization affect aggregate, national and subnational government size?,’, Journal of Urban Economics 52, 270–293. Kao, C. (1999), ‘Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data’, Journal of Econometrics 90, 1–44. Kao, C. & Chiang, M. (2000), ‘On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data’, Advances in Econometrics 15, 179–222. Kettl, D. (2000), The global public management revolution: a report on the transformation of governance, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press. Levine, R. & Renelt, D. (1992), ‘A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions’, The American Economic Review 82(4), 942–963. Maddala, G. S. & Wu, S. (1999), ‘A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61, 631–652. Mark, N. C. & Sul, D. (2003), ‘Cointegration vector estimation by panel dols and long-run money demand’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65(5), 655–680. Minicucci, S. & Donahue, J. D. (2004), ‘A simple estimation method for aggregate government outsourcing’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(3), 489–507. Niskanen, W. (1971), Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago: Aldine Atherton. Oates, W. (1972), Fiscal Federalism, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. Oates, W. (1985), ‘Searching for Leviathan: An Empirical Analysis’, American Economic Review 75, 748–757. OECD (2009), Government at a Glance 2009, Technical report, OECD. 31 OECD (2010), Public administation after new public management, Technical report, OECD. OECD (2011), Government at a Glance 2011, Technical report, OECD. Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992), Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Addison-Wesley, Reading. Osborne, S. P. & McLaughlin, K. (2002), New public management: Current trends and future prospects, London, Routledge, chapter The New Public Management in context, pp. 7–14. O’Toole, L. & Meier, K. (2004), ‘Parkinson’s Law and the New Public Management? Contracting Determinants and Service-Quality Consequences in Public Education’, Public Administration Review 64(3), 342–352. Pedroni, P. (2000), ‘Fully modified OLS for heterogeneus cointegrated panels’, Advances in Econometrics 15, 93–130. Pedroni, P. (2004), ‘Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the ppp hypothesis’, Econometric theory 20, 597–625. Pesaran, M. & Smith, R. (1995), ‘Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels’, Journal of Econometrics 68, 79–113. Peters, G. & Savoie, D. (1996), ‘Managing Incoherence: The Coordination and Empowerment Conundrum’, Pubilc Administration Review 56(3), 281–289. Polidano, C. (1998), ‘Public sector reform in developing countries: the state of practice. introduction: new public management, old hat?’, Journal of International Development 10, 373–375. Pollitt, C. (1993), Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience, second edn, Blackwell, Oxford. Pollitt, C. (2007a), ‘The new public management: An overview of its current status’, Administratie SI Management Public 8, 110–115. Pollitt, C. (2007b), The Oxford Handbook Of Public Management, Oxford University Press, chapter Decentralization. Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2003), Evaluation in Public Sector Reform: Concepts and Practise in an international perspective, Edard Elgar, chapter Evaluating Public Management Reforms: An international perspective. Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2004), Public Management Reform: An international comparison, Oxford University Press. Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2011), Public management reform: a comparative analysis: New Public management, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 32 Pollitt, C. & Dan, S. (2011), The impacts of the new public management in europe: A metaanalysis, Working paper WP 3, COCOPS. Pollitt, C. & Summa, H. (1997), ‘Trajectories of reform: public management change in four countries’, Public Money and Management 17(1), 1–13. Prud’homme, R. (1995), ‘The dangers of decentralization’, The World Bank Research Observer 10(2), 201–220. Quiggin, J. (2002), ‘Contracting out: promise and performance’, Economic and Labour Relations Review 13(1), 88–104. Rodden, J. (2003), ‘Revising Leviathan: Fiscal Federalism and the Growth of Government’, International Organization 57, 695–729. Rodrick, D. (1998), ‘Why do more open economies have bigger governments?’, Journal of Political Economy 106, 997–1032. Rondinelli, D., Nellis, J. & Shabbir, G. (1984), Decentralization in Developing Countries: A Review of Recent Experience., Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Savas, E. (1987), Privatization. The key to better government, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House. Schmalensee, R. (1979), The Control of Natural Monopolies, Massachusetts: Lexington Books. Schneider, A. (2003), ‘Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement’, Studies in Comparative International Development 38(3), 32–56. Stegarescu, D. (2005), ‘Public sector decentralization: measurement concepts and recent international trends,’, Fiscal Studies 26(301-333). Tiebout, C. (1956), ‘A Pure Theory of Local Public Expenditures’, Journal of Political Economy 64, 416– 424. Torres, L. & Pina, V. (2004), ‘Reshaping public administration: the Spanish experience compared to the UK’, Public Administration 82(2), 445–464. Treisman, D. (2007), The architecture of government: rethinking political decentralization, New York: Cambridge University. Tullock, G. (1965), The politics of Bureaucracy, Washington DC: Public Affairs Press. Van de Walle, S. & Hammerschmid, G. (2011), Coordinating for cohesion in the public sector of the future: Cocops project background paper, Working paper WP 1, COCOPS. Vickers, J. & Yarrow, G. (1988), Privatization: An Economic Analysis, MIT press, Cambridge, Mass. 33 Wagner, M. & Hlouskova, J. (2007), The performance of panel cointegration methods: results from large scale simulation study, working paper, Institute of Advanced Studies. Warner, M. & Hefezt, A. (2008), ‘Managing Markets for Public Service: The Role of Mixed Public/ Private Delivery of City Services’, Public Administration Review 68(1), 150–161. Wegrich, K. (2009), International Handbook of Public Management Reform, Edward Elgar, chapter Public Management Reform in the United Kingdom: Great leaps, small steps, and policies as their own cause, pp. 137–154. Westerlund, J. (2003), Feasible estimation in cointegrated panels, Discussion paper, Department of Economics, University of Lund. Williamson, O. (1979), ‘Transaction cost economics: the governance of contractual relationships’, Journal of Law and Economics 22, 233–261. Williamson, O. (1989a), Handbook of Industrial Organization, New York: North Holland, chapter Transaction Costs Economics, pp. 136–184. Williamson, O. (1989b), ‘Transaction Costs Economics: How It Works; Where It Is Headed’, De Economist 146, 23–58. Williamson, O. (1999), ‘Public and Private Bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective’, Journal of Law and Economics 15(1), 306–402. Wooldridge, J. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, Massachusetts ; London : The MIT Press. Wooldridge, J. (2003), Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, second edn, Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.