Optimal policies for international recycling between developed and developing countries

Honma, Satoshi (2013): Optimal policies for international recycling between developed and developing countries.

Abstract

This paper presents a model of waste product trade between a developed and a developing country. North firms produce products that are consumed exclusively in North. After consumption, parts of them are exported from North to South. This export may be illegal. The remaining portion of the waste products are collected and recycled by firms in North. Firms in South engage exclusively only in recycling. The South government is unable to find illegal dumping of recycled waste products because of an inadequate governance capacity. Therefore, we assume that the South government subsidizes recycled material. The model addresses five scenarios: closed economy, the first best, strategic government, selfish North government and inactive South government, and benevolent North government and inactive South government. Among these scenarios, only the first best outcome needs a negative tariff for waste-product import to South. A limitation of the strategic government case is that the South government must finance the subsidy. In the selfish North government case, North benefits by avoiding collection and recycling costs by outflow of waste into South. The South environment, however, would enormously deteriorate due to the absence of a policy. If the North government is benevolent, it imposes an export tax on waste products to South to curb it.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Recycling: International trade; Strategic trade policy
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F18 - Trade and Environment; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies

References

Cassing, J. and Kuhn, T. 2003. Strategic environmental policies when waste products are tradable. Review of International Economics, 11(3): 495-511.

Copeland, B.R. 1991. International trade in waste products in the presence of illegal disposal. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 20: 143-1 62.

Fullerton, D., Kinnaman, T., 1995. Garbage, Recycling, and Illicit Burning or Dumping. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 78–91.

Fuse, M., Yamasue, E., Barbara, K.R., and Graedel, T.E. 2011. Regional development or resource preservation? A perspective from Japanese appliance exports. Ecological Economics, 70: 788-797.

Higashida, K., Jinji, N. 2006. Strategic use of recycled content standards under international duopoly. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51: 242-257.

Honma, S. and Chang, M.C. 2010. A Model for Recycling Target Policy under Imperfect Competition With and Without Cooperation Between Firms. Kyushu Sangyo University Discussion Paper, 45.

Ino, H. 2011. Optimal environmental policy for waste disposal and recycling when firms are not compliant. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62: 290-308.

Kellenberg, D. 2012. Trading wastes. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64: 68–87.

Kinnaman, T., Yokoo, H. 2011. The Environmental Consequences of Global Reuse. American Economic Review, 101: 71-76.

Koide, H. 2008. Resources Circulation Economy and Internalization of Externalities (in Japanese, Shigen Junkan Keizai to Gaibusei no Naibuka), Keiso Shobo, Tokyo.

Palmer, K., Walls, M. 1997. Optimal policies for solid waste disposal Taxes, subsidies, and standards. Journal of Public Economics, 65: 193-205.

Shinkuma, T., 2003. On the second-best policy of household’s waste recycling. Environmental and Resource Economics, 24: 77-95.

Shinkuma, T. and Managi, S. 2011. Waste and Recycling. Routledge, New York.

Walls, M., Palmer, K. 2001. Upstream pollution, downstream waste disposal, and the design of comprehensive environmental policies,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36: 94-108.