Garcia-Martinez, Jose A. (2013): The Perverse Incentive of Knowing the Truth.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_43825.pdf Download (298kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We show that the observation by a principal of the effectiveness of an expert‘s action could induce the expert to lie, damaging the principal. A career-minded expert receives a private-informative signal about the real state of the world, and then he takes an action that can match or not the real state. If a principal observes the consequences of this expert’s action, i.e., if the action matches or not the real state, this expert could disregard his valuable information damaging the principal: the expert plays the opposite action to that recommended by his signal and consequently decreases the probability of matching the real state. However, this expert could play the "recommended" action with positive probability if consequences are not observed. The previous literature has found that "transparency of consequence" can only improves the incentives of the expert to reveal his valuable information. The paradoxical behavior we have found can appear when the expert needs to signal with one action two different kinds of information, and there is a particular "trade-off" in the way of signaling; this "trade-off" can be affected in an unexpected way by the observation of the expert’s action consequences. In this paper, we present a simple model to capture this idea, and characterize the range of the parameters where that occurs.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Perverse Incentive of Knowing the Truth |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Transparency, Principal-Agent, Reputation |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games |
Item ID: | 43825 |
Depositing User: | Jose A. Garcia-Martinez |
Date Deposited: | 16 Jan 2013 13:08 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 12:15 |
References: | Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Michael Herron, and Kenneth Shotts (2001), "Leadership and pandering: a theory of executive policymaking." American Journal of Political Science, 45 (3), 532—550. Cremer, Jacques (1995), "Arm’s Length Relationships."Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 275-95. Dewatripont, Mathias, Ian Jewitt and Jean Tirole (1999), "The Economics of Career Concerns, Part I: Comparing Information Structures." Review of Economic Studies, 66(1), 183-98. Fox, Justin and Richard Van Weelden (2012), "Costly Transparency." Journal of Public Economics, 96 (1): 142-150. Holmstrom, Bengt (1999), "Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective." Review of Economic Studies, 66(1), 169-82. Maskin, Eric and Jean Tirole (2004), "The politician and the judge." The American Economic Review, 94 (4), 1034—1054. Morris, Stephen (2001)," Political Correctness." Journal of Political Economy, 109(2), 231-65. Prat, Andrea (2005), "The wrong kind of transparency". The American Economic Review, 95 (3), 862—877. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/43825 |