Decomposing European NUTS2 regional inequality from 1980 to 2009: national and European policy implications

Doran, Justin and Jordan, Declan (2013): Decomposing European NUTS2 regional inequality from 1980 to 2009: national and European policy implications. Published in: Journal of Economic Studies , Vol. 40, No. 1 (2013): pp. 22-38.

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse income inequality for a sample of 14 European countries and their composite regions using data from the Cambridge Econometrics regional dataset from 1980 to 2009. The purpose of the paper is to provide insight into the dynamics of regional and national cohesion among the EU-14 countries studied.

Design/methodology/approach – Initially, inequality is decomposed using the Theil coefficient into between and within country inequality to assess the extent to which convergence has occurred. To investigate the underlying causes of the changes in inequality, the Theil coefficient is further decomposed to assess the contribution of productivity and employment-population ratio differentials to inequality.

Findings – The results indicate that while between-country inequality has declined, within-country inequality has increased by approximately 50 percent. Subsequent decomposition indicates that while productivity levels among regions have converged, the employment-population ratios have diverged substantially driving increasing levels of inequality. This suggests that while EU cohesion policies have reduced productivity inequalities they have had little effect in stimulating convergence of employment-population ratios across regions.

Research limitations/implications – The paper argues that national priorities, particularly in the context of the current European economic crisis, are likely to hinder European Union level policies to reduce income inequality at a regional level. This may result in further increases in regional inequality among European regions.

Originality/value – This paper's main contribution is to highlight how national convergence can lead to regional divergence being overlooked. The value of the paper is that it provides policy insights, based on empirical evidence, for European cohesion policy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Europe, Convergence, Cohesion Policy
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R10 - General

References

Andreosso-O‘Callaghan, B. (2000) ‘The economic challenge of enlargement.’ In Ireland and the European Union: Nice, enlargement and the future of Europe, ed. M. Holmes Manchester University Press Manchester, UK

Baddeley, Michelle, Ron Martin, and Peter Tyler (1998) ‘European regional unemployment disparities: Convergence or persistence?’ European Urban and Regional Studies 5(3), 195–215

Boldrin, Michele, and Fabio Canova (2001) ‘Inequality and convergence in Europe’s regions: reconsidering European regional policies.’ Economic Policy 16(32), 205–253

Bourguignon, Francois (1979) ‘Decomposable income inequality measures.’ Econometrica 47(4), 901–920

Cambridge Econometrics (2009) European Regional Database (Cambridge)

Cappelen, Aadne, Fulvio Castellacci, Jan Fagerberg, and Bart Verspagen (2003) ‘The impact of EU regional support on growth and convergence in the European Union.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 41, 621–644

European Union (2008) Cohesion Policy 2007-13: National Strategic Reference Framewor (Belgium: European Commission)

European Union (2009) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council (Belgium: European Commission)

European Union (2010) Investing in Europes future (Belgium: European Commission)

Fingleton, Bernard, and Manfred Fischer (2010) ‘Neoclassical Theory Versus New Economic Geography: Competing Explanations of Cross-Regional Variation in Economic Development.’ The Annals of Regional Science 44(3), 467– 491

Fujita, M, P Krugman, and A Venables (1999) The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade (Cambridge: MIT Press)

Gardiner, Ben, Ron Martin, and Tyler Peter (2004) ‘Competitiveness, productivity and economic growth across the European regions.’ Regional Studies 38(9), 1045 – 1067

Gonzale, Sara (2011) ‘The North/South divide in Italy and England: Discursive construction of regional inequality.’ European Urban and Regional Studies 18(1), 62–76

Heidenrich, M, and C Wunder (2008) ‘Patterns of regional inequality in the enlarged Europe.’ European Social Review 24(1), 19 – 36

Kim, Young-Bae (2008) ‘Is there a trade-off between regional growth and national income? theory and evidence from the eu.’ University of Surrey Discussion Papers in Economics

Krugman, Paul (1998) ‘What’s new about the new economic geography?’ European Urban and Regional Studies 14(2), 7–17

Martin, Philippe (1999) ‘Public policies, regional inequalities and growth.’ Journal of Public Economics 73(1), 85 – 105

Martin, Ron (2001) ‘EMU versus the regions? Regional convergence and divergence in Euroland.’ Journal of Economic Geography 1(1), 51–80

Ostbye, Stein, and Olle Westerlund (2011) ‘Industrial structure, regional productivity and convergence: The case of Norway and Sweden.’ European Urban and Regional Studies 18(1), 4761

Puga, Diego (2002) ‘European regional policy in light of recent location theories.’ Journal of Economic Geography 2(4), 373 – 406

Rey, Sergio J., and Mark V. Janikas (2005) ‘Regional convergence, inequality, andspace.’ Journal of Economic Geography 5(2), 155–176

Romer, Paul M (1986) ‘Increasing returns and long-run growth.’ Journal of Political Economy 94(5), 1002–1037

Sala-i Martin, Xavier (1996) ‘The classical approach to convergence analysis.’ Economic Journal 106(437), 1019–36

Solow, Robert M (1956) ‘A contribution to the theory of economic growth.’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70(1), 65–94

Terrasi, Marinella (1999) ‘Convergence and divergence across italian regions.’ The Annals of Regional Science 33(4), 491–510