Felix, Ayadi and Marianne, Ojo (2013): Central bank independence: monetary policies in selected jurisdictions (I).
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_45679.pdf Download (164kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Even though the Congress and the Administration are responsible for determining fiscal policy measures, these measures impact the Fed Reserve's monetary policy decisons. The indirect effect of fiscal policy on the conduct of monetary policy through its influence on the overall economy and the economic outlook and the impact of federal tax and spending programs on the Fed Reserve' s key macroeconomic objectives - maximum employment and price stability, is notable in several situations and instances.
Hence, how independent is the Fed Reserve really from government and fiscal policy influences? Could it not be said that the Government really has a dual role in fiscal and monetary policy setting?Would it really be in the interest of accountability to delegate more powers to an already relatively powerful Fed Reserve?
Recent changes in the delegation of supervisory responsibilities in the UK, namely the transfer of bank supervision from the Financial Services Authority back to the Bank of England, and the resulting increased scope of the Bank of England's powers, would appear to suggest that in certain cases, regulatory bodies as well as central banks, should assume greater functions in certain capacities. Accordingly, jurisdiction specific cases have to be viewed individually and based on prevailing circumstances.
Whilst it is argued by some, that a reduction in central bank autonomy by subjecting its actions and decisions to legislative procedures and approvals, could result in more serious problems which would aggravate the stability of the economy and financial system, consequences of lack of close collaboration, coordination and timely exchange of information between tripartite authorities such as the relationship which exists between the UK's Financial Services Authority, the Bank of England and the Treasury were witnessed during the Northern Rock Crisis.
Hence it could be argued that the problem does not necessarily relate to a subjection of actions and decisions for approvals, but how well the authorities involved are able to communicate and coordinate information between them effectively. Subjecting actions and decisions of the central bank to other authorities could actually incorporate greater accountability and transparency into the supervisory and regulatory framework. Through an investigation of selected jurisdictions, this paper aims to contribute to the extant literature in investigating the relationship between central bank independence and price stability, as well as how such a relationship varies between different jurisdictions – even though it is widely argued that political and legislative interference is often contributory to price instability.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Central bank independence: monetary policies in selected jurisdictions (I) |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | central banks; stability; regulation; financial crises; macro prudential; Basel III; systemic risk; supervision; liquidity; monetary policy |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law |
Item ID: | 45679 |
Depositing User: | Dr Marianne Ojo |
Date Deposited: | 31 Mar 2013 05:44 |
Last Modified: | 09 Oct 2019 04:44 |
References: | Adebiyi, M.A. (2002). “Is Financial Sector Liberalization the Cause of Banking Fragility in Nigeria?” African Review of Money, Finance and Banking, 23-40. Alawode, A. and Ikhide, S.I. (1991). “Bank Liability Management, Structural Adjustment and Monetary Policy in Nigeria.” Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 33, No 2, 121-136. Arestis, P. and Demetriades, P. (1997). “Financial Development and Economic Growth: Assessing the Evidence.” The Economic Journal, Volume 107, #442, 783-799. Ayadi, O.F. (1996). “Marketing of Bank Services, Regulation, and Bank Profitability in an Emerging Banking System.” African Review of Money, Finance and Banking, 1/2, 107-119. Ayadi, O.F. and Hyman, L.(2006). “Financial Liberalization and Price Rigidity in the Nigerian Banking System.” Managerial Finance, Forthcoming. Aziakpono, M. and Babatope-Obasa, S. (2003). “Financial Liberalization, Currency Substitution and Savings in Nigeria: Evidence From Cointegration and Error Correction Modeling.” A paper presented at the 8th Annual Conference on Econometric Modeling for African Econometrics Society, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa. Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt A., and Levine R. (2000). “A New Database on Financial Development and Structure.” World Bank Economic Review, 14 (3), pp.597-605. Bibilari, O. (1962). “Banking in Nigeria is Booming.” New Pittsburgh Courier, Volume 3, Issue 7 (May 19), p. 13. Caprio,G. and Klingebiel, D. (1995). “Dealing with Bank Insolvencies: Cross Country Experience.” Washington, D.C., The World Bank. Central Bank of Nigeria, (1986). Annual Report and Statement of Accounts, December 31, Central Bank of Nigeria. Chete, L.N. (2001). “The Nigerian Banking Crisis: What Role Did the Macroeconomy Play?” Savings and Development, 25, No 1, Fischer, S. (1995). “Central-Bank Independence Revisited.” The American Economic Review, 85 (2), 201-206. Fraser, B.W. (19940. “Central Bank Independence: What Does it Mean?” Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin, December, 1-8. Haan, J. de and Kooi, W. (2000). “Does Central Bank Independence Really Matter? New Evidence for Developing Countries Using a New Indicator.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 24 (4), 643-664. Ikhide, S.I. and Alawode, A.A. (2001). “Financial Sector Reforms, Macroeconomic Instability, and the Order of Economic Liberalization: The Evidence from Nigeria.” AERC Research Paper #112, African Economic Research Consortium. Maliszewski, W.S. (2000). “Central Bank Independence in Transition Economies.” Economics of Transition, 8 (3), 749-789. Odedokun, M.O. (1990). “A Balance Sheet Approach to Evaluating Central Bank Behaviour: Econometric Results from Quarterly Data.” Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 32 (1), 45-67. Olalusi, F. (1992). Introduction to Banking. Ibadan: Evans Brothers (Nigeria Publishers) Limited. Otero, J. and Ramirez, M. (2006). “Inflation Before and After Central Bank Independence: The Case of Colombia.” Journal of Development Economics, 79, 168-182. Panagiotidis, T. and Triampella, A. (2006). “Central Bank Independence and Inflation: The Case of Greece.” Revista de Economía del Rosario (Colombia), 9 (1), 95-109. Sanusi, J.O. (2002a). “The Evolution of Monetary Management in Nigeria and Its Impact on Economic Development.” CBN Bullion, Volume 26, #1, 1-11. Sanusi, J.O. (2002b). “Central bank and the Macroeconomic Environment in Nigeria.” Lecture delivered at National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies, August. Sawyer, M. (2006). “Inflation Targeting and Central Bank Independence: We are All Keynesians Now! Or Are We?” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 28 (4), 639-652. Sturm, J.E. and Haan, J. de. (2001). “Inflation in Developing Countries: Does Central Bank Independence Matter? New Evidence Based on a New Data Set.” CESifo Working Paper No. CESifo GmbH. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/45679 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Central bank independence: monetary policies in selected jurisdictions (I). (deposited 31 Mar 2013 05:44) [Currently Displayed]