Kumar, Santosh and Dansereau, Emily and Murray, Chris (2012): Does Distance matter for Institutional Delivery in Rural India? An Instrumental Variable Approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_45762.pdf Download (278kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Skilled attendance at childbirth is crucial for decreasing maternal and neonatal mortality, yet many women in low- and middle-income countries deliver outside of health facilities, without skilled help. Distance to health facility is considered to be an important non-monetary barrier that impede utilization of health facilities. In this paper, we examine if access to health facilities affects institutional births in a resource-constrained country like India. We use Two-Stage Residual Inclusion (2SRI) and IV-Probit models to account for endogenous placement of health facilities. Our findings indicate that women living closer to health facilities have a higher probability of giving birth in health facility. An increase of one kilometer in the distance to the nearest health facility decreases the probability of institutional delivery by 4.4%. The results from policy simulation suggest that restricting the maximum distance to 5 kilometers would increase institutional delivery by 10%. Overall, our findings show that distance is an important barrier to service utilization and increasing the density of health facilities or improving transport infrastructure may be an important policy tool to improve facility-based delivery in developing countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Does Distance matter for Institutional Delivery in Rural India? An Instrumental Variable Approach |
English Title: | Does Distance matter for Institutional Delivery in Rural India? An Instrumental Variable Approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | In-facility delivery, access, distance, India. |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I0 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I15 - Health and Economic Development I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy ; Regulation ; Public Health |
Item ID: | 45762 |
Depositing User: | Santosh Kumar |
Date Deposited: | 29 May 2013 04:30 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 03:55 |
References: | Angrist, Joshua D., and Alan B. Krueger. 2001. Instrumental variables and the search for identification: from supply and demand to natural experiments." Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4): 69–85. Angrist JD and Pischke J-S. 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton University Press. Armstrong Schellenberg JR, Mrisho M, Manzi F. 2008. Health and survival of young children in southern Tanzania. BMC Public Health 8:194 Becher H, Muller O, Jahn A, Gbangou A, Kynast-Wolf G, Kouyate B. 2004. Risk factors of infant and child mortality in rural Burkina Faso. Bull World Health Organ 82: 265-273. Bhattacharya J, Goldman D, McCaffrey D. 2006. Estimating probit models with self-selected treatments. Statistics in Medicine 25: 389–413. Bleakley H. 2010. Health, Human Capital, and Development, Annual Reviews of Economics, 2:283–310. Borah B. 2006. A mixed logit model of health care provider choice: analysis of NSS data for rural India. Health Economics 15: 915–32. Broeck J, Eeckels R, Massa G. 1996. Maternal determinants of child survival in a rural African community. Int J Epidemiol 25: 998-1004. Cameron, Colin A. and Pravin K. Trivedi. 2009. Microeconometrics Using Stata, Texas: Stata Press. Collier, Paul, Dercon, Stefan, and John Mckinnon. 2002. Density versus quality in health care provision: using household data to make budgetary choices in ethiopia. World Bank Econ Rev 16(3): 425-448. Elo IT. 1992. Utilisation of maternal health-care services in Peru: the role of women’s education. Health Transit Rev 2(1): 49-69. Gething, Peter W., Amoako Johnson, Fiifi et al. 2012. Geographical access to care at birth in Ghana: a barrier to safe motherhood. Southampton, GB, ESRC Centre for Population Change, 34pp. (Centre for Population Change Working Paper, 21). Hellevik, O. 2009. Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Quality and Quantity 43:59–74. Hjortsberg, C. 2003. Why do the sick not utilise health care? The case of Zambia. Health Economics 12: 755–70. Hogan MC, Foreman KJ, Naghavi M, et al. 2010. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980-2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. The Lancet 375: 1609-23. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), 2010. District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007-08, IIPS, Mumbai, India. Kesterton AJ, Cleland J, Sloggett A & and Ronsmans C. 2010. Institutional delivery in rural India: the relative importance of accessibility and economic status. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 10:30. Kumar RM, Singh M, Kaur M. 1997. Impact of health centre availability on utilisation of maternity care and pregnancy outcome in a rural area of Haryana. J Indian Med Assoc 95(8):448-50. Lavy, Victor. 1996. School supply constraints and children’s educational outcomes in rural ghana. Journal of Development Economics 51(2): 291–314. Lim SS, Dandona L, Lalit, Hoisington JA, James SL, Hogan MC, Gakidou E. 2010. India’s Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. The Lancet Vol. 375, Issue 9730, Pages 2009-2023. Matthews Z, Ramakrishna J et al. 2005. Birth-rights and rituals in rural south India: Care-seeking in the intra-partum period. J Biosoc Sci 37(4): 385-411. Moisi JC, Hellen Gatakaa, Abdisalan M Noor, Thomas N Williams. 2010. Geographic access to care is not a determinant of child mortality in a rural Kenyan setting with high health facility density. BMC Public Health 10: 142. Mukhopadhyay Abhiroop and Soham Sahoo. 2012. Does access to secondary education affect primary schooling? evidence from India. IZA DP No. 6507. Odiit A, Amuge B. 2003. COMPARISON OF VACCINATION STATUS OF CHILDREN BORN IN HEALTH UNITS AND THOSE BORN AT HOME, East African Medical Journal, 80(1). Ronsmans C, Graham WJ. 2006. On behalf of the lancet maternal survival series steering group: maternal mortality: who, when, where and why. The Lancet 368: 1189-1200. Rutherford ME, Dockerty JD, Jasseh M, Howie SR, Herbison P, Jeffries DJ, Leach M, Stevens W , Mulholland K, Adegbola RA, Hill PC. 2009. Access to health care and mortality of children under 5 years of age in the Gambia: a case-control study. Bull World Health Organ 87: 216-224. Sarma Sisira. 2009. Demand for outpatient healthcare: empirical findings from rural India. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, 7(4): 265-277. Sawhney N. 1993. Management of family welfare programmes in Uttar Pradesh: infrastructure utilisation, quality of services, supervision and MIS. In Family Planning and MCH in Uttar Pradesh (A Review of Studies). Edited by Premi M. New Delhi: Indian Association for the Study of Population; 50-67. Stephenson R, Tsui A. 2002. Contextual influences on reproductive wellness in Northern India. Am J Public Health 93(11):1820-1829. Terza J, Basu A, Rathouz P. 2008. Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. Journal of Health Economics 27(3): 531–543. Thaddeus S, Maine D. 1994. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 38(8):1089-1110. World Health Organization, UNFPA and the World Bank. 2010. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2008 estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and the World Bank, Geneva: World Health Organization. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/45762 |