Chowdhury, Subhasish and Lee, Dongryul and Sheremeta, Roman (2013): Top Guns May Not Fire: Best-Shot Group Contests with Group-Specific Public Good Prizes. Forthcoming in: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_46654.pdf Download (247kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We analyze a group contest in which n groups compete to win a group-specific public good prize. Group sizes can be different and any player may value the prize differently within and across groups. Players exert costly efforts simultaneously and independently. Only the highest effort (the best-shot) within each group represents the group effort that determines the winning group. We fully characterize the set of equilibria and show that in any equilibrium at most one player in each group exerts strictly positive effort. There always exists an equilibrium in which only the highest value player in each active group exerts strictly positive effort. However, perverse equilibria may exist in which the highest value players completely free-ride on others by exerting no effort. We provide conditions under which the set of equilibria can be restricted and discuss contest design implications.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Top Guns May Not Fire: Best-Shot Group Contests with Group-Specific Public Good Prizes |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | best-shot technology; group contest; group-specific public goods; free-riding |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods |
Item ID: | 46654 |
Depositing User: | Roman Sheremeta |
Date Deposited: | 02 May 2013 09:30 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 23:58 |
References: | Abbink, K., Brandts, J., Herrmann, B. & Orzen, H. (2010). Inter-Group Conflict and Intra-Group Punishment in an Experimental Contest Game. American Economic Review, 100, 420-447. Ahn, T.K., R, Isaac, M. & Salmon, T.C. (2011). Rent Seeking in Groups. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29, 116-125. Baik, K.H. (1993). Effort levels in contests: The public-good prize case. Economics Letters, 41, 363-367. Baik, K.H., and Shogren, J.F. (1998). A behavioral basis for best-shot public-good contests. In: Baye, M.R. (Ed.), Advances in Applied Microeconomics: Contests, Vol. 7. JAI Press, Stamford, CT, 169-178. Baik, K.H., Kim, I.G., and Na, S. (2001). Bidding for a group-specific public-good prize. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 415-429. Baik. K.H. (2008). Contests with group-specific public-good prizes. Social Choice and Welfare, 30, 103-117. Barr, N. (2004). Economics of the welfare state. New York: Oxford University Press. Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., and Varian, H. (1986). On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 25-49. Bliss, C.J., and Nalebuff, B. (1984). Dragon-slaying and Ballroom Dancing: The Private Supply of a Public Good. Journal of Public Economics, 25, 1-12. Cason, T.N., Sheremeta, R.M. & Zhang, J. (2012). Communication and Efficiency in Competitive Coordination Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 76, 26-43. Chowdhury, S.M., and Sheremeta, R.M. (2011). Multiple Equilibria in Tullock Contests. Economics Letters, 112, 216-219. Clark, D.J., and Konrad, K.A. (2007). Asymmetric Conflict: weakest-link against Best Shot. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 457-469. Conybeare, J.A.C., Murdoch, J.C., and Sandler., T. (1994). Alternative Collective-Goods Models of Military Coalitions: Theory and Empirics. Economic Inquiry, 32, 525-542. Cornes, R. (1993), Dyke maintenance and other stories: some neglected types of public goods, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 259-271. Dall’Asta, L., Pin, P., and Ramezan-pour., A. (2011). Optimal Equilibria of the Best-Shot Game. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 13, 885-901. Dechenaux, E., Kovenock, D., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). A Survey of Experimental Research on Contests, All-Pay Auctions and Tournaments. ESI Working Paper. Deck, C. & Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). Fight or Flight? Defending Against Sequential Attacks in the Game of Siege. Journal of Conflict Resolution, forthcoming. Galeotti, A., Goyal, S., Jackson, M., Vega–Redondo, F., and Yariv, L. (2010). Network Games. Review of Economic Studies, 77, 218-244. Harrison, G.W., and Hirshleifer, J. (1989). An experimental evaluation of weakest link/best shot models of public goods. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 201-225. Hirshleifer, J. (1983). From weakest-link to best-shot: The voluntary provision of public goods. Public Choice, 41, 371-386. Hirshleifer, J. (1985). From weakest-link to best-shot: Correction. Public Choice, 46, 221-223. Katz, E., Nitzan, S. and Rosenberg, J., (1990). Rent seeking for pure public goods. Public Choice, 65, 49–60. Kolmar, M. and Wagener A. (2012). Contests and the Private Production of Public goods. Southern Economic Journal, 79, 161-179. Kolmar, M., and Rommeswinkel, H. (2010). Group Contests with Complementarities in Efforts, U. of St. Gallen Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2010-12. Lee, D. (2012). Weakest-link contests with group-specific public good prizes. European Journal of Political Economy, 28, 238-248. Münster, J. (2009). Group contest success functions. Economic Theory, 41, 345-357. Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Phillips, R.A. (1997). Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7, 51-66. Sheremeta, R.M. (2011). Perfect-Substitutes, Best-Shot, and Weakest-Link Contests between Groups. Korean Economic Review, 27, 5-32. Sheremeta, R.M. & Zhang, J. (2010). Can Groups Solve the Problem of Over-Bidding in Contests? Social Choice and Welfare, 35, 175-197. Stein, W.E. (2002). Asymmetric rent-seeking with more than two contestants. Public Choice, 113, 325-336. Topolyan, I. (2011). Extreme Free-riding in All-pay Auctions. University of Cincinnati Working paper. Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient Rent Seeking. In James M. Buchanan, Robert D. Tollison, Gordon Tullock, (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 97-112. Varian, H.A. (2004). System Reliability and Free Riding, Economics of Information Security. Advances in Information Security, 12, 1-15. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/46654 |