Höök, Mikael and Fantazzini, Dean and Angelantoni, André and Snowden, Simon (2013): Hydrocarbon liquefaction: viability as a peak oil mitigation strategy. Forthcoming in: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: A
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_46957.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Current world capacity of hydrocarbon liquefaction is around 400,000 barrels per day (kb/d), providing a marginal share of the global liquid fuel supply. This study performs a broad review of technical, economic, environmental, and supply chains issues related to coal-to-liquids (CTL) and gas-to-liquids (GTL). We find three issues predominate. First, significant amounts of coal and gas would be required to obtain anything more than a marginal production of liquids. Second, the economics of CTL plants are clearly prohibitive, but are better for GTL. Nevertheless, large scale GTL plants still require very high upfront costs, and for three real world GTL plants out of four, the final cost has been so far approximately three times that initially budgeted. Small scale GTL holds potential for associated gas. Third, CTL and GTL both incur significant environmental impacts, ranging from increased greenhouse gas emissions (in the case of CTL) to water contamination. Environmental concerns may significantly affect growth of these projects until adequate solutions are found.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Hydrocarbon liquefaction: viability as a peak oil mitigation strategy |
English Title: | Hydrocarbon liquefaction: viability as a peak oil mitigation strategy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | hydrocarbon liquefaction, gas-to-liquids, CTL, GTL, coal-to-liquids, peak oil |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q32 - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q38 - Government Policy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 46957 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Dean Fantazzini |
Date Deposited: | 13 May 2013 21:03 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 14:33 |
References: | Aasberg-Petersen, K., Christiansen, T.S., Stub Nielsen, Dybkjær, I., 2003.Recent developments in auto-thermal reforming and pre-reforming for synthesis gas production in GTL applications. Fuel Processing Technology, 83(1–3), 253–261. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00073-0 Adedeji, O. 2008. Natural Gas and the Economics of GTL with some Comparisons to LNG, The University of Texas at Austin, May 2008 Al-Shalchi, Wisam 2006. Gas to Liquids Technology (GTL), Baghdad. Available from: http://178.89.159.60/docs/Gasifiers/Gas_To_Liquids_Technology_2006.pdf Ang, L., Baig, Y., Kanu, E., and Pwaga, S., 2010. Natural Gas As Transportation Fuel: Conversion To Liquid Fuel And Direct Utilization, Department Of Petroleum Engineering And Applied Geophysics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Available from http://iptibm1.ipt.ntnu.no/~jsg/undervisning/naturgass/oppgaver/Oppgaver2010/10Ang.pdf Bacaud, R., Jamond, M., Diack, M., Gruber, R. 1994. Development and evaluation of iron based catalysts for the hydroliquefaction of coal.International Journal of Energy Research, 18(2):167–176. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.4440180214 Bakkerud, P.K., 2005. Update on synthesis gas production for GTL. Catalysis Today, 106(1–4), 30–33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.147 Balogun, O. and Onyekonwu M. 2009 Economic Viability of Gas-to-Liquids in Nigeria, Paper presented at the Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, 3-5 August 2009, Abuja, Nigeria. Available from http://www.onepetro.org/mslib/servlet/onepetropreview?id=SPE-128342-MS Bao, B., El-Halwagi, M., Elbashir, N. 2010. Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(7): 703-713. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.02.001 Barney, J.B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1):99-120. Bartis, J., Camm, F., Ortiz, D., 2008. Producing liquid fuels from coal: prospects and policy issues. Report by RAND Corporation.MG-754-AF/NETL. Santa Monica, California. Available from: http://www.rand.org / Bellman, D.K., Burnes, J.E., Clemente, M.L., Katzer, J.R., Kawalkin, G.J., Muntean, G.G., Schenk, H., Strakey, J.P., Trecazzi, C.S., 2007. Coal to liquids and gas - topic paper #18.National Petroleum Council. Available from: http://www.npc.org Benito, A., Cebolla, V., Fernandez, I.,Martinez, M.T., Miranda, J.L., Oelert, H.,Prado, I.G., 1994. Transport fuels from two-stage coal liquefaction, International Journal of Energy Research, 18(2): 257–265. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.4440180225 Berg, D., Oakley, B., Parikh, S., Paterson, A., 2007.The business case for coal gasification with co-production – an analysis of the business risks, potential incentives, and financial prospects, with and without carbon sequestration. Report from Scully Capital Services. Washington, D.C. Available from: http://www.climatevision.gov/pdfs/Co-Production_Report.pdf Black B. 2010 Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Valuation of GTL and LNG Projects, Master Thesis , The University of Texas at Austin, May. Available from http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/ETD-UT-2010-05-1342 BP, 2012. Statistical Review of World Energy 2012. British Petroleum,.Available from: http://www.bp.com/sectionbodycopy.do?categoryId=7500&contentId=7068481 Brandt, A.R., Farrell, A.E., 2007. Scraping the bottom of the barrel: greenhouse gas emission consequences of a transition to low-quality and synthetic petroleum resources. Climatic Change, 84(3-4): 241–263. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9275-y Bridgwater, A.V., Anders, M., 1994.Production costs of liquid fuels by indirect coal liquefaction. International Journal of Energy Research, 18(2): 97-108, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.4440180207 Bunce, P., Gould, P., 1996. From lean to agile manufacturing. IEE Colloquium Digest, 1996, Issue 278. Van der Burgt, M.J., van Leeuwen, C.J., del'Amico, J.J., Sie, S.T., 1988. The Shell Middle Distillate Synthesis process. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 36,473–482. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(09)60541-3 Camm, F. Bartis, J., Bushman, C., 2008. Federal financial incentives to induce early experience producing unconventional liquid fuels. Report by RAND Corporation. TR-586-AF. Santa Monica, California. Available from: http://www.rand.org/ Carle, M., Martel, A., Zufferey, N., 2012. The CAT metaheauristic for the solution of multi-period activity-based supply chain network design problems. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(2): 644–677. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.06.016 Castelo Branco, D., Alexandre, S., and Schaeffer, R., 2010. Co2e emissions abatement costs of reducing natural gas flaring in Brazil by investing in offshore GTL plants producing premium diesel, Energy, 35(1): 158-167. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.09.006 Chang, T., 2000. South African company commercializes new F-T process. Oil & Gas Journal, 98(2):42–45. Chedid, R., Kobrosly, M., and Ghajar, R. 2007. The potential of gas-to-liquid technology in the energy market: The case of Qatar. Energy Policy, 35(10): 4799-4811. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.017. Chen, H., Reilly, J., Paltsev, S., 2011. The prospects for coal-to-liquid conversion: A general equilibrium analysis. Energy Policy 39(9):4713–4725. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.056 Chijemezu, M.A. 2009 Market potentials of Gas-to-Liquids technology and its comparison with Liquefied Natural Gas, Seminar paper at the Department of Petroleum and Gas Engineering University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria). Christopher, M., Towill, D.R., 2000. Marrying the lean and agile paradigms. Proc. EUROMA Conference, Ghent, 2000, 114-121. Collot, A.G., 2006.Matching Gasification technologies to coal properties. International Journal of Coal Geology, 65(3-4):191–212. DOI: http://dx.doi/10.1016/j.coal.2005.05.003 Comolli, A.G., Lee, L.K., Pradhan, V.R., Stalzer, R.H., Karolkiewicz, W.F., and Pablacio, R.M., 1999. Direct liquefaction proof-of-concept program. Final report prepared by Hydrocarbon Technologies Inc. (Lawrenceville, New Jersey, USA) and Kerr-McGee Corporation (Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA) for the Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center, US Department of Energy, DE-92148-TOP-02. Available from: http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/772402-Us5qhE/webviewable/772402.pdf CompactGTL. 2010. Compact GTL as an Associated Gas Solution, World XTL10 Summit CompactGTL. 2011. Information center. Available at http://compactgtl.com/information-centre Couch, G.R,, 2008. Coal to Liquids, IEA Clean Coal Centre publication CCC/132, 2008. Available from: http://www.coalonline.info/site/coalonline/content/browser/81994/Coal-to-liquids Day, M.E., 2003. Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis – Industrial. In: Horvath, I.T., (Ed.) Encyclopedia of catalysis. Wiley, 2003, 4775 p. de Pater, C.J. and Baisch, S., 2011. Geomechanical Study of Bowland Shale Seismicity:http://www.cuadrillaresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Geomechanical-Study-of-Bowland-Shale-Seismicity_02-11-11.pdf Deutsche Bank. 2010. Special Report: Sasol Ltd - The GTL Catalyst; Buy, Global Market Research, Deutsche Securities, November. Available from http://www.fullermoney.com/content/2010-11-11/sasol.pdf DOE/NETL, 2007. Baseline technical and economic assessment of a commercial scale Fischer-Tropsch liquids facility. US Department of Energy (DOE), National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) joint report, DOE/NETL-2007/1260, Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.netl.doe.gov/ DOE/NETL, 2009. Affordable, low-carbon diesel fuel from domestic coal and biomass. US Department of Energy (DOE), National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) joint report DOE/NETL-2009/1349, Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.netl.doe.gov/ Dry, M., 2002. The Fischer–Tropsch process: 1950–2000. Catalysis Today, 71(3–4):227–241. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(01)00453-9 Duvenhage, D., Coville, N.J., 2006. Deactivation of a precipitated iron Fischer–Tropsch catalyst — a pilot plant study. Applied Catalysis A: General, 298:211–216.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2005.10.009 Economides, M., 2005. The economics of gas to liquids compared to liquefied natural gas. World Energy, 8(1): 3-7, March. EIA, 2006. Annual Energy Outlook 2006 with Projections to 2030. Energy Information Administration, February 2006. Available from:http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo06/index.html EIA, 2012a. Annual Energy Outlook 2012. Energy Information Administration, June 2012. Available from: http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/ EIA, 2012b. Coalbed methane production. Available from: http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_coalbed_s1_a.htm Eilers, J., Posthuma, S.A., Sie, S.T., 1990. The Shell middle distillate synthesis process (SMDS). Catalysis Letters, 7:253–269. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00764507 Ekinci, E. Yardim, Y., Razvigorova, M., Minkova, V., Goranova, M., Petrov, N., Budinova, T., 2002. Characterization of liquid products from pyrolysis of subbituminous coals. Fuel Processing Technology, 77–78: 309-315. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(02)00056-5 Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. Methane emissions 1990 – 2020: inventories, projections, and opportunities for reductions. Report from US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA 430-R-99-013. September 1999. Available from: http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=600009LH.txt Environmental Protection Agency, 2005. Final programmatic environmental impact statement on mountaintop mining/valley fills in Appalachia. Report from US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA 903-R-05002, October 2005. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/region3/mtntop/eis2005.htm Epstein, P.R., Bunocore, J.J., Eckerle, K., Hendryx, M., Stout III, B.M., Heinberg, R., Clapp, R.W., May, B., Reinhart, N.L., Ahern, M.M., Doshi, S.K., Glustrom, L., 2011. Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1219, 73–98. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05890.x Erturk, M., 2011. Economic analysis of unconventional liquid fuel sources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6): 2766-2771. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.03.028 Faisal, M.N., Banwet, D.K., Shankar, R., 2007. Information risks management in supply chains: an assessment and mitigation framework. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20(6):677–699. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410390710830727 Fantazzini, D., Höök, M., Angelantoni, A., 2011. Global oil risks in the early 21st Century. Energy Policy, 39(12):7865–7873. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.035 Fleisch, T.H., Sills, R.A., Briscoe, M.D., 2002. 2002 - Emergence of the Gas-to-Liquids industry: a review of global GTL developments. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 11(1–2), 1–14. Fletcher, J.J., Sun, Q., Bajura, R.A., Zhang, Y., Ren, X., 2004. Coal to clean fuel – the Shenhua investment in Direct Coal Liquefaction. Presentation at the third US-China Clean Energy Conference, 18-19 October 2004, Morgantown, USA. Available from: http://www.nrcce.wvu.edu/conferences/2004/China/ Floudas, C.A., Elia, J.A., Baliban, R.C., 2012. Hybrid and single feedstock energy processes for liquid transportation fuels: a critical review. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 41: 24-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.02.008 Gradassi, M.J., 2001. Gas-to-liquids R&D: Setting cost reduction targets. In: Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis (ed. Iglesia, E., Spivey, J.J., Fleish, T.H.), pp. 429-434. Elsevier. Haid, J., Koss, U., 2001. Lurgi's Mega-Methanol technology opens the door for a new era in down-stream applications. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 136, 399–404. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(01)80336-0 Hammami, R., Frein, Y., Hadj-Alouane, A.B., 2008. Supply chain design in the delocalization context: relevant features and new modeling tendencies. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2): 641–656. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.10.016 Hammami, R., Frein, Y., Hadj-Alouane, A.B., 2009. A strategic-tactical model for the supply chain design in the delocalization context: Mathematical formulation and a case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1): 351–365. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.030 Hatch, 2008. Fairbanks economic development corporation coal to liquids, FEL1 Study. Report prepared by Hatch Ltd for the benefit of Fairbanks Economic Development Corporation. October 2008. Hendryx, M., O’Donnell, K., Horn, K., 2008. Lung cancer mortality is elevated in coal mining areas of Appalachia. Lung cancer mortality is elevated in coal-mining areas of Appalachia. Lung Cancer, 62(1), 1–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.02.004 Hirsch, R.L., Bezdek, R. Wendling, R., 2005. Peaking of world oil production: impacts, mitigation, & risk management. US Department of Energy Report. Available from: http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/others/pdf/Oil_Peaking_NETL.pdf Hirsch, R.L., 2008. Mitigation of maximum world oil production: Shortage scenarios. Energy Policy, 36(2): 881–889. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.009 Holland, A., 2012. Examination of possibly induced seismicity from hydraulic fracturing in the Eola Field, Garvin County, Oklahoma (Open File Report), Oklahoma Geological Survey, August 2011. Hossain, I. and Gülen, G. 2007. Lifecycle analysis of different urban transport options for Bangladesh, Energy Policy, 35(10): 4909-4918. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.036 Huang, L., Schobert, H.H., 2005. Comparison of temperature conditions in direct liquefaction of selected low-rank coals. Energy & Fuels, 19(1):200–207, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef0301710 Höök, M., Hirsch R.L., Aleklett, K., 2009. Giant oil field decline rates and their influence on world oil production. Energy Policy, 37(6):2262–2272. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.020 Höök, M., Aleklett, K., 2010. A review on coal to liquid fuels and its coal consumption. International Journal of Energy Research, 34(10):848–864. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.1596 IEA, 2011. World Energy Outlook 2011. Available from: http://www.iea.org IEA, 2012. World Energy Outlook 2012. Available from: http://www.iea.org IEA 2012c. Golden rules for a golden age of gas. World Energy Outlook special report on natural gas, 2012. Iandoli, C.L., Kjelstrup, S., 2007. Exergy analysis of a GTL process based on low-temperature slurry F−T reactor technology with a cobalt catalyst. Energy & Fuels, 21(4), 2317–2324. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef060646y IPCC, 2007. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: mitigation of climate change. Available from: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg3/ar4-wg3-chapter5.pdf Kerr, J., 2006. Streamlining the cash flow. Supply Chain Management Review, S25–S31. Khodakov, A.Y., Chu., W., Fongarland, P., 2007. Advances in the Development of Novel Cobalt Fischer−Tropsch Catalysts for Synthesis of Long-Chain Hydrocarbons and Clean Fuels. Chemical Reviews, 107(5), 1692–1744. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chin.200733255 de Klerk, A., 2009. Beyond Fischer-Tropsch: Coal-to-liquids production and refining. Elsevier, 752 p. Kreutz, T., Larson, E., Liu, G., Williams, R., 2008. Fischer-Tropsch Fuels from Coal and Biomass, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, 29 September to 2 October, Pittsburgh, USA. Available from: http://web.mit.edu/mitei/docs/reports/kreutz-fischer-tropsch.pdf Krishnamurthy, R. and Yauch, C.A. 2007. Leagile manufacturing: a proposed corporate infrastructure. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(6), 588–604. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570710750277 Larson, E.D., Fiorese, G., Liu,G., Williams, R, Kreutz, T., Consonni, S., 2009. Co-production of synfuels and electricity from coal + biomass with zero net carbon emissions: an Illinois case study. Energy Procedia, 1(1): 4371-4378. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.251 Lei, S., Zhang, J., 2009. An analysis of coal-to-oil industry’s impact on environment. Shenhua Science and Technology 7(3), 84–88. Levary, R.R., 2007. Ranking foreign suppliers based on supply risk. Supply Chain Management, 12(6):392–394. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598540710826317 Li, Y.W., 2007. Synfuels China and its Development in advanced CTL Process Technologies. Presentation by Synfuels China LTD, 23 May 2007. Available from: http://live.belfercenter.org/files/06-yongwang_li.pdf Liu, Z., Shi, S., Li, Y., 2010. Coal liquefaction technologies — development in China and challenges in chemical reaction engineering. Chemical Engineering Science, 65(1):12–17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.05.014 Liu, P., Whitaker, A., Pistikopoulos, E.N., Li, Z., 2011. A mixed-integer programming approach to strategic planning of chemical centres: A case study in the UK. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 35(8): 1359-1373. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.01.014 Lloyd’s, 2010. Sustainable energy security — strategic risks and opportunities for business. Lloyd’s of London white paper on sustainable energy security. See also:http://www.lloyds.com/~/media/Lloyds/Reports/360%20Energy%20Security/7238_Lloyds_360_Energy_Pages.pdf Longwell, J.P., Rubin, E.S., Wilson, J., 1995. Coal: Energy for the future. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 21(4): 269–360. DOI: http://10.1016/0360-1285(95)00007-0 Loomis, J., Quattlebaum, K.,Brown, T., Alexander, S., 2003. Expanding institutional arrangements for acquiring water for environmental purposes: transactions evidence for the Western United States. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 19(1):21–28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713672720 Malhotra, R., 2005. Direct coal liquefaction – lessons learned. Paper presented at GCEP advanced coal workshop, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA, 16 March 2005. Available from: http://gcep.stanford.edu/pdfs/RxsY3908kaqwVPacX9DLcQ/malhotra_coal_mar05.pdf Mantripragada, H., Rubin, E., 2009. CO2–reduction potential of coal-to-liquids (CTL) plants. Energy Procedia, 1(1):4331–4338. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.246 Mantripragada, H., Rubin, E., 2011. Techno-economic evaluation of coal-to-liquids (CTL) plants with carbon capture and sequestration. Energy Policy, 39(5):2808–2816. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.053 McCollum, D.L., Ogden, J.M., 2009. Future impacts of coal distribution constraints on coal costs. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(3):460–471. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2008.09.011 Mielke, E., Anadon, L., Narayanamurti, V., 2010. Water Consumption of Energy Resource Extraction, Processing, and Conversion - a review of the literature for estimates of water intensity of energy-resource extraction, processing to fuels, and conversion to electricity. Discussion Paper 2010-15.BelferCenter.Available from: http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/20479/ Milici, R., 2009. Coal-to-Liquids: Potential Impact on U.S. Coal Reserves. Natural Resources Research, 18(2):85–94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11053-009-9093-1 Myers, T., 2012. Potential contaminant pathways from hydraulically fractured shale to aquifers. Groundwater, 50(6), 872–882. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00933.x National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2006. Emerging issues for fossil energy and water. Available from: http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-gas/publications/AP/IssuesforFEandWater.pdf NONOX BV, 2007. Enhancements in the well to wheel path of natural gas, Multi Disciplinair Project Group 3, Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry. Available from http://students.chem.tue.nl/ifp23/report.pdf NRC, 2012. Induced Seismicity Potential in Energy Technologies (Prepublication), National Academies Press, 2012. National Petroleum Council, 2007. Facing the Hard Truths about Energy and supplementary material: Topic Papers on GTL and CTL. Report from July 2007. Available from: http://www.npchardtruthsreport.org/ Nunez-Mata, D. 2010. Evaluation Of Alternatives For Disposal And Monetization Of Associated Natural Gas – Offshore Deepwater Brazil, Master Thesis, Mewbourne School Of Petroleum And Geological Engineering, University of Oklahoma (USA). Available at http://mpge.ou.edu/research/documents/2010%20thesis/DANIEL%20NUNEZ%20MATA.pdf NY Times, 2011.Natural gas's toxic waste, drilling down. The New York Times Series on natural-gas drilling. Accessed Aug 20, 2012 Oke, A., Gopalakrishnan M., 2009. Managing disruptions in supply chains: A case study of a retail supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(1):168–174. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.08.045 Ogugbue, C., Chukwu, G. and Khataniar, S. 2007 . Economics of GTL Technology for Gas Utilization, Society of Petroleum Engineers - Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, Dallas (Texas, USA), April 1-3, 107654-MS. Available from http://www.onepetro.org/mslib/servlet/onepetropreview?id=SPE-107654-MS Oil and Gas Eurasia 2009. Flaring Up - Companies Pay High Costs To Be Green, 4, April. Available at http://www.oilandgaseurasia.com/articles/p/97/article/883/ Osborn, S., Vengosh, A., Warner, N., Jackson R., 2011. Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, January, 2011. Palmer, M.A., Bernhart, E.S., Schlesinger, W.H., Eshleman, K.N., Foufoula-Georgiou, E., Hendryx, M.S., Likens, G.E., Loucks, O.L., Power, M.E., White, P.S., Wilcock, P.R., 2010. Mountaintop mining consequences. Science, 327(5962), 148–149. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180543 Panahi, M., Rafiee, A., Skogestad, S., Hillestad, M., 2012. A natural gas to liquids process model for optimal operation. Industrial and Engineering Chemical Research, 51(1), 425–433. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie2014058 Patel, B. 2005. Gas Monetisation: A techno-Economic Comparison of Gas-to-Liquid and LNG, Foster Wheeler, Presented at 7th World Congress on Chemical Engineering, Glasgow. Available from http://www.fosterwheeler.com/publications/tech_papers/files/IChemE%20WCCE%2005%20LNG%20versus%20GTL.pdf Purwanto, W. Mulia, Saputra, A. , Thaib, A., Hanif, A., Yagus, A. 2005. Gas-To-Liquids (GTL) as an option in monetizing stranded gas field. feasibility analyses using integrated process routes, Departemen Teknik Gas dan Petrokimia Fakultas Teknik Universitas Indonesia. Available from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/90765442/GTL-for-Matindok-Gas-Fields-as-an-option Rahmin I. 2008. SPECIAL REPORT: GTL, CTL finding roles in global energy supply, Oil & Gas Journal, 196(12), March 24. Rahman, O. and Al-Maslamani, M. 2004. GTL: Is it an attractive route for monetization, Society of Petroleum Engineers - Abu Dhabi International Conference and Exhibition, 10-13 October 2004, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 88642-MS. Available from http://www.onepetro.org/mslib/servlet/onepetropreview%3Fid%3D00088642%26soc%3DSPE Rahman O. 2008. Gas to Liquid (GTL): is it an attractive route for gas monetization? GTL vs. LNG Economics, Egypt Oil and Gas Newspaper, 13:10. Available from: http://www.egyptoil-gas.com/read_article_issues.php?AID=143 Ramdass, A. 2010. NIB’s US$ 10 World GTL Investment a con job, Trinidad Express Newspapers, Trinidad Express Newspapers, September 23. Available from http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/NIB_s_US_10m_World_GTL_investment__a_con_job_-103685499.html RAND, 2008. Producing liquid fuels from coal - prospects and policy issues. Monograph prepared for the US Air Force and the National Energy Technology Laboratory of the US Department of Energy by RAND Corporation. Available from: http://www.rand.org Robertson, E. 1999. Options for gas-to-liquids technology in Alaska, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, INEEL/EXT-99-01023, Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-99ID1372. Available from http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/3318115.pdf Robinson, K., Tatterson, D., 2008. Economics on Fischer-Tropsch coal-to-liquids method updated. Oil& Gas Journal, 106(40):22-26. Rong, F., Victor, D.G., 2011.Coal liquefaction policy in China: Explaining the policy reversal since 2006. Energy Policy, 39(12):8175–8184. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.017 Sasol, 2002.Mind over matter - The Sasol Story: A half-century of technological innovation. 176 p. Available from: http://www.sasol.com Sasol, 2005.Unlocking the potential wealth of coal. Information brochure. Available from: http://www.sasol.com Schmitt, A., Singh, M., 2012, A quantitative analysis of disruption risk in a multi-echelon supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1):22-32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.004 Simangunsong, E., Hendry, L.C., Stevenson, M., 2012. Supply-chain uncertainty: a review and theoretical foundation for future research. International Journal of Production Research, 50(16): 4493–4523. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.613864 Singh, A.R., Mishra, P.K., Jain, R., 2012. Design of global supply chain network with operational risks. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, 60(1-4): 273–290. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3615-9 Smyth, R, Narayan, P.K., Shi, H., 2012. Inter-fuel substitution in the Chinese iron and steel sector. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(2): 525–532. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.021 SRES, 2000. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Available from: http://www.ipcc.ch/ Sovacool, B.K., Cooper, C., Parenteau, P., 2011. From a hard place to a rock: Questioning the energy security of a coal-based economy. Energy Policy, 39(8):4664–4670. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.065 Spath, P.L., Mann, M.K., Kerr, D.R., 1999. Life cycle assessment of coal-fired power production. Report from National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), NREL/TP-570-25119, June 1999. Available from:http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy99osti/25119.pdf SSEB, 2006. American energy security - building a bridge to energy independence and to a sustainable energy future. Report from the Southern States Energy Board (SSEB). Norcross, Georgia, July 2006. Available from: http://www.americanenergysecurity.org/studyrelease.html Steynberg, A.P., Nel., H.G., 2004. Clean coal conversion options using Fischer–Tropsch technology. Fuel, 86(6):765–770. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2003.09.023 Talberth, J., 2009. Economic feasibility of coal to liquids development in Alaska’s interior. Report prepared for the Northern Alaska Environmental Center. Available from: http://www.sustainable-economy.org/main/send_client_files?f=CTL%2520Comments.pdf Tavakoli, A., Sohrabi, M., Kargari, A., 2008. Application of Anderson–Schulz–Flory (ASF) equation in the product distribution of slurry phase FT synthesis with nanosized iron catalysts. Chemical Engineering Journal, 136(2–3):358–363. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.04.017 Tijmensen, M., Faaij, A., Hamelinck, C., van Hardeveld, M., 2002. Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer-Tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification. Biomass and Bioenergy, 23:129–152.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00037-5 Towill, D.R., Christopher, M., 2001. The supply chain strategy conundrum ~ to be Lean or Agile or to be Lean and Agile. Proceedings of the International Logistics Symposium, Salzburg, 2001, 3–12. UKERC, 2009. Global oil depletion: an assessment of the evidence for a near-term peak in global oil production. UK Energy Research Centre, London. Available from: http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/ US Department of Energy, 2011. Shale gas production subcommittee second ninety day report. Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, November 2011. Available from: http://energy.gov/downloads/90-day-second-report-shale-gas-production-secretary-energy-advisory-board US House, 2011. Chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing. United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy And Commerce, April 2011. Vallentin, D., 2008. Policy drivers and barriers for coal-to-liquids (CtL) technologies in the United States.Energy Policy, 36(8):3198–3211. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.032 Velasco, J., Lopez, L., Velásquez, M., Boutonnet, M., Cabrera, M., Järas, 2010. Gas to liquids: A technology for natural gas industrialization in Bolivia, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2(5), 222-228. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2010.10.001 Velocys. 2010. Microchannel GTL Technology: Demonstration through to Commercialisation, smi Gas to Liquids 2010, Hilton London Kensington 27 – 28 October 2010. Available from http://bdd30412c4435fb83871bb42c4abc74fdcc18bff.gripelements.com/downloads/oxfordcatalysts-velocys_gtl_update_oct10.pdf Velocys. 2011. Media and Press Overview. Available from http://velocys.com/ocgf01.php Wang, P., Jin, L., Liu, J., Zhu, S., Hu, H., 2011. Analysis of coal tar derived from pyrolysis at different atmospheres. Fuel, article in press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.06.041 Wei, H., Wong, C.W.Y., Lai, K., 2012. Linking interorganisational trustwith logistics information integration and partner cooperation under environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(2): 642–653. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.036 Williams, R., Larson, E., 2003. A comparison of direct and indirect liquefaction technologies for making fluid fuels from coal. Energy for Sustainable Development, 7:79–102. Williams, R., Larson, E., Liu, G.,Kreutz, T., 2009. Fischer–Tropsch fuels from coal and biomass: Strategic advantages of once-through (“polygeneration”) configurations. Energy Procedia, 1(1):4379-4386. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.252 Wood, D.A., Nwaoha, C., Towler, B.F., 2012. Gas-to-liquids (GTL): A review of an industry offering several routes for monetizing natural gas. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 9, 196–208. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2012.07.001 Woods, T., Wilkinson P. and McGill, C., 2002. Meeting the Gas Supply Challenge of the Next 20 Years Non-Traditional Gas Sources, Report prepared for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory -American Gas Foundation. Available at http://www.gasfoundation.org/ResearchStudies/GasSupplyStudyNonTraditional1Final.pdf World Coal Institute, 2006. Coal: liquid fuels. Report from 2006. Available from: http://www.worldcoal.org/ World Coal Association, 2012. What is coal seam methane? Available from:http://www.worldcoal.org/coal/coal-seam-methane Wu, J., Wang J., Cheng, Q., DeVallance D., 2011. Assessment of coal and biomass to liquid fuels in central Appalachia, USA, International Journal of Energy Research. 36(7):856–870. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.1838 Yang, J., Sun, Y., Tang, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, H., Tian, L., Wang, H., Zhang, Z.,Xiang, H., Li, H., 2006. Effect of magnesium promoter on iron-based catalyst for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 245(1-2):26-36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org10.1016/j.molcata.2005.08.051 Yurchak, S., 1988.Development of Mobil's fixed-bed Methanol-to-Gasoline (MTG) process. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 36, 251–272. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(09)60521-8 Zhang, Y., Xiang, W., Zhou, T., Lei, J., 2009. The development of coal liquefaction: opportunities and challenges. Coal Economy Research 8:6–8 (in Chinese) |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/46957 |