Doran, Justin and O'Leary, Eoin (2013): The Roles of R&D and networking for innovation by Irish and foreign-owned firms: evidence from the Irish CIS 2006-08.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_47291.pdf Download (409kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper provides an empirical test of Cohen and Levinthal’s (1990) hypothesis that undertaking R&D and collaborating with external networks together enhance the probability that firms engage in product and process innovation. Following Doran, Jordan and O’Leary (2013) we test this hypothesis separately for Irish and foreign-owned firms based in Ireland using data from the Irish Community Innovation Survey 2006-08. In order to control for potential endogeneity of the external networking variables a two-step procedure is used with predicted probabilities used as instruments in the estimated production functions. The results suggest that Irish-owned firms which engage in external networks with public knowledge sources while simultaneously undertaking R&D are more likely to innovate than firms which perform these two activities individually. However, Irish-owned firms which engage in backward networking for product and forward networking for process innovation while also undertaking R&D are less likely to be innovative, perhaps suggesting a substitution effect. These results for Irish-owned firms provide some support for Cohen and Levinthal’s (1990) hypothesis. However, foreign-owned firms seems to be largely self-contained, relying exclusively on intramural R&D for innovation as the external networking variables, both individually and when interacted with R&D, have no effect on innovation likelihood.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Roles of R&D and networking for innovation by Irish and foreign-owned firms: evidence from the Irish CIS 2006-08 |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Innovation, R&D, External Networking |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D |
Item ID: | 47291 |
Depositing User: | Mr Justin Doran |
Date Deposited: | 30 May 2013 17:31 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 08:22 |
References: | Barry and Bradley (1997). FDI and Trade: The Irish Host-Country Experience. Economic Journal Volume 107: 1798-1811. Bathelt, T., H. Malmberg and P. Maskell (2004). Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation. Progress in Human Geography Volume 28: 31-56. Birnie, J. E. and D. M. Hitchens (1998). Productivity and Income Per Capita Convergence in a Peripheral European Economy: The Irish Experience. Regional Studies Volume 32: 223-234. Central Statistics Office (2009). Community Innovation Survey: 2004-06.(Dublin, Ireland, Stationery Office). Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly Volume 35(1): 128-152. Colombo, M. and P. Garrone (1996). Technological cooperative agreements and firm's R&D intensity: A note on causality relations. Research Policy Volume 25: 923-932. Crépon, B., E. Duguest and J. Mairesse (1998). Research, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology Volume 7: 115-158. CSO (2010). Community Innovation Survey 2006-08.(Dublin, Stationary Office). David, P., B. Hall and A. Tool (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy Volume 29: 497 - 529. Doran, J., D. Jordan and E. O’Leary (2012). The Effects of National and International Interaction on Innovation: Evidence from the Irish CIS: 2004-6. Industry and Innovation Volume 19: 371-390. Doran, J., D. Jordan and E. O’Leary (2013). Effects of R&D spending on Innovation by Irish and Foreign-owned Businesses. Journal of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland Volume 165. Doran, J. and E. O’Leary (2011). External Interaction, Innovation and Productivity: An Application of the Innovation Value Chain for Ireland. Spatial Economic Analysis Volume 6: 199 - 222. EuroStat (2008). NACE Rev2 Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community.(Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities). Forfas (2010). Annual Business Survey of Economic Impact 2009.(Dublin, Forfas). Freel, M. (2003). Sectoral Patterns of Small Firm Innovation, Networking and Proximity. Research Policy Volume 32: 751-770. Gertler, M. and Y. Levitte (2005). Local Nodes in Global Networks: The Geography of Knowledge Flows in Biotechnology Innovation. Industry and Innovation Volume 12: 487-507. Godart, O., H. Gorg and A. Hanley (2012). Surviving the Crisis: Foreign Multinationals versus Domestic Firms. The World Economy Volume 35: 1305-1321. Greene, W. (2008). Econometric Analysis.(United States, Pearson-Prentice Hall). Griffith, R., E. Huergo, J. Mairesse and B. Peters (2006). Innovation and Productivity Across Four European Countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy Volume 22: 483-498. Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth. Bell Journal of Economics Volume 10: 92-116. Griliches, Z. (1992). The Search for R&D Spillovers. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics Volume 94: 29-47. Hall, B., F. Lotti and J. Mairesse (2009). Innovation and Productivity in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Italy. Small Business Economics Volume 33: 13-33. Hines Jr, J. R. (2010). Treasure Islands. Journal of Economic Perspectives Volume 24(4): 103-126. Howells, J. (2002). Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography. Urban Studies Volume 39: 871-884. Janz, N., H. Lööf and B. Peters (2003). Firm Level Innovation and Productivity: Is there a Common Story Across Countries? C.F.E.E. Research. Volume. Kline, J. and N. Rosenberg, Eds. (1986). An Overview of Innovation. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth.(Washington, National Academy Press). Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge Codification and the Geography of Innovation: The Case of Brescia Mechanical Cluster. Research Policy Volume 30: 1479 - 1500. Love, J. and M. Mansury (2007). External Linkages, R&D and Innovation Performance in US Business Services. Industry and Innovation Volume 14: 477-496. Lundvall, B. E., Ed. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. Technical Change and Economic Theory.(London, Pinter Publishers). McCann, P. and J. Simonen (2005). Innovation, Knowledge Spillovers and Local Labour Markets. Papers in Regional Science Volume 84: 465-485. Nonaka, I., R. Toyama and N. Konno, Eds. (2001). SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilisation.(Thousand Oaks, Ca, Sage). OECD (2005). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data.(France, OECD Publication). Oerlemans, L., M. Meeus and F. Boekema (1998). Do Networks Matter for Innovation? The Usefullness of the Economic Network Approach in Analysing Innovation. Journal of Economic and Social Geography Volume 89: 298-309. Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension.(London, Routledge and Kegan Paul). Romijin, H. and M. Albu (2002). Innovation, Networking and Proximity: Lessons from Small High Technology Firms in the UK. Regional Studies Volume 36: 81 - 86. Roper, S. (2001). Innovation, Networks and Plant Location: some evidence from Ireland. Regional Studies Volume 35: 215-228. Roper, S., J. Du and J. Love (2008). Modeling the innovation value chain. Research Policy Volume 37: 961-977. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/47291 |