A new look at the effect of the determinants of government institutions: A cross-sectional analysis

Kalonda-Kanyama, Isaac (2012): A new look at the effect of the determinants of government institutions: A cross-sectional analysis.

Abstract

Many papers have found mixed results in studying the relationship between institutional quality and some of its determinants, namely openness to trade, GDP per capita and economic globalization. This paper reexamines the relationship between government institutions and these factors. The main findings in this paper is that the three factors have a threshold effect on institutional quality. Specifically, there exists a significant nonlinear relationship between three measures of government institutions (government efficiency, political stability and the rule of law) and trade. Moreover, GDP per capita has a significant nonlinear effect on government effectiveness, political stability, regulatory quality, rule of law and control of corruption. Finally, there is a significant nonlinear relationship between each of the six measures of institutional quality and globalization. Some of the findings are robust to controlling for average IQ levels and regional grouping of countries while others are not. Specifically, the results show that the nonlinear relationship was robust only two measures of institutional quality both for trade and GDP per capita. Accounting for the level of IQ revealed a significant nonlinear relationship between Voice and Accountability and both trade and GDP per capita.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: governance, institutions, trade, globalization
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions

References

Acemoglu, D., Simon, J., and Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of com- parative development: An empirical investigation. The American Economic Review, 91(5):1369-1401.

Acemoglu, D., Simon, J., and Robinson, J. A. (2002). Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern income distribution. The Quarterly Journal of Econometrics, 118:1231-129.

Ades, A. and di Tella, R. (1999). Competition and corruption. American Economic Review, 89(4):982-993. Chong, A. and Zanforlin, L. (2000). Law tradition and institutional quality: Some empirical evidence. Journal of International Development, 12(8):1057-1068.

Easterly, W. (2001). The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists' Adventures and Mis- adventures in the Tropics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Easterly, W. and Levine, R. (2003). Tropics, germs, and crops: How endowments in_uence economic development. Journal of Monetary Economic, 50:3-39.

Frankel, J. A. and Romer, D. (1999). Does trade cause growth? The American Economic Review, 89(3):379-399.

Huther, J. and Shah, A. (2005). A simple measure of good governance. In Shah, A., editor, Public Services Delivery. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Islam, R. and Montenegro, C. E. (2002). What determines the quality of institutions? Background Paper for theWorld Development Report: Building Institutions for Mar- kets.

Kalonda-Kanyama, I. and Kodila-Tedika, O. (2012). Institutional quality: Does in- telligence matter? University of Kansas Working Papers Series in Theoretical and Applied Economics.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M. (2004). Governance matters III: Gover- nance indicators for 1996-2002. World bank policy research working paper no. 3106.

Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7(3):207-227.

La Porta, R., de Silanes, F. L., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15(1):222-279.

La_ont, J.-J. and N'Guessan, T. (1999). Competition and corruption in an agency relationship. Journal of Development Economics, 60:271_295.

Lynn, R. and Vanhanen, T. (2002). IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT.

Lynn, R. and Vanhanen, T. (2006). IQ and Global Inequality. Washington Summit Publishers, Augusta, GA.

Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., and Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9:131-165.

Rothstein, B. and Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2):165-190. Straub, S. (2000). Empirical determinants of good institutions: Do we know anything? Working paper no. 423, Inter-American Development Bank.

Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76:399-457.

Wei, S.-J. (2000). Natural openness and good government. National bureau of economic research working paper no. 7765.