Political dynasties and poverty: Resolving the “chicken or the egg” question

Mendoza, Ronald and Beja Jr, Edsel and Venida, Victor and Yap, David (2013): Political dynasties and poverty: Resolving the “chicken or the egg” question.

Abstract

"Political dynasty" refers to the situation wherein members of the same family are occupying elected positions either in sequence for the same position, or simultaneously across different positions. In the Philippines, political dynasties are prevalent in areas with more severe poverty. Two explanations for this situation have been proposed: poverty brings about political dynasties, or political dynasties engender poverty. These arguments suggest that the relationship between political dynasties and poverty can be treated as an empirical question. (So which one is the chicken, and which one is the egg?) In order to examine the direction of causality between political dynasties and poverty, this paper turns to provincial-level data from the Philippines and develops novel metrics on political dynasties: the shares of total positions occupied by dynastic politicians, of the largest dynastic clan as regards total positions, and of dynastic concentration inspired by the industrial concentration literature. To address endogeneity, instrumental variables for poverty are used, consisting of indicators for rainfall and the geographical distance to Manila (the Capital). The results we find are striking: poverty entrenches political dynasties; education appears to have no bearing on political dynasties; and the media affect only the largest political dynasties. There is less evidence that political dynasties bring about poverty.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: democracy; political dynasty; inclusive growth; political equality; social inequality
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I39 - Other; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy

References

Acemoglu, D. and J. Robinson. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Asako, Y., T. Iida, T. Matsubayashi, and M. Ueda. 2010. “Dynastic legislators: Theory and evidence from Japan.” Mimeo.

Balisacan, A. and N. Fuwa. 2004. “Going beyond cross-country averages: Growth, inequality and poverty reduction in the Philippines.” World Development 32(11):1891-907.

Beckett, J. 1994. “Political families and family politics among the Muslim Maguindanaon of Cotabato.” In A. McCoy, Ed., An Anarchy of Families:State and Family in the Philippines. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Bentley, G. 1994. “Mohamad Ali Dimaporo: A modern Maranao Datu.” In A. McCoy, Ed., An Anarchy of Families:State and Family in the Philippines. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Capuno, J., S. Quimbo, A. Kraft, C. Tan and V. Fabella. 2012. “The effects of term limits and yardstick competition on local government provision of health insurance and other public services: The Philippine case.” University of the Philippines School of Economics Discussion Paper 2012-01.

Clarke,G. and M.Sison. 2003. “Voices from the top of the pile: Elite perceptions of poverty and the poor in the Philippines.” Development and Change 34(2):215-242.

Coronel, S. 1998. “Monopoly.” In S.Coronel, Ed., Pork and Other Perks. Manila: Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism.

Coronel, S. 2007. The Seven Ms of Dynasty Building.

Cullinane, M. 1994. “Patron as client: Warlord politics and the Duranos in Danao.” In A.McCoy, Ed., An Anarchy of Families:State and Family in the Philippines. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Curato, N. 2012. “What is wrong with political dynasties?” Opinion, GMA News Online.

Dal Bo, E., P. Dal Bo and J. Snyder. 2009. "Political Dynasties." Review of Economic Studies 76(1):115-142.

David, R. 2013. “Dynasties and Democracy.” Opinion, Philippine Daily Inquirer.

Gerring, J., P. Bond, W. Barndt, and C. Moreno. 2005. “Democracy and Economic Growth: A Historical Perspective”. World Politics 57(3): 323-364.

Hutchcroft, P. and J. Rocamora.2003. “Strong demands and weak institutions: The origins and evolution of the democratic deficit in the Philippines.” Journal of East Asian Studies 3(2003):259-292.

Lacey, R. 1983. Aristocrats. London: Hutchinson and Co.

Manacsa, R. and A. Tan. 2005. “Manufacturing Parties.” Party Politics 11(6):748-765.

McCoy, A. 1994a. “Rent-seeking families and the Philippine state: A history of the Lopez family.” In A. McCoy, Ed., An Anarchy of Families:State and Family in the Philippines. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

McCoy, A., Ed.1994b. An Anarchy of Families:State and Family in the Philippines. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Mendoza, R., E. Beja, V. Venida and D. Yap. 2012. “Inequality in democracy: Insights from an empirical analysis of political dynasties in the 15th Philippine Congress.” Philippine Political Science Journal 33(2):132-145.

Mendoza, R. 2012. “Dynasties in Democracies: The Political Side of Inequality.” VoxEU.org.

Parreño, E. 1998. “Pork.” In Sheila Coronel, Ed., Pork and Other Perks: Corruption and Governance in the Philippines. Pasig: Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

Querubin, P. 2010. “Family and Politics: Dynastic Persistence in the Philippines.” Mimeo. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Querubin, P. 2011. “Political Reform and Elite Persistence: Term Limits and Political Dynasties in the Philippines.” Mimeo. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Ravanilla, N. 2012. “Passing pork to patrons: Legislator-Mayor linkage of distributive politics in the Philippines.” Mimeo. University of Michigan.

Rocamora, J. 1998. Pork and Other Perks: Corruption and Governance in the Philippines Edited by Sheila Coronel. Pasig: Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism.

Rodrik, D. 2007. One Economics Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions and Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rossi, M. 2009. “The Causes of Political Dynasties in Democratic Countries.” Mimeo.

Schaffer, F.C. 2002. “Disciplinary reactions: Alienation and the reform of vote buying in the Philippines.” Mimeo.

Sidel, J. 1997. “Philippine Politics in Town, District, and Province: Bossism in Cavite and Cebu”. Journal of Asian Studies 56(4): 947-966.

Sidel, J. 1994. “Walking in the shadow of the big man: Justiniano Montano and failed dynasty building in Cavite, 1935-1972.” In A. McCoy, Ed., An Anarchy of Families:State and Family in the Philippines. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Solon, O, R. Fabella, and J. Capuno.2009. “Is Local Development Good Politics? Local Government Expenditures and the Re-Election of Governors in the Philippines in the 1990s”. Asian Journal of Political Science 17(3): 265-284.

Solt, F. 2008. “Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement”. American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 48-60.

Teehankee, J. 2007. And the Clans Play On. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism.