Beyond talking the talk: towards a critical pluralist practice

Freeman, Alan and Kliman, Andrew (2005): Beyond talking the talk: towards a critical pluralist practice. Published in: Post-Autistic Economics Review No. 40 (1 December 2006): pp. 26-53.

Abstract

This is a pre-publication version of a paper that appeared in Post-Autistic Economics Review No. 40. Please cite it as Freeman, A. and Andrew Kliman. 2006. ‘Beyond Talking the Talk: Towards a Critical Pluralist Practice”. Post-autistic economics review issue no. 40, 1 December 2006, article 4, pp.26-53.

This paper, initially presented at the AHE 2005 conference, was one of the earliest to argue that pluralism in economics requires formal rules of conduct to guarantee pluralism in research. These should provide for transparent and professional standards for research, presentation and editorial judgement.

The guiding principle of this reform is what we term critical pluralism. There are two key ideas in this. The first is that truth, or progress towards it, arises only if empirical reality is tested against a multiplicity of theoretical explanations of that reality. Pluralism is thus not a normative or ethically desirable adjunct to science but a necessary prerequisite to producing valid knowledge. Critical pluralism would, therefore, impose on the researcher the obligation to

• engage with, and critically examine, explanations alternative to her own;

• clearly state the alternative presuppositions which differentiate her own explanation of observed reality from the alternatives considered;

• clearly identify the evidence in support of her own conclusion

• clearly identify the evidence that supports the researcher’s interpretation of the alternative views against which she tests her conclusions, in order to provide for a fair test.

The article concludes with a statement of the guidelines of the International Working Group on Value Theory (IWGVT) for pluralistic writing in economics.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Pluralism, IWGVT, Economics
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches

References

Blustein, P (2004), IMF Says Its Policies Crippled Argentina: Internal Audit Finds Warnings Were Ignored, Washington Post July 30 2004 < http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25824-2004Jul29.html >)

Card, David E. and Krueger, Alan B. (1995). Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of the Minimum Wage. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

Cassidy, John (1997), ‘The Return of Karl Marx’, The New Yorker, 20 & 27 October, pp. 248ff.

Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Dow, Sheila C. (1985). Macroeconomic Thought: A Methodological Approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Dow, Sheila C. (1996). The Methodology of Macroeconomic Thought. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Duménil, Gérard (1980), De la Valeur aux Prix de Production. Une Réinterprétation de la Transformation, Paris: Economica

Foley, Duncan K. (1997). Review of Marx and Non-equilibrium Economics, Eastern Economic Review 7.

Foley, Duncan K (1982), ‘The Value of Money, the Value of Labour Power and the Marxian Transformation Problem’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 14(2).

Foley, Duncan K (1983), ‘Beyond the Transformation Riddle: A Labor Theory of Value’, Science and Society 47:4, Winter, pp427 450.

Freeman, Alan (2004). The Case for Simplicity: A paradigm for the political economy of the 21st century. In Freeman, Alan; Kliman, Andrew; and Wells, Julian (eds.), The New Value Controversy and the Foundations of Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Freeman, Alan (2007): Heavens Above: What Equilibrium Means for Economics. Forthcoming in Mosini, V. (ed) (2007) Equilibrium in Economics: Scope and Limits, London: Routledge

Freeman, Alan and Carchedi, Guglielmo (eds.) (1996), Marx and Non-equilibrium Economics.

Freeman, Alan; Kliman, Andrew; and Wells, Julian (eds.) (2004): The New Value Controversy and the Foundations of Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Freud, Sigmund (1938). The Psychopathology of Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

http://copejournal.org , the website of Critique of Political Economy

Journal 23:4.

Kliman, Andrew (2006). Reclaiming Marx’s “Capital”: Beyond the Transformation Problem and Other Myths of Inconsistency. Forthcoming. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Manning, Alan (2003) Monopsony in Motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press

Martin, Brian (1998). Strategies for Dissenting Scientists, Journal of Scientific Exploration 12:4, pp. 605-16.

Okishio, Nobuo (1961). Technical Changes and the Rate of Profit, Kobe University Economic

Ormerod, Paul (1994). The Death of Economics. London: Faber and Faber.

Ramos-Martínez, A. and Rodríguez-Herrera, A. (1993), ‘The transformation of values into prices of production, luxury articles and commercial capital’, Plusvalore, No. 13, Milano.

Reder, Melvin W. (1982). Chicago Economics: Permanence and Change. Journal of Economic Literature 20:1, pp. 1-38.

Uglow, Jenny (2002). The Lunar Men: The Friends Who Made the Future. London: Faber and Faber.

UK Low Pay Commission (2005) “National Minimum Wage: Low Pay Commission Report 2005” London: the Stationery Office, cm 6475

www.iwgvt.org, the website of the International Working Group on Value Theory (IWGVT)

Wolff, R., Roberts, B. and Callari, A. (l982), ‘Marx’s (not Ricardo’s) “Transformation Problem”: A Radical Reconceptualization’, History of Political Economy, Vol 14 No. 4., pp 564-582.