Francesco, Gastaldi and Lucia, Quaglino and Carlo, Stagnaro (2012): Il trasporto pubblico locale e la concorrenza. Cambiare paradigma per salvare il servizio: il caso ligure. Published in: IBL Special Report (23 July 2012)
Preview |
PDF
IBL-Special_Report-TPL.pdf Download (941kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Local Public Transportation (LPT) in Italy is usually managed through inhouse companies owned by local governments. In the past few years a wave of reforms has invested the sector, with some regions trying to increase the companies' size. This paper provides an extensive review of the literature, showing that there is little evidence of scale and scope economies beyond a relatively small size. Moreover, there is some evidence that competition in the market, as well as competition for the market, is possible, if the service is fragmented by distinguishing between the "public" service and the potentially profitable part of the service. The paper examines the situation of the Liguria region in Italy, where the regional government is pushing for an integration of the 5 existing companies. The paper argues that an integration is likely to push costs upwards and suggests to privatize the companies, while liberalizing the service, in order to increase the efficiency.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Il trasporto pubblico locale e la concorrenza. Cambiare paradigma per salvare il servizio: il caso ligure. |
English Title: | Local Public Transportation and Competition. Changing Paradigm to Save the Service: The Case of Liguria. |
Language: | Italian |
Keywords: | local public transportation, liberalization, privatization, italy, liguria |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D42 - Monopoly H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H42 - Publicly Provided Private Goods H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H71 - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L32 - Public Enterprises ; Public-Private Enterprises L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L92 - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation |
Item ID: | 49464 |
Depositing User: | Dr Carlo Stagnaro |
Date Deposited: | 05 Sep 2013 07:22 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 20:08 |
References: | Alchian A. (1965), Some Economics of Property Rights, Il Politico no. 30, pp. 816-29. "Amt, sempre più 'portoghesi'. Senza biglietto il 10% dei passeggeri", Repubblica Genova, 24 aprile 2012. Andersen B. (1992), Factors affecting European privatization and deregulation policies in local public transport: the evidence from Scandinavia, Transpn. Res.-A, Vol. 26A, No. 2, pp. 179-191. ARPA Lombardia (2006), La qualità dell’aria in Lombardia, http://www.collegioborromeo.it/files/2005-06/inquinamento/inquinamento_giudici_15-5-06.pdf Arrigo U. (2007), Organizzazione e (mancata) riforma del trasporto pubblico locale, IBL Briefing Paper no. 44. Arrigo U., Ferri V. (2012), La separazione delle reti ferroviarie. Insegnamenti per l'Italia dalle riforme di Svezia e Gran Bretagna, IBL Special Report. Axteria (2007), Analisi del sistema di Trasporto pubblico locale in Liguria e definizione delle linee guida per lo sviluppo, su www.regione.liguria.it Baumol W. J., Panzar J., Willig R. D. (1982), Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. Bajari P., McMillan R., Tadelis S. (2009), Auctions versus negotiations in procurement: an empirical analysis, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 25, 372–99. Bentivogli C., Cullino R., Del Colle D.M. (2008), Regolamentazione ed efficienza del trasporto pubblico locale: i divari regionali, Questioni di Economia e Finanza no. 20, Occasional paper. Berechman J. (1983), Analysis of costs, economies of scale and factor demand in bus transit, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy no. 17, pp. 1-16. Berechman P. (1987), Cost Structure and Production Technology in Transit: An Application to Israeli Bus Transit Sector, Regional Science and Urban Economics no. 17, pp. 519-534. Berechman P., Giuliano G. (1984), Analysis of the Costs Structure of an Urban Transit Property, Transportation Research no. 18, pp. 277-287. Boardman A., Vining A. (1989) Ownership and performance in competitive environments: a comparison of the performance of private, mixed, and stateowned enterprises, Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 1–33. Boitani A., Cambini C. (2004), Le gare per i servizi di trasporto locale in Europa e in Italia: molto rumore per nulla?, Working Paper no. 1, Hermes Ricerche. Boitani A., Cambini C. (2006), To bid or not to bid, this is the question: the Italian experience in competitive tendering for local bus services, European Transport no. 33, pp. 41-53. Boitani A., Nicolini M., Scarpa C. (2013), Do competition and ownership matter? Evidence from local public transport in Europe, Applied Economics, 45:11, 1419-1434, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.617702. Boitani A., Panteghini P., Pellegrini L., Ponti M., Scarpa C. (2005), Come far ripartire le liberalizzazioni nei servizi, in Boeri T., Faini R., Ichino A., Pisauto G., Scarpa C., Oltre il declino, Il Mulino, Bologna. Bonfiglioli S. (a cura di) (2004), La città del tempo e la cultura del progetto, Urbanistica n. 125, pp. 61-89. Boycko M., Shleifer A., Vishny R. W. (1996), A theory of privatization, Economic Journal, 106, 309–19. Brandt T., Schulten T. (2007), Liberalisation and privatisation of public services and the impact on labour relations: A comparative view from six countries in the postal, hospital, local public transport and electricity sectors, Pique. Button K., O’Donnel K. H. (1985), An Examination of the Cost Structures Associated with Providing Urban Bus Services, Scottish Journal of Political Economy no. 32, pp. 67-81. Caves D. W., Christensen L. R. (1988), The Importance of Economies of Scale, Capacity Utilization and Density in Explaining Inter-Industry Differences in Productivity Growth, The Logistic and Transportation Review no. 2, pp. 3-32. Chang K.,P., Kao P. H. (1992), The Relative Efficiencyof Public versus Private Municipal BusCompanies: An Application of data envelopment Analysis, Journal of Productivity Analysis no. 3, pp. 67-84. Dalen D. M., Gomez-Lobo A. (1997), Cost Functions in Regulated Industries Characterized by ìAsymmetric Information, European Economic Review no. 41(3-5), pp. 935-42. Dalen D. M., Gomez-Lobo A. (1995), Regulation and Incentive Contracts: An Empirical Investigation of the Norwegian Bus Transport Industry, Institute for Fiscal Studies Working Paper, London. De Borger B. (1984), Cost and Productivity in Regional Bus Transportation: The Case of Belgium Case Study, Journal of Industrial Economics no. 37, pp. 35-54. Eckel C., Vining A. (1985) Elements of a theory of mixed enterprise, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 32, 82–94. Fabbri D. (1996), La Stima di Frontiere di Costo nel Trasporto Pubblico Locale: una Rassegna e un’Applicazione, Economia Pubblica no. 3, pp. 55-94. Farsi M., Fetz A., Filippini M. (2007), Economies of scale and scope in local public transportation, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Volume 41, Part 3, pp. 345–361 Fazioli R. (1993), L'offerta di servizi pubblici soggetti a riserva: l'efficienza dell'offerta pubblica e privata a confronto. Il caso del trasporto pubblico regionale su strada, Quaderni CIFREL n. 2, Università di Ferrara. Fazioli R., Filippini M., Prioni P. (1993), Cost Structure and Efficiency of Local Public Transport: The Case of Emilia Romagna Bus Companies, International Journal of Transport Economics no. 20(3), pp. 305-24. Ferrar C., Sanguinetti S., Tei A. (2010), Indagine sulla efficienza tecnica di un campione di aziende che operano servizi di Tpl, Centro di ricerca interuniversitario Governance of Urban Policies - Go-UP, rapporto commissionato dall'Autorità per i servizi pubblici locali del comune di Genova. Filippini M., Maggi R., Prioni P. (1992), Inefficiency in a Regulated Industry: The Case of the Swiss Regional Bus Companies, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics no. 63, pp. 437-455. Filippini M., Prioni P. (1993), Is scale and cost inefficiency in the Swiss bus industry a regulatory problem? Evidence from a frontier cost approach, paper presentato alla 38° Conferenza Internazionale della Applied Econometrics Association, Atene. Filippini M., Prioni P. (2005), The influence of ownership on the cost of bus service provision in Switzerland – an empirical investigation, Applied Economics, 35, 683–90. Fraquelli G., Piacenza M., Abrate G. (2001), Il trasporto pubblico locale in Italia: variabili esplicative dei divari di costo per le imprese, Economia e Politica Industriale, 111, pp. 51-81. Gagnepain P. (1998), Structures Productives de l'Industrie du Transport Urbain et Effets des Schemas Reglementaires, Economie et Prevision no. 135, pp. 95-107. Gagnepain P., Ivaldi M. (1998), Stochastic Frontiers and Asymmetric Information Models, mimeo, GREMAQ - IDEI, Université des Sciences Sociales de Toulouse, France. Galiano V., "Amt quasi fallita per colpa del comune", Il Secolo XIX, 29 marzo 2011. Grillo D., "Amt, tregua fragile. Gli autisti: nessun aumento di orario", Il Secolo XIX, 13 giugno 2012. Grillo D., "Nuovo piano Amt: 600 in meno", Il Secolo XIX, 4 maggio 2011. Hart O., Shleifer A., Vishny R. W. (1997), The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prisons, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1127–61. Hensher D. A., Stanley J. (2008), Transacting under a performance-based contract: the role of negotiation and competitive tendering, Transportation Research A, 42, 1143–51. Hensher D. A., Wallis I. P. (2005), Competitive Tendering as a Contracting Mechanism for Subsidising Transport: The Bus Experience, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 39(3), pp. 295-322. IBL (2012), Indice delle Liberalizzazioni, IBL Libri, Torino. IBL (2011), Uscire dalla crisi. Un'agenda di privatizzazioni, IBL Policy Paper. Ichino P. (2011), Inchiesta sul lavoro, Milano, Mondadori. Ivaldi M. (1997), Performance Differential between Public and Private Firms: A Survey of Empirical Tests, mimeo, IDEI, Université des Sciences Sociales de Toulouse, France. Jørgensen F., Pedersen P. A., Volden R. (1997), Estimating the Efficiency in the Norwegian Bus Industry from Stochastic Cost Frontier Models, Transportation no. 24, pp. 421-433. Kerstens K. (1996), Technical Efficiency measurement and Explanation of French urban Transit Companies Transportation Research, no. 30, pp. 341-452. Klemperer P. (1999), Auction theory: A guide to the literature, CEPR Discussion Paper, n. 2163. Levaggi R. (1994), Parametric and Non-Parametric Approach to Efficiency: The Case of Urban Transport in Italy, Studi Economici no. 49(53), pp. 67-88. Martinotti G. (1993), Metropoli. La nuova morfologia sociale della città, Il Mulino, Bologna Mareggi M. (2002), Innovation in Urban Policy: the Experience of Italian Urban Time Policies, Planning Theory & Practices, vol. 3, n. 2, pp. 173-194. Mareggi M. (2011), Ritmi urbani, Maggioli Editore, Rimini. Megginson W. L., Netter J. M. (2001), From State to Market: a Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization, Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), pp. 321–389. Mietta G., "Altri tagli in vista per Amt", Il Sole 24 Ore Nord Ovest, 21 settembre 2011. Mostacci E., Romeo G. (2006), La regolamentazione del trasporto pubblico locale in Europa: un’analisi comparata, I Servizi pubblici negli ordinamenti europei. O’Toole R. (2008), Does Rail Transit Save Energy or Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions?, Cato Institute Policy Analysis no. 615. O’Toole R. (2010), Fixing Transit. The Case for Privatization, Policy Analysis no. 670. Obeng K. (1984), The Economics of Bus Transit Operation, The Logistic and Transportation Review no. 20, pp. 45-65. Obeng K., Azam G. (1997), Type of management and subsidy-induced allocative distorsions in urban transit firms. A time series approach, Journal of transport economics and policy, pp. 193-290. Odeck J., Sunde O. (2001), The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Bus Companies?, International Conference Series on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport. OECD (2003), Privatising State-owned Enterprises, Parigi, Oecd. Oltremare (2012), Verso un piano di risanamento di Amt, Fondazione Oltremare, gennaio 2012. Orlandi M., “La Regione finanzia il trasporto pubblico locale per i primi sei mesi del 2012”, Toscana Notizie, http://toscana-notizie.it/blog/2012/01/26/la-regione-finanzia-il-trasporto-pubblico-locale-per-i-primi-sei-mesi-del-2012/ Ottoz E., Fornengo G., Di Giacomo M. (2009), The influence of ownership on the cost of bus service provision: an example from Italy, Applied Economics, 41, 337–49. Perry J., L., Babitsky T. T. (1986), Comparative Performance in Urban Bus Transit: Assessing Privatization Strategies, Public Administration Review no. 46, pp. 57-66. Piacenza M. (2001), Productive Structure, Cost Efficiency and Incentives in the Local Public Transport: A Survey of Theoretical and Empirical Issues, Working Paper no. 1. Pieri C., “Amt: tagli a linee collinari e notturne”, genova.mentelocale.it, http://genova.mentelocale.it/29601-amt-tagli-a-linee-collinari-e-notturne/ Pina V., Torres L. (2001), Analysis of the efficiency of local government delivery. An application to urban public transport, Transportation Research part A no. 35, pp.. 929-944. Ponti M., Ramella F. (2010), Ottavo Rapporto sul processo di liberalizzazione della società italiana. Trasporto collettivo locale a lezione di inglese, Società libera, http://www.societalibera.org Ramella F. (2011), Ecopass. Il fallimento annunciato e le riforme possibili, IBL Briefing Paper no.104. Regione Liguria, "Verso l'azienda unica dei trasporti", Focus, 22 marzo 2012 Roy W., Yvrande-Billon A. (2007), Ownership, Contractual Practices and Technical Efficiency: The Case of Urban Public Transport in France, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Volume 41, Part 2, pp. 257–282. Santilli G., "Dalla concorrenza risorse per crescere e risanare i servizi pubblici locali", Il Sole 24 Ore, 26 gennaio 2012. Scarpa C., Bianchi P., Bortolotti B., Pellizzola L. (2009), Comuni Spa. Il capitalismo municipale in Italia, Bologna, Il Mulino. Sculli R., "La sorella dell'ad e le consulenze scatenano la rissa", Il Secolo XIX, 3 aprile 2012. Sculli R., "Martinetto lascia e spara a zero: clima irrespirabile e politici inadeguati", Il Secolo XIX, 8 maggio 2012. Sculli R., "Sciopero Amt, gli autisti invadono la Regione", Il Secolo XIX, 17 gennaio 2012. Schmidt K. M. (1996), Incomplete Contracts and Privatization, European Economic Review no. 40, pp. 569–79. Stagnaro C. (2006), Nessun pasto è gratis. Perché è giusto istituire un ticket d'accesso alle grandi città, IBL Focus no.34. Thiry B., Lawarree J. (1987), Productivité, coût et caracteristiques technologiques des sociétés belges de transport urbain, Annales de l’économie publique, sociale et coopérative no. 4, pp. 368-396. Tirole J. (1994), The Internal Organization of Government, Oxford Economic Papers no. 46, pp. 1–29. Vickers J., Yarrow G. (1991), Economic perspectives on privatization, Journal of Economic Perspectives no. 5, pp. 111–32. Viton P. (1981), A Translog Cost Function for Urban Bus Transport, Journal of Industrial Economics no. 29, pp. 287-304. Viton P. A., (1997), Technical efficiency in Multi-Mode Bus Transit: a Production Frontier Analysis, Transportation Research no. B31, pp. 23-39. Williams M., Dalal A. (1981), Estimation of the Elasticity of Factor Substitution in Urban Bus Transportation: A Cost Function Approach, Journal of regional Science no. 21, pp. 263-275. Windle R. J. (1988), Transit Policy and the Cost Structure of Urban Bus Transportation, in J. S. Dogson and N. Topham eds., Bus Deregulation and Privatization, Averbury: Aldershot, 1988. Winston C. (2010), "Urban Transit", in Last Exit. Privatization and Deregulation of the US Transportation System, Washington, DC, The Brookings Institution, pp.61-75. Wolak F. A. (1994), An Econometric Analysis of the Asymmetric Information Regulator-Utility Interaction, Annales d’Economie et de Statistiques no. 34, pp. 13-69. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/49464 |