Ferreira-Lopes, Alexandra and Sousa, Cândida and Carvalho, Helena and Crespo, Nuno (2013): Trade Protectionism and Intra-industry Trade: A USA - EU Comparison.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_49379.pdf Download (404kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The aim of this work is to find patterns for products included in the customs tariffs of the USA and the EU (composed of over 5000 products disaggregated at the 6 digit-level) which share similarities, defined by a set of international trade variables, namely the index of revealed comparative advantages (RCA), the Grubel-Lloyd index, and other indicators of international trade. There is a recent strand in the literature advancing a theory that links the degree of intra-industry trade with the level of protectionism. In order to test this theory we use cluster analysis as a method of data analysis and the Grubel-Lloyd index as a classification variable between groups. For each of the analyzed regions we obtain four different groups. Thereafter each of these four clusters are further characterized with the help of the other international trade indicators and the tariffs. Finally, we establish a comparison between the two regions by examining possible differences and similarities. The results show a significant difference in the tariffs applied between the USA and the EU, with the USA presenting a lower level of protectionism. Additionally, the results for the USA show a positive relationship between the degree of intra-industry trade and a lower level of protectionism, while for the EU the results are not conclusive.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Trade Protectionism and Intra-industry Trade: A USA - EU Comparison |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Trade Policy, Customs Tariff, USA, EU, Intra-industry Trade, Cluster Analysis |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C38 - Classification Methods ; Cluster Analysis ; Principal Components ; Factor Models F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade |
Item ID: | 49482 |
Depositing User: | Alexandra Ferreira-Lopes |
Date Deposited: | 04 Sep 2013 04:33 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 00:52 |
References: | 1. Baldwin, R. (1985), The Political Economy of USA Trade Policy, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press. 2. Bohara, A. K.; W. H. Kaempfer (1991), "A Test of Tariff Endogeneity in the United States", American Economic Review 81 (4): 952 - 960, March. 3. Bouët, A.; Y. Decreux; L. Fontagné; S. Jean; D. Laborde (2008), "Assessing Applied Protection across the World", Review of International Economics 16 (5): 850 - 863. 4. Brülhart, M.; R. J. R. Elliot (1998), "Adjustment to the European Single Market: Inferences from Intraindustry Trade Patterns", Journal of Economic Studies 25 (3): 225 - 247. 5. Cipollina, M.; L. Salvatici (2008), "Measuring Protection: Mission Impossible?", Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (3): 577 - 616, July. 6. Clark, D. P. (2002), "Intra-Industry Specialization and the North American Free Trade Agreement", The International Trade Journal 16 (4): 393 - 411. 7. Evans, C. L. (2007), "National Border Effects: Location, Not Nationality, Matters", Review of International Economics 15 (2): 347 - 369. 8. Fontagné, L.; T. Mayer; S. Zignago (2005), "Trade in the Triad: How Easy is the Access to Large Markets?", Canadian Journal of Economics 38 (4): 1401 - 1430. 9. Foster, N.; R. Stehrer (2011), "Preferential Trade Agreements and the Structure of International Trade", Review of World Economics 147: 385 - 409. 10. Greenaway, D.; C. Milner (1988), "Intra-Industry Trade and the Shifting of Protection Across Sectors", European Economic Review 32 (4): 927 - 945. 11. Greenaway, D.; R. C. Hine (1991), "Intra-Industry Specialization, Trade Expansion and Adjustment in the European Economic Space", Journal of Common Market Studies 29 (6): 603 - 622, December. 12. Gros, D. (1987), "Protectionism in a Framework with Intra-Industry Trade - Tariffs, Retaliation, and Welfare Loss", Staff Papers - International Monetary Fund 34 (1): 86 - 114, March. 13. Guimbard, H.; S. Jean; M. Mimouni; X. Pichot (2012), "MAcMap-HS6 2007, an exhaustive and consistent measure of applied protection in 2007", CEPII WP No. 2012-10. 14. Hair, J.; R. Anderson; R. Tatham; W. Black (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th Edition, Upper Saddle River, Pearson International Edition. 15. Hufbauer, G. C.; K. A. Elliot (1994), Measuring the Costs of Protection in the United States, Washington D.C., Institute for International Economics. 16. JØrgensen, J. G.; P. J. H. Schröder (2005), "Welfare-ranking Ad valorem and Specific Tariffs under Monopolistic Competition", Canadian Journal of Economics 38 (1): 228 - 241, February. 17. Magee, S. P.; W. A. Brock; L. Young (1989), Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory: Political Economy in General Equilibrium, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 18. Marvel, H. P.; J. R. Edward (1987), "Intraindustry Trade: Sources and Effects on Protection", Journal of Political Economy 95 (6): 1278 - 1291. 19. Menon, J.; P. B. Dixon (1996), "Regional Trading Agreements and Intra-Industry Trade", Journal of Economic Integration 11 (1): 1 - 20. 20. Messerlin, P. (2001), Measuring the Costs of Protection in Europe: European Commercial Policy in the 2000s, Washington, D.C., Institute for International Economics. 21. Peneder, M. (2001), Entrepreneurial Competition and Industrial Location, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK. 22. Peneder, M. (2003), "Industry Classifications: Aim, Scope and Techniques", Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 3 (1-2): 109-129. 23. Ratnayake, R.; S. Jayasuriya (1991), "Intraindustry Trade and Protection: Which Way does the Causality Go?", Economics Letters 36 (1): 71 - 76. 24. Vogiatzoglou, K. (2006), "Patterns and Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade within NAFTA"; Global Business and Economics Review 8 (3-4): 262 - 279. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/49482 |