The Problem of Methodological Pluralism in Ecological Economics

Lo, Alex (2014): The Problem of Methodological Pluralism in Ecological Economics.

Abstract

Methodological pluralism advocates balanced consideration of multiple research methods. The concept rests upon the necessity of choice in the absence of conclusive principles to guide the preference of method. Ecological economics, however, appears to be engaging in a different conception creating confusion as to the scope for intellectual openness. This paper offers clarifications for this concept and a critique. Ecological economics advances a coherent theory crafted along its biophysical worldview and moral commitments. These imperatives guide the choice of method and favour a reduced range of methodological possibilities to the exclusion of neoclassical economic options. If ecological economics is seen as an ideological opposite of neoclassical economics, it would need a selective methodological strategy rather than maintaining methodological diversity. Maintaining diversity may erode the basis of its heterodox criticisms by requiring openness to the orthodox alternatives. Ecological economics has shown difficulty in sustaining its long-standing pluralist commitments while increasingly seeking clear differentiation from its monolithic “enemy”.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Methodological pluralism; methodological diversity; value pluralism; ecological economics; neoclassical economics.
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B40 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology

References

Anderson, B., M'Gonigle, M., 2012. Does ecological economics have a future?: Contradiction and reinvention in the age of climate change. Ecological Economics 84, 37-48.

Baumgärtner, S., Becker, C., Frank, K., Müller, B., Quaas, M., 2008. Relating the philosophy and practice of ecological economics: The role of concepts, models, and case studies in inter- and transdisciplinary sustainability research. Ecological Economics 67, 384-393.

Baumgärtner, S., Quaas, M., 2009. Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability under uncertainty. Ecological Economics 68, 2008-2020.

Bergström, S., 1993. Value standards in sub-sustainable development: On limits of ecological economics. Ecological Applications 7, 1-18.

Bigo, V., Negru, I., 2008. From Fragmentation to Ontologically Reflexive Pluralism. Journal of Philosophical Economics 1, 127-150.

Caldwell, B., 1997. Comment: Varieties of pluralism in: Salanti, A., Screpanti, E. (Eds.), Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.

Caldwell, B.J., 1982. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century George Allen & Unwin, London.

Caldwell, B.J., 1989. Post-Keynesian methodology: An assessment. Review of Political Economy 1, 43-64.

Common, M., 1995. Sustainability and Policy: Limits to Economics Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Common, M., Perrings, C., 1992. Towards an ecological economics of sustainability. Ecological Economics 6, 7-34. Costanza, R., 1991. Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability Columbia University Press, New York.

Costanza, R., 1996. Ecological economics: Reintegrating the study of humans and nature. Ecological Applications 6, 978-990.

Costanza, R., 2000. Social goals and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosystems 3, 4-10.

Costanza, R., Cumberland, J., Daly, H., Goodland, R., Norgaard, R., 1997a. An Introduction to Ecological Economics St. Lucie Press Boca Raton, Florida.

Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., Groot, R.d., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeen, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruele, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., Belt, M.v.d., 1997b. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253-260.

Costanza, R., Daly, H.E., 1987. Toward an ecological economics. Ecologial Modelling 38, 1-7.

Daly, H.E., 1987. The economic growth debate: What some economists have learned but many have not. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14, 323-336.

Daly, H.E., 1991. Steady-State Economics: Second Edition with New Essays. Island Press, Washington D.C.

Daly, H.E., 1996. Beyond Growth: the Economics of Sustainable Development Beacon Press, Boston.

Daly, H.E., 1999. Ecological Economics and the Ecology of Economics: Essays in Criticism Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.

Daly, H.E., Farley, J., 2011. Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications 2nd ed. Island Press, Washington.

De Langhe, R., 2010. How monist is heterodoxy? Cambridge Journal of Economics 34, 793-805.

Douai, A., 2009. Value theory in ecological economics: The contribution of a political economy of wealth. Environmental Values 18, 257-284.

Dow, S.C., 1996. The Methodology of Macroeconomic Thought: A Conceptual Analysis of Schools of Thought in Economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

Dow, S.C., 1997. Methodological pluralism and pluralism of method, in: Salanti, A., Screpanti, E. (Eds.), Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.

Dow, S.C., 2004. Structured pluralism. Journal of Economic Methodology 11, 275-290.

Dow, S.C., 2011. Heterodox economics: history and prospects. Cambridge Journal of Economics 35, 1151-1165.

Faber, M., 2008. How to be an ecological economist? Ecological Economics 66, 1-7.

Faber, M., Manstetten, R., Proops, J., 1996. Ecological Economics: Concepts and Methods Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.

Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., 1994. The worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecological Economics 10, 197-207.

Garnett, R.F., 2006. Paradigms and pluralism in heterodox economics. Review of Political Economy 18, 521-546.

Howarth, R.B., 1995. Sustainability under uncertainty: A aeontological approach. Land Economics 71, 417-427.

Howarth, R.B., 2007. Towards an operational sustainability criterion. Ecological Economics 63, 656-663.

Howarth, R.B., Wilson, M.A., 2006. A theoretical approach to deliberative valuation: aggregation by mutual consent. Land Economics 82, 1-16.

Ikeme, J., 2003. Equity, environmental justice and sustainability: Incomplete approachesin climate change politics. Global Environmental Change 13, 195-206.

Illge, L., Schwarze, R., 2009. A matter of opinion—How ecological and neoclassical environmental economists and think about sustainability and economics. Ecological Economics 68, 594-604.

Klitgaard, K.A., Krall, L., 2012. Ecological economics, degrowth, and institutional change. Ecological Economics 84, 247-253.

Lo, A.Y., Spash, C., in press. Deliberative monetary valuation: In search of a democratic and value plural approach for environmental policy. Journal of Economic Surveys.

Martinez-Alier, J., 1987. Ecological Economics: Energy, Environment, and Society. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Martinez-Alier, J., 2005. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.

Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., O'Neill, J., 1998. Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics 26, 277-286.

Martínez-Alier, J., Pascual, U., Vivien, F.-D., Zaccai, E., 2010. Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecological Economics 69, 1741-1747.

Max-Neef, M.A., 2005. Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics 53, 5-16.

Maxwell, J.A., Randall, A., 1989. Ecological economic modelling in a pluralistic, participatory society. Ecological Economics 1, 233-249.

Müller, A., 2003. A flower in full blossom? Ecological economics at the crossroads between normal and post-normal science. Ecological Economics 45, 19-27.

Munda, G., 1996. Cost-benefit analysis in integrated environmental assessment: Some methodological issues. Ecological Applications 19, 157-168.

Norgaard, R., 2003a. Epistemology: Methodological pluralism in theory and practice, in: Neumayer, E. (Ed.), Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics. International Society for Ecological Economics

Norgaard, R.B., 1989. The case for methodological pluralism. Ecological Economics 1, 37-57.

Norgaard, R.B., 1994. Development betrayed : the end of progress and a co-evolutionary revisioning of the future Routledge, London.

Norgaard, R.B., 2003b. Passion and ecological economics: Towards a richer coevolution of value systems and environmental systems in: Dovers, S., Stern, D.I., Young, M.D. (Eds.), New Dimensions in Ecological Economics: Integrated Approaches to People and Nature Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.

Norgaard, R.B., 2007. Deliberative economics. Ecological Economics 63, 375-382.

Norton, B.G., 1989. Intergenerational equity and environmental decisions: A model using Rawls' veil of ignorance. Ecological Economics 1, 137-159.

O'Neill, J., 2004. Ecological economics and the politics of knowledge: the debate between Hayek and Neurath. Cambridge Journal of Economics 28, 431-447.

O'Neill, J., 2007. Markets, Deliberation and Environment Routledge, London.

Özkaynak, B., Devine, P., Rigby, D., 2001. Is Ecological Economics an Alternative to Neoclassical Environmental Economics?, European Society for Ecological Economics Conference, Cambridge, U.K.

Pearce, D., 1987. Foundations of an ecological economics. Ecological Modelling 38, 9-18.

Pearce, D.W., 1998. Economics and Environment : Essays on Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Peet, J., 1992. Energy and the Ecological Economics of Sustainability Island Press, Washington, D.C.

Pelletier, N., 2010. Environmental sustainability as the first principle of distributive justice: Towards an ecological communitarian normative foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics 69, 1887-1894.

Perrings, C., 1997. Economics of Ecological Resources: Selected Essays Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.

Proops, J., 1989. Ecological economics: Rationale and problem areas. Ecological Economics 1, 59-76.

Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Justice Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Rawls, J., 1993. Political Liberalism Columbia University Press, New York.

Rees, W., 2003. Understanding urban ecosystems: an ecological economics perspective, in: Berkowitz, A.R., Nilon, C.H., Hollweg, K.S. (Eds.), Understanding Urban Ecosystems. Springer, New York.

Røpke, I., 2005. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecological Economics 55, 262-290.

Roth, P.A., 1987. Meaning and method in the social sciences: A case for methodological pluralism Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

Sagoff, M., 2011. The rise and fall of ecological economics. Breakthrough Journal 2,http://breakthroughjournal.org/content/authors/mark-sagoff/the-rise-and-fall-of-ecologica.shtml.

Sahu, N.C., Choudhury, A.K., 2005. Environmental and ecological economics: Towards definition, nature and scope, in: Sahu, N.C., Choudhury, A.K. (Eds.), Dimensions of Environmental and Ecological Economics Universities Press (India) Private Limited, Hyderabad, India.

Sahu, N.C., Nayak, B., 1994. Niche diversification in environmental/ecological economics. Ecological Economics 11, 9-19.

Samuels, W.J., 1997. The case for methodological pluralism, in: Salanti, A., Screpanti, E. (Eds.), Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.

Silva, M.C.e., Teixeira, A.A.C., 2011. A bibliometric account of the evolution of EE in the last two decades: Is ecological economics (becoming) a post-normal science? Ecological Economics 70, 849-862.

Söderbaum, P., 1999. Values, ideology and politics in ecological economics. Ecological Economics 28, 161-170.

Söderbaum, P., 2000. Ecological Economics: A Political Economics Approach to Environment and Development Earthscan, London.

Söderbaum, P., 2008. Understanding Sustainability Economics: Towards Pluralism in Economics Earthscan, London.

Söderbaum, P., Brown, J., 2010. Democratizing economics: Pluralism as a path toward sustainability. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1185.

Söllner, F., 1997. A reexamination of the role of thermodynamics for environmental economics. Ecological Economics 22, 175-201.

Soma, K., Vatn, A., 2010. Is there anything like a citizen? A descriptive analysis of instituting a citizen's role to represent social values at the municipal level. Environmental Policy and Governance 20, 30-43.

Spash, C.L., 2002. Greenhouse Economics: Value and Ethics Routledge, London.

Spash, C.L., 2008. How much is that ecosystem in the window? The one with the bio-diverse trail. Environmental Values 17, 259-284.

Spash, C.L., 2009. Editorial: The new environmental pragmatists, pluralism and sustainability. Environmental Values 18, 253-256.

Spash, C.L., 2011. Social Ecological Economics: Understanding the Past to See the Future. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 70, 340-375.

Spash, C.L., 2012. New foundations for ecological economics. Ecological Economics 77, 36-47.

Tietenberg, T., Lewis, L., 2010. Environmental Economics and Policy Pearson, Boston.

Venkatachalam, L., 2007. Environmental economics and ecological economics: Where they can converge? Ecological Economics 61, 550-558.

Waring, T.M., 2010. New evolutionary foundations: Theoretical requirements for a science of sustainability. Ecological Economics 69, 718-730.

Wilson, M.A., Howarth, R.B., 2002. Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecological Economics 41, 431-443.

Zografos, C., Howarth, R.B., 2008. Deliberative Ecological Economics. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.