Iwasa, Kazumichi and Kikuchi, Toru and Shimomura, Koji (2007): A Dynamic Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin Model with Endogenous Time Preferences: A Note.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_4981.pdf Download (253kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This note formulates a dynamic two-country (developed and developing countries) Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin model of trade with endogenous time preferences a la Uzawa (1968). We examine the relationship between initial factor endowment differences and trade patterns in the steady state. In particular, to highlight the integration of developing countries (e.g., China) into the world trading system, we concentrate on the case of asymmetric size of two countries (in terms of population). It will be shown that (i) given that the representative household in each country supplies an equal amount of labor, only intra-industry trade occurs in the steady state irrespective of differences in the number of representative households and that (ii) the number of households being equal, the country with less labor efficiency becomes the net exporter of the capital-intensive good.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | Kobe University |
Original Title: | A Dynamic Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin Model with Endogenous Time Preferences: A Note |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | trade patterns; dynamic trade model; endogenous time preferences |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation |
Item ID: | 4981 |
Depositing User: | Users 1329 not found. |
Date Deposited: | 20 Sep 2007 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 04:39 |
References: | [1] Atkeson, A. and P. Kehoe (2000) ‘Paths of Development for Early- and Late- Bloomers in a Dynamic Heckscher-Ohlin Model,’ Research Department Staff Report 256, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. [2] Chen, B.-L., K. Nishimura, and K. Shimomura (2005) ‘An Uzawa-Oniki- Uzawa Dynamic Two-Country Model of International Trade,’ manuscript, Kobe University. [3] Chen, Z. (1992) ‘Long-run Equilibria in a Dynamic Heckscher-Ohlin Model,’ Canadian Journal of Economics 23, 923–943. [4] Dixit, A. K., and V. Norman (1980) Theory of International Trade, Cambridge University Press. [5] Dixit, A. K., and J. E. Stiglitz (1977) ‘Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity,’ American Economic Review 67, 297–308. [6] Grossman, G., and E. Helpman (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, The MIT Press: Cambridge MA. [7] Helpman, E. (1981) ‘International Trade in the Presence of Product Differentiation, Economies of Scale and Monopolistic Competition: A Chamberlin- Heckscher-Ohlin Approach,’ Journal of International Economics 11, 305– 340. [8] Helpman, E., and P. R. Krugman (1985) Market Structure and Foreign Trade, The MIT Press: Cambridge MA. [9] Hong, W (1988) ‘Time Preference in Dynamic Trade Models: An Empirical Critique,’ Economic Development and Cultural Change 36, 741–751. [10] Kikuchi, T., and K. Shimomura (2007) ‘A New Dynamic Trade Model with Increasing Returns and Monopolistic Competition,’ Review of Development Economics 11, 232–241. [11] Lawrence, E.C. (1991) ‘Poverty and the Rate of Time Preference: Evidence from Panel Data,’ Journal of Political Economy 99, 54–77. [12] Nishimura, K., and K. Shimomura (2002) ‘Trade and Indeterminacy in a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model,’ Journal of Economic Theory 105, 244–259. [13] Nishimura, K., and K. Shimomura (2006) ‘Indeterminacy in a Dynamic Two-Country Model,’ Economic Theory 29, 307–324. [14] Ogawa, K. (1993) ‘Economic Development and Time Preference Schedule: The Case of Japan and East Asian NICs,’ Journal of Development Economics 42, 175–195. [15] Oniki, H., and H. Uzawa (1965) ‘Patterns of Trade and Investment in a Dynamic Model of International Trade,’ Review of Economic Studies 32, 15–38. [16] Shimomura, K. (1992) ‘A Two-Sector Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of Distribution,’ in G. Feichtinger, ed., Dynamic Economic Models and Optimal Control, North-Holland, 105-123. [17] Shimomura, K. (1993) ‘Durable Consumption Goods and the Pattern of International Trade,’ in H. Herberg and N. V. Long, eds., Trade, Welfare, and Economic Policies: Essays in Honor of Murray C. Kemp, Michigan University Press, 103–112. [18] Shimomura, K. (2004) ‘Indeterminacy in a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of International Trade,’ in M. Boldrin, B.-L. Chen and P. Wang, eds., [10] Kikuchi, T., and K. Shimomura (2007) ‘A New Dynamic Trade Model with Increasing Returns and Monopolistic Competition,’ Review of Development Economics 11, 232–241. [11] Lawrence, E.C. (1991) ‘Poverty and the Rate of Time Preference: Evidence from Panel Data,’ Journal of Political Economy 99, 54–77. [12] Nishimura, K., and K. Shimomura (2002) ‘Trade and Indeterminacy in a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model,’ Journal of Economic Theory 105, 244–259. [13] Nishimura, K., and K. Shimomura (2006) ‘Indeterminacy in a Dynamic Two-Country Model,’ Economic Theory 29, 307–324. [14] Ogawa, K. (1993) ‘Economic Development and Time Preference Schedule: The Case of Japan and East Asian NICs,’ Journal of Development Economics 42, 175–195. [15] Oniki, H., and H. Uzawa (1965) ‘Patterns of Trade and Investment in a Dynamic Model of International Trade,’ Review of Economic Studies 32, 15–38. [16] Shimomura, K. (1992) ‘A Two-Sector Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of Distribution,’ in G. Feichtinger, ed., Dynamic Economic Models and Optimal Control, North-Holland, 105-123. [17] Shimomura, K. (1993) ‘Durable Consumption Goods and the Pattern of International Trade,’ in H. Herberg and N. V. Long, eds., Trade, Welfare, and Economic Policies: Essays in Honor of Murray C. Kemp, Michigan University Press, 103–112. [18] Shimomura, K. (2004) ‘Indeterminacy in a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of International Trade,’ in M. Boldrin, B.-L. Chen and P. Wang, eds., [10] Kikuchi, T., and K. Shimomura (2007) ‘A New Dynamic Trade Model with Increasing Returns and Monopolistic Competition,’ Review of Development Economics 11, 232–241. [11] Lawrence, E.C. (1991) ‘Poverty and the Rate of Time Preference: Evidence from Panel Data,’ Journal of Political Economy 99, 54–77. [12] Nishimura, K., and K. Shimomura (2002) ‘Trade and Indeterminacy in a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model,’ Journal of Economic Theory 105, 244–259. [13] Nishimura, K., and K. Shimomura (2006) ‘Indeterminacy in a Dynamic Two-Country Model,’ Economic Theory 29, 307–324. [14] Ogawa, K. (1993) ‘Economic Development and Time Preference Schedule: The Case of Japan and East Asian NICs,’ Journal of Development Economics 42, 175–195. [15] Oniki, H., and H. Uzawa (1965) ‘Patterns of Trade and Investment in a Dynamic Model of International Trade,’ Review of Economic Studies 32, 15–38. [16] Shimomura, K. (1992) ‘A Two-Sector Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of Distribution,’ in G. Feichtinger, ed., Dynamic Economic Models and Optimal Control, North-Holland, 105-123. [17] Shimomura, K. (1993) ‘Durable Consumption Goods and the Pattern of International Trade,’ in H. Herberg and N. V. Long, eds., Trade, Welfare, and Economic Policies: Essays in Honor of Murray C. Kemp, Michigan University Press, 103–112. [18] Shimomura, K. (2004) ‘Indeterminacy in a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of International Trade,’ in M. Boldrin, B.-L. Chen and P. Wang, eds.,The Development Process of Rapidly Growing Economies: From Theory to Empirics, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar Publishing Inc. Chapter 7, 153– 167. [19] Stiglitz, J. E. (1970) ‘Factor Price Equalization in a Dynamic Economy,’ Journal of Political Economy 78, 456–488. [20] Uzawa, H. (1968) ‘Time Preferences, the Consumption Function, and Optimal Asset Holdings,’ in J. N. Wolfe, ed., Value, Capital and Growth: Papers in Honour of Sir John Hicks, University of Edinburgh Press: Edinburgh, 485–504. [21] Ventura, J. (1997) ‘Growth and Interdependence,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 57–84. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/4981 |