Network Strategy in the Digital Economy

Sammut-Bonnici, Tanya (2010): Network Strategy in the Digital Economy. Published in: Strategy: Analysis and Practice (2010)

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with the ‘new’ world of information technology and knowledge intensity. This is a world marked by big investments in R&D, different cost structures and significantly changed demand conditions. You should read this chapter in conjunction with Chapter 19, which deals with knowledge, information and innovation. In this chapter, we are concerned with how the logic of competitive advantage applies to the new conditions in which we find ourselves. To anticipate the conclusions, we will see that the strategic context has shifted a great deal. This means that fundamental demand and cost conditions have changed, resulting in different strategies being pursued. The new world and the new economy do mean that the old strategic logic is outmoded. Instead, we see a significant change in the strategic context that results in the logic of competitive advantage being applied in different ways. The chapter presents and contrasts the differences between the old world of scale and scope economies and the new world of network externalities. There is an extensive discussion of what network externalities are and how they arise but the reader should read this in the context of addition, not replacement – scale and scope have not been replaced; there is, however, another important practical phenomenon to consider. Networks are supported by many layers of infrastructure and we go into some detail to show how the technological infrastructure can be identified and analysed. There are many implications for competition, which we review. Finally, we summarize the implications for strategy – although it is a new world, the logic of competitive advantage still applies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: innovation strategy, innovation, strategic innovation, innovation diffusion, diffusion of innovation, network effects, network externalities
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

References

Arthur, B (1996) ‘Increasing Returns and the New World of Business’, Harvard Business Review, July/Aug.

Arthur, WB (1989) ‘Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock in by historical events’, Economic Journal, 99, pp. 116–31.

Arthur, WB (1990) ‘Positive feedback in the economy’, Scientific American, 262, pp. 92–9. Baumol, W, Panzar, J and Willig, R (1982) ‘Contestable markets and the theory of industry’, American Economic Review, 72.

Bensen, SM and Farrell, J (1994) ‘Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics Standardization’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Spring.

David, PA and Shurmer, M (1996) ‘Formal standards setting for global telecommunications and information services: towards an institutional regime transformation’, Telecommunications Policy, 20, 10.

David, PA and Steinmueller, WE (1994) ‘Economics of Compatibility Standards and Competition in Telecommunication Networks’, Information Economics and Policy, 6.

Digital Planet (2002) The Global Information Economy, Data by International Data Corporation, World Information Technology and Services Alliance, USA.

DiMaggio, PJ and Powell, WW (1983) ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review, 48, April, pp. 147–60.

Dumont, B (2000) Book Review of Carl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian, Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Journal of Network Industries, 1, 1, pp. 101–7.

Economides, N (1996) ‘The economics of networks’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14, 2, pp. 675–99.

Economides, N and Flyer, F (1997) ‘Compatibility and Market Structure for Network Goods’, Discussion Paper EC–98–02.

Ellis, HS and Fellner, W (1943) ‘External economies and diseconomies’, American Economic Review, 33.

Evans, P and Wurster, TS (2000) Blown to Bits, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Evers, J (2002) ‘Siemens joins Symbian Consortium’, IDG News Service, Amsterdam Bureau, ITworld.com 4/23.

Garud, R, Kumaraswamy, A and Prabhu, A (1995) ‘Networking for Success in Cyberspace’, IEEE Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, pp. 335–40.

Henderson, RM and Clark, KB (1990) ‘Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35.

Huberman, BA (1988) The Ecology of Computation, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.

Katz, M and Shapiro, C (1985) ‘Network externalities, competition and compatibility’, American Economic Review, 75, 3, pp. 424–40.

Kelly, K (1994) Out of Control – The New Biology of Machines, Addison Wesley.

Kelly, K (1998) ‘New Rules for the New Economy: 10 ways the network economy is changing everything’, Fourth Estate.

Knight, FH (1924) ‘Some fallacies in the interpretation of social cost’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 38.

Langlois, RN and Robertson, PL (1992) ‘Networks and Innovation in a Modular System: Lessons from the Microcomputer and Stereo Component Industries’, Research Policy, 21, 4, pp. 297–313.

Leyden, P (1997) ‘Moore’s Law Repealed, Sort of ’, Wired, Issue 5.05, May.

Liebowitz, SJ and Margolis, SE (1990) ‘The Fable of the Keys’, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. XXXIII, April.

Liebowitz, SJ and Margolis, SE (1999) Winners, Losers & Microsoft, The Independent Institute, Oakland.

Mathews, JA (2002) ‘Strategizing vs Economizing: Theorizing dynamic competitive behaviour in disequilibrium’, unpublished paper, November.

McGee, J and Sammut-Bonnici, T (2002) ‘Network Industries in the New Economy: the Effect of Knowledge and the Power of Positive Feedback’, European Business Journal, September, 14, 3, pp. 116–32.

Morris, CR and Ferguson, CH (1993) ‘How Architecture Wins Technology Wars’, Harvard Business Review, 71, 2, pp. 86–96.

Pesola, M (2002) Financial Times, 11th April. Saloner, G, Shepard, A and Podolny, J (2001) Strategic Management, Wiley, New York.

Sammut-Bonnici, T and McGee, J (2002) ‘Network Strategies for the New Economy: Emerging Strategies for New Industry Structures’, European Business Journal, December, 14, 4, pp. 174–85.

Shapiro, C and Varian, H (1999) Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Sharkey, NE and Sharkey, AJC (1993) ‘Adaptive generalisation and the transfer of knowledge’, Artificial Intelligence Review, Special Issue on Connectionism, 7, pp. 313–28.

Shy, O (2001) The Economics of Network Industries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Vercoulen, F and Wegberg, M (1998) ‘Standard Selection Modes in Dynamic, Complex Industries: Creating Hybrids between Market Selection and Negotiated Selection of Standards’, NIBOR Working Paper, nib98006, Maastricht. Weiss, T (2001) Computer World, April 2.

Young, AA (1913) ‘Pigou’s Wealth and Welfare’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 27.